anti-bitch Posted July 24 Posted July 24 9 minutes ago, NausAllien said: 1.4M unique donors is much less than the 14.4M who voted for Biden in the primaries. BE FOR REAL! You can't possibly compare 1.4M people PAYING for donations on a random Monday/Tuesday to 14M people casting FREE votes on designated election days. And it was already established that Kamala's $91 million from grassroots was highest amount ever in one day. 1
Rotunda Posted July 24 Posted July 24 22 minutes ago, NausAllien said: This "title" of BORDER CZAR will definitely haunt Kamala and make it VERY hard for her to address the current border crisis. This is one issue that could cost her the presidency. Please become a Republican strategist. We need you in the field. 1
WildAmerican Posted July 24 Posted July 24 30 minutes ago, NausAllien said: This "title" of BORDER CZAR will definitely haunt Kamala and make it VERY hard for her to address the current border crisis. This is one issue that could cost her the presidency. That's misinformation. She wasn't never the "border czar" https://time.com/7001817/kamala-harris-immigration/ Quote Kamala Harris Was Never Biden's 'Border Czar.' Here's What She Really Did n fact, Harris was never put in charge of the border or immigration policy. Nor was she involved in overseeing law-enforcement efforts or guiding the federal response to the crisis. Her mandate was much narrower: to focus on examining and improving the underlying conditions in the Northern Triangle of Central America—El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras—which has been racked by decades of poverty, war, chronic violence, and political instability. The strategy relied on allocating billions for economic programs and stimulating private-sector investment in the region in hopes that these programs would ultimately lead fewer migrants to make the dangerous journey north. 3
Communion Posted July 24 Posted July 24 56 minutes ago, NausAllien said: Maybe she could get away with inflation and other economic issues, but there's no way Republicans won't tie immigration issues to her since she was purportedly Biden's Border Czar. There's also that famous video in which she denied to admit that she hadn't visited the border and had no immediate plans to do so. There is no such thing as a border czar. There is no border crisis and Biden has a far right record on immigration. She was tasked with a diplomatic assignment of investigating root caused for why Central American migration is occuring to the US and what the US can do to help stop people from wanting to leave their countries. Nothing came of this work by nature of what it is and if anything will hurt Harris with progressives given the clip of her saying "do not come" at a presser about Central American migrants. 2 1 1
NausAllien Posted July 24 Posted July 24 Just now, WildAmerican said: That's misinformation. She wasn't never the "border czar" https://time.com/7001817/kamala-harris-immigration/ She in fact was as reported by multiple media sites like AXIOS: Now they're gaslighting people into believing they never claimed such a thing. But they did, even if it wasn't an "official" appointment.
Vermillion Posted July 24 Posted July 24 1 minute ago, NausAllien said: She in fact was as reported by multiple media sites like AXIOS: Now they're gaslighting people into believing they never claimed such a thing. But they did, even if it wasn't an "official" appointment. What is Axios' source? You're literally missing the point on the discrepancies between the reporting and the reality. 1 1
WildAmerican Posted July 24 Posted July 24 1 minute ago, NausAllien said: She in fact was as reported by multiple media sites like AXIOS: Now they're gaslighting people into believing they never claimed such a thing. But they did, even if it wasn't an "official" appointment. The famous US-El Salvador-Guatemala-Honduras border i know it's all connected don't @ me But it doesn't matter what she was or wasn't it's still an electoral weakness for her that they'll have to contend with
Vermillion Posted July 24 Posted July 24 @Virgos GrooveThe entire response thread on that post I already made (it's fine, that's mostly my fault) is a mess of conflicting stats, especially on those that did serve jail time. 1
NausAllien Posted July 24 Posted July 24 1 minute ago, Vermillion said: What is Axios' source? You're literally missing the point on the discrepancies between the reporting and the reality. The denial of reality is scary. Giving me BlueAnon vibes here. It was reported that Biden appointed her on March 2021 "to lead efforts to stem migration across the U.S.-Mexico border" This is the definition of "czar" So even though it was never an official position, she was indeed appointed to coordinate that area. These are FACTS, okay? 4
Communion Posted July 24 Posted July 24 (edited) @NausAllien You're genuinely out of your depth and one has to wonder the actual motivations one has to distort and lie about reality.in the way you've seemingly tried in by quickly googling the last 4 years of US immigration policy in 5 minutes. You're lying about Biden's record yet in a way that explicitly and illogically frames it as progressive or liberal in a way it never was. Biden defended to keep Title 42 in place. He regularly tried to strong-arm Mexico and even supported other Trump policies like Remain In Mexico despite it and Title 42 being found illegal (shocker - Mexico is an autonomous state who also gets to say who crosses into their borders from America). He offered Republicans what would have been objectively the most conservative immigration policy in 30 years and even ended up signing executive orders that left countless refugees and asylum seekers suffering. Edited July 24 by Communion 2 1 1
Recommended Posts