on the line Posted Thursday at 02:52 PM Posted Thursday at 02:52 PM 44 minutes ago, SlimyGhoul said: i think Taylor has made some AMAZING pop songs but nothing on TTPD stood out to me as like a really good pop song. It was a bit phoned in. Lol, but it's not a pop album? Weird take. 1
Kimbra Posted Thursday at 03:02 PM Posted Thursday at 03:02 PM Midnights = Views TTPD = Scorpion 1 2 2
Dante Silva Posted Thursday at 03:18 PM Posted Thursday at 03:18 PM I think if people are honest, they will admit when they first heard TTPD - they got the vibe it is comprised of archive material they mostly already had, that never made the cut of some of her previous republic era records.
Mariano Posted Thursday at 03:38 PM Posted Thursday at 03:38 PM (edited) 17 hours ago, NEX said: Critics list will forever remain the prestigious barometers of quality unlike peer/fan voted awards like the Grammys or Nickelodeon. Taylor released a good 100+ songs (if we count all the many versions that are available) this year and had the biggest album of the year (by the numbers), but neither the album nor any of its songs managed to make it into the Album of The Year aggregate Top 50 albums or Top 50 songs of the year. What happened? https://www.albumoftheyear.org/list/summary/2024/ https://www.albumoftheyear.org/songs/best/2024/ Edited Thursday at 03:38 PM by Mariano
JoeAg Posted Thursday at 05:13 PM Posted Thursday at 05:13 PM oh sorry @mael! didn't mean to strike a nerve just giving what's called an opinion. not disrespecting Taylor for her mid project, just giving my opinion on the project itself lol 1
PopFan Posted Thursday at 05:17 PM Posted Thursday at 05:17 PM The Albatross kinda deserve Disease's success.
SpaceOddity Posted Thursday at 05:33 PM Posted Thursday at 05:33 PM Apart from the fact it's simply too long, there's mere fact that there's nothing for the casual fan to grab onto: It's not catchy, there's this overly self indulgent atmosphere with references and lore that interest only hardcore Swifties, every song is an uninspired and derivative version of a much better song she's done in the past, there's zero variation sonically and the production is beige and dull as ****. Coming from someone who genuinely loved Folklore/Evermore/Midnights, that was a **** album. 3
SlimyGhoul Posted Thursday at 06:02 PM Posted Thursday at 06:02 PM 3 hours ago, on the line said: Lol, but it's not a pop album? Weird take. what would you consider it 1
Joaco95 Posted Thursday at 07:03 PM Posted Thursday at 07:03 PM 20 hours ago, Saintlor said: Critics aren't credible if Brat is the #1 acclaimed album of the year this but they are right about ttpd tho
gustavothehuman Posted Thursday at 07:20 PM Posted Thursday at 07:20 PM (edited) Not people in the first page saying that charting high on year-end lists is better than a Grammy... The Recording Academy made some questionable decisions over the years, sure, but just ask any musician! Respect from your brothers and sisters in the craft is much more important than Twitter vibes journalists. Edited Thursday at 07:23 PM by gustavothehuman
NEX Posted Thursday at 07:23 PM Author Posted Thursday at 07:23 PM 3 hours ago, Dante Silva said: I think if people are honest, they will admit when they first heard TTPD - they got the vibe it is comprised of archive material they mostly already had, that never made the cut of some of her previous republic era records. I've been thinking about this as well. A lot of the songs on this album are seemingly leftovers from previous eras that didn't make the cut, which she then readjusted to the album's sound. The most obvious one is Thank You Aimee. It was clearly written in Reputation era, probably to some synth beat. But then she decided to put it on the Anthology, and make it into an acoustic song, which doesn't work at all with those lyrics. I've said this many times, but the main goal of this album was to have a lot of tracks: she wanted a Morgan Wallen moment with an album that wouldn't leave the top 5 for years (that failed). And she also wanted to have 31 tracks exactly, because 31 is 13 backwards: that's the kind of stuff Swifties really love their favourite artist to creatively focus on. So she keeps focusing on numerology and charts and keeps releasing bloated albums like this and her fanbase just eats it up without any critical thoughts and finds excuses to blame why no one outside the core base likes it. P.S. There are a lot of great songs on that album, some are even outstanding. She still has her writing skills, but she keeps focusing on wrong stuff (like numerology, charts, money). That's my main problem with her at the moment. This would have been an excellent 10-13 track album if she was a genuine artist, not a chartist. 2 2 1
Truth Teller Posted Thursday at 07:26 PM Posted Thursday at 07:26 PM 4 hours ago, tiagol88 said: Honestly this era feels like what it was for Michael Jackson when he released Dangerous or something like that. Record breaking sales, big album, big budget, big tour, big everything but at the end of the day it's a star at the height of her career releasing an over bloated album. No, that era spawned 3 US smashes and like 7 worldwide hits, with Remember The Time being one of his most remembered. Even HISstory had several legitimate hits on it. The pedo's only album that is precisely as hitless as Department is his last one he did in 2000-ish, but that was an overall bomb. Taylor's album was actually consumed. So, that doesn't work as a comparison either 2
