Jump to content

UPDATE: Baldoni dropped by agency | Blake Lively sues Justin Baldoni


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 323
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Rep2000

    14

  • MattieB

    14

  • Nova_23

    9

  • JoeAg

    7

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
5 hours ago, Space Cowboy said:

Both parties engaged in smear campaigns against each other. Blake simply lost the pr battle, and now she's suing because her privileged self cannot accept not getting her way for once.

Yep, you accurately clocked the actual situation. That won't go over well with the crowd here who considers anything written in the pages of NYT or a lawsuit complaint to be 100% authenticated gospel.

  • Thanks 3
  • Thumbs Down 8
Posted

Baldoni is OVER

 

Good Riddance 

Posted
45 minutes ago, By the Water said:

People being like "they're both terrible people. He's a predator and she's annoying" :rip:

yep. people also saying "team no one" when you definitely should be team someone if you read the NYT article

  • Like 5
Posted
6 minutes ago, Rep2000 said:

Honey, you are asking ATRLers to read for themselves here (fun fact: they can't). They would rather wait for a 5 mins Tiktok to tell them what to think, judging by most the comments in here.

They're more likely waiting for "viral" hate tweets from Elon Musk's X:gaycat4:

  • Like 2
Posted
36 minutes ago, Nova_23 said:

No? They obtained a copy of the lawsuit and are merely publishing the details of it which contain texts from Baldoni and his team incriminating him of the things Blake states he did including trying to ruin her image 

Lol let's not be intentionally naive. Lively and her team collaborated with a friendly contact at the NYT to get them an advance copy of the lawsuit, have the entire piece written and ready to hit publish the moment they filed with the court. That's how this works, celebrities and the press have always had a symbiotic "scratch my back, I'll scratch yours" relationship. 

  • Like 4
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted

Uhmmm yeah I think some people don't deserve to live

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, Feanor said:

 

f84e17d68b3496d3682ba68035ddb0d9

 

oprah.gif

Spiderboy once again proved he's incapable of not being obsessed with Taylor's personal life :pukey:

 

Also, not really that susprised Scooter is behind a smear campaign specialist PR firm, considering that he did that **** countless times to others, including his own former clients. 

  • Like 13
Posted

The leaked PR doc in the suit was all planning for a response to "Blake attempting to bully her way into buying the rights for It Starts With Us"

 

spacer.png

 

tea?

  • Thumbs Down 5
Posted

Lawsuit, dropped by label and exposed in less than a day is crazy

But him hiring johnny's team really shows how much he knew he needed to do to damage control, so he scares her away

little did he know she took her time and came back with receipts :clap3:

good for her honesty, he's DONE

  • Like 8
Posted

Damn! They got him up out of there. This is going to be a mess.

Posted
Quote

The official promotion plan instructed the cast to focus more on the uplifting aspects of the movie than on abuse, and to embrace a floral theme (her character has a flower shop). In several appearances, she never made reference to domestic violence at all. And she faced criticism when her Betty Booze beverage company was promoting the film, given the role alcohol can play in abusive relationships.

Seeing that blowback, the text messages show, Mr. Baldoni and his P.R. team decided instead to highlight survivors of domestic violence in his interviews and social media.

-So they DID NOT actually plan this angle of attack and it was more of a reactive approach after people were ALREADY attacking her.

 

- if the cast "was instructed" to highlight the positive aspects, then how was Justin able to talk  about DV so freely?

 

That being said, those texts are pretty damning and his behavior is dispicable (if true).

Posted
Quote

This to me sounds like a rich person's gun fight. One side pulled out their gun first and the other one pulled out their gun too late.

Did he aim and fire first? Yes, and succeeded. She's mad that she didn't fire first.

Jfkkakd the accuracy. Throw them both in hell.

  • Thanks 1
  • Thumbs Down 5
Posted
4 minutes ago, StayFrosty said:

 

- if the cast "was instructed" to highlight the positive aspects, then how was Justin able to talk  about DV so freely?

 

he switched once the cast shunned him.

 

image.png

image.png

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 4
Posted (edited)

This part made my skin