Phoenixstar Posted September 4 Author Posted September 4 2 minutes ago, Phoenixstar said: 51 (-1) 53 (+2) 1 1
Bojana Posted September 4 Posted September 4 6 minutes ago, Miichael said: I'm still not convinced that even with less screentime she will go for supporting actress. If Michelle Williams can be nominated for leading actress for The Fabelmens I'm sure that Gaga will too for JFAD when she is one of the two main focal points of the movie and her character is even referenced in the movie's title. thats also my reasoning why she wont make sense for the supporting
charot Posted September 4 Posted September 4 As long as her acting is acclaimed we good, critics even wanted more of her and that's already a big win 9
hausofbryan Posted September 4 Posted September 4 they saw we were winning with DWAS and said not on our watch 5
Konril Posted September 4 Posted September 4 The silver lining is there are no terrible accent discourse like on House of Gucci. 3
Aston Martin Posted September 4 Posted September 4 3 minutes ago, PlERRE said: I blame... Reveal hidden contents Todd Phillips A plot twist Spoiler And based on the reviews, better than any of the ones in J:FaD 1
Khris Posted September 4 Posted September 4 1 hour ago, Phoenixstar said: 53 (+2) oh we wanted a twist
cloudbusting Posted September 4 Posted September 4 at least I can stop pretending to gaf about this movie LG7 soon! 5
Kimi Posted September 4 Posted September 4 when this panning makes are abandon film career and do dark pop full time
Abracadabra Posted September 4 Posted September 4 The overdramatics Joaquin WON an Oscar for the first film despite a VERY polarising and mixed critical response and low MC rating. 7 1
Sugden Posted September 4 Posted September 4 Just now, Konril said: The silver lining is there are no terrible accent discourse like on House of Gucci. Thank god they ditched harleys accent
Jack! Posted September 4 Posted September 4 3 minutes ago, Kanes said: LG7 LEAD PULLED FORWARD? Desperate times call for desperate measures. 1
hausofbryan Posted September 4 Posted September 4 how many more panned movies can her career take 5 1
Velvet Posted September 4 Posted September 4 Sequels mostly perform worse at the oscars so with these reviews the film is very much done
Baby Judas Posted September 4 Posted September 4 Are there complains of it being too musical? Tbh, not really fan of musical movies..
hausofbryan Posted September 4 Posted September 4 Just now, Velvet said: Sequels mostly perform worse at the oscars so with these reviews the film is very much done Maybe she can still win an MTV Movie Award 3
Freaky Prince Posted September 4 Posted September 4 1 minute ago, hausofbryan said: how many more panned movies can her career take Maybe ASIB was just a lucky strike
Infernal Paradise Posted September 4 Posted September 4 Screaming at almost EVERY review, panning or acclaiming the movie, highlights Gar's performance or talks about how underutilized she was. Ohh Godga, you will always be the centerpiece of everything you take up. 13
opbranden Posted September 4 Posted September 4 Quote The film's cast sees the return of its great lead, Joaquin Phoenix, who once again transformed himself, becoming skin and bones for the role. A new addition is the surprising Lady Gaga as Harley Quinn, once again demonstrating her immense acting talent, which will very likely be her future alongside music. But what impression did *Joker 2* leave on us after seeing its preview at the Venice Film Festival? Well, perhaps it would have been better to leave things as they were and preserve the memory of the first film, which made such a significant impact. Lady Gaga's character isn't explored deeply enough, and the same goes for the depiction of the relationship between Harley Quinn and Joker, which deserved to be far less superficial and rushed. It's a shame, but *Joker 2* doesn't land, doesn't move, doesn't make an impact—despite the undeniable talent of Joaquin Phoenix and Lady Gaga. She's only getting praises, it's so sad that the movie sucks 4
Recommended Posts