Bubble Tea Posted Thursday at 07:30 PM Posted Thursday at 07:30 PM I'm not really even a Taylor fan but I thought TTPD had some of her best work on it for a while. It was for the lovesick / depressed girlies and if you got it, you got it. 2
Catch22 Posted Thursday at 07:33 PM Posted Thursday at 07:33 PM 6 minutes ago, NEX said: I've been thinking about this as well. A lot of the songs on this album are seemingly leftovers from previous eras that didn't make the cut, which she then readjusted to the album's sound. The most obvious one is Thank You Aimee. It was clearly written in Reputation era, probably to some synth beat. But then she decided to put it on the Anthology, and make it into an acoustic song, which doesn't work at all with those lyrics. I've said this many times, but the main goal of this album was to have a lot of tracks: she wanted a Morgan Wallen moment with an album that wouldn't leave the top 5 for years (that failed). And she also wanted to have 31 tracks exactly, because 31 is 13 backwards: that's the kind of stuff Swifties really love their favourite artist to creatively focus on. So she keeps focusing on numerology and charts and keeps releasing bloated albums like this and her fanbase just eats it up without any critical thoughts and finds excuses to blame why no one outside the core base likes it. P.S. There are a lot of great songs on that album, some are even outstanding. She still has her writing skills, but she keeps focusing on wrong stuff (like numerology, charts, money). That's my main problem with her at the moment. This would have been an excellent 10-13 track album if she was a genuine artist, not a chartist. Nah, she's definitely written this while re-recording reputation TV, it references things that happened years later than 2016-2017.
Kimi Posted Thursday at 07:45 PM Posted Thursday at 07:45 PM 21 minutes ago, NEX said: she also wanted to have 31 tracks exactly, because 31 is 13 backwards: that's the kind of stuff Swifties really love their favourite artist to creatively focus on. now that's a high quality read 7
NEX Posted Thursday at 08:00 PM Author Posted Thursday at 08:00 PM (edited) 18 minutes ago, Kimi said: now that's a high quality read The reason Folklore and Evermore have 16 & 15 tracks each is because 16+15 = 31, and 31 is 13 backwards Edited Thursday at 08:03 PM by NEX
Headlock Posted Thursday at 08:07 PM Posted Thursday at 08:07 PM 5 minutes ago, NEX said: The reason Folklore and Evermore have 16 & 15 tracks each is because 16+15 = 31, and 31 is 13 backwards And you are trying to convince us you aren't obsessed 2
burninredhot Posted Thursday at 08:09 PM Posted Thursday at 08:09 PM 4 minutes ago, NEX said: The reason Folklore and Evermore have 16 & 15 tracks each is because 16+15 = 31, and 31 is 13 backwards Stop making up issues out of nothing just to boost this thread also folklore+evermore have 34 tracks I'm sure your obsessed a** knows that
Rotunda Posted Thursday at 08:09 PM Posted Thursday at 08:09 PM They could have included this one idk idk
NEX Posted Thursday at 09:26 PM Author Posted Thursday at 09:26 PM 1 hour ago, Headlock said: And you are trying to convince us you aren't obsessed Didn't you just go through the entire thread and downvote every.single.one of my replies. Talking about obsessed AND bothered 1 hour ago, burninredhot said: Stop making up issues out of nothing just to boost this thread also folklore+evermore have 34 tracks I'm sure your obsessed a** knows that The thread is pretty active, I don't need to boost it. I was just replying to a member, it's not like I was bumping it 3 months later. And before coming up with this dumb take you could at least click play on the video which I timestamped where Taylor herself says she forced it to happen so 16+15 = 31, which is 13 backwards (peak creativity). She's talking about standard editions of those albums obviously. You thought you clocked me there 2
KillingYourCareer Posted Thursday at 09:34 PM Posted Thursday at 09:34 PM It's a low effort project... even most of her fans admit it 1
Infatuation_Junkie Posted Thursday at 11:44 PM Posted Thursday at 11:44 PM I've seen this episode and still loved the show
ATRL Moderator MissedTheTrain Posted yesterday at 02:55 AM ATRL Moderator Posted yesterday at 02:55 AM 7 hours ago, NEX said: I've been thinking about this as well. A lot of the songs on this album are seemingly leftovers from previous eras that didn't make the cut, which she then readjusted to the album's sound. The most obvious one is Thank You Aimee. It was clearly written in Reputation era, probably to some synth beat. But then she decided to put it on the Anthology, and make it into an acoustic song, which doesn't work at all with those lyrics. This is not true though, these are all new songs (we can see when they were registered). She wrote Thank You Aimee with Aaron Dessner, who she didn't work with until 2020. The way they most often work together is he sends her instrumental tracks and she writes on top of them. 3
NEX Posted yesterday at 03:47 AM Author Posted yesterday at 03:47 AM 51 minutes ago, MissedTheTrain said: This is not true though, these are all new songs (we can see when they were registered). She wrote Thank You Aimee with Aaron Dessner, who she didn't work with until 2020. The way they most often work together is he sends her instrumental tracks and she writes on top of them. Oh ok. Very odd song nonetheless 1
Recommended Posts