base talk Am I the only one who thinks if DWAS was Gaga's solo song, it would also be a smash?

[MoonGoodandHappy]

I think it's a coincidence that her songs that recently hit number 1 are all duets. I'm sure if Gaga was alone on this song, it would have been just as successful.

 

By the way, I would have loved a version of the song where Bruno Mars is replaced by Joe Calderone, her alter ego, and he would have been in the music video. 

 

I think that Gaga is cursed since 2011. She is so talented and deserves better. 

Edited 5 hours ago by MoonGoodandHappy

[Solaria]

I dunno if it would have been the gigantic smash like it is now, because her and Bruno´s chemistry (both in the song and in the video) definitely helped a TON with it's popularity, but it definitely would not have been a flop either. It would've done much better than Disease.

 

 

[Kayseri Mantisi]

 

[Rico Shameless v2]

I don't think so. Gaga wouldn't have mastered the melody as it is, just based off of her other ballads, and Bruno is kind of the highlight vocally throughout the track. It works as a duet together.

[Sheep]

Gaga's songwriting is what carried it, not a coincidence every ballad she's ever released as a single became a classic. It's so transparent why a certain base is foaming at the mouth to tear Gaga down over this, some girls make songwriting their whole brand and won't ever have a truly classic ballad outside of their cult.

Edited 5 hours ago by Sheep

[Zaram]

Love ballads with a male & female singer are just easier to be mega smashes.

DWAS would be solo also a hit but not the mega smash hit which it is rn

[Loca]

The song only works as a duo so no

Edited 5 hours ago by Loca

[Havoc]

We will see if she can get a solo smash on LG7 then.

[Erreur2 La Nature]

DWAS is a cute song but it 100% sounds like a Bruno Mars song. I think it could have done fine if it was just Gaga but certainly not as big as it currently is. Let's be real, the fact Bruno's on it and that it's a male/female duet is helping a lot. 

[kimberly]

yes, you're the only one.

 

DWAS probably, realistically, wouldn't have worked with either Gaga or Bruno solo. Gaga's role is pretty much interchangeable whereas Bruno is integral to the song and its success, though.

[Dear Reader]

I pray that one day this forum and the stan world in general will drop the word "solo" out of their vocabulary. It doesn't matter if a smash is a solo song or not. a smash is a smash 

[R.E.M.]

To answer this question, you would have to look at Gaga's track record for solo singles in the last few years:

 

Disease: #27

Happy Mistake: N/A

Hold My Hand: #49

 

It's not unreasonable to think that the success of this collaboration is bolstered by the fact that this is Bruno's first non-Silk Sonic 'comeback' single since 2016. This doesn't minimize Gaga's contributions or talent, but to act like the collaboration didn't benefit from being a collab is moronic.

16 minutes ago, Sheep said:

Gaga's songwriting is what carried it, not a coincidence every ballad she's ever released as a single became a classic. It's so transparent why a certain base is foaming at the mouth to tear Gaga down over this, some girls make songwriting their whole brand and won't ever have a truly classic ballad outside of their cult.

Gaga is a legend and absolutely has nothing to prove, but it's this type of hyperbole that gets her base dragged

[DiamondHoe]

I think the song would've been a hit for sure. But not to the same extent 

 

Boy/Girl love duets are often big classics 

 

Islands in the Stream, Don't Go Breaking my Heart, Shallow, etc. 

 

 

[R.E.M.]

1 minute ago, Dear Reader said:

I pray that one day this forum and the stan world in general will drop the word "solo" out of their vocabulary. It doesn't matter if a smash is a solo song or not. a smash is a smash 

The 'solo' qualifier only came to be when the Monsters kept antagonizing the Hive with 'nO sOlo HiTs SiNce BuSh AdmInisTraTioN ' and clowning Beyoncé for jumping on hits to get #1s. In my opinion, a hit is a hit but if a certain fanbase formerly set a precedent that only solo hits matter, then they should stand firm in their stance

[aotearoa]

yes 

[Katamari]

I was so confused at the responses in this thread until I realized the thread was not about DWUW

[Onyxmage]

 Thanks for the laugh. 

[loveisdead9582]

I mean, I think it still would have done well but it wouldn't have worked as well if either artists did it solo. 

[Red Velvet]

It would have been bad.

 

I think she mentioned Bruno wanted to sing a very particular way for the record so she did.

 

If she didn't have that guidance she would have done some grating vocals she likes to do recently.

[Material Girl]

no, it sounds like a bruno song

 

the other ballad gaga released this year (happy mistake) flopped to oblivion 

[Devin]

if dwas was solely gaga it would have not smash like this. prob top 10 debut with 6 week stability. this is one of those songs that needed a collab. 

[OrgVisual]

It doesn't work because Bruno wrote and came up with the song and Gaga only jumped in and finished it.

 

She tried similar things with Happy Mistakes and the result is day and night

[KingWitch]

Lol people only listen to that song because of Bruno, Gaga should consider herself lucky that Bruno agreed to do it

[MoonGoodandHappy]

9 minutes ago, KingWitch said:

Lol people only listen to that song because of Bruno, Gaga should consider herself lucky that Bruno agreed to do it

Girl, bye. Go back to watching Charmed

[Arrows]

The song has Bruno's writing all over it, so it could never exist as a Gaga song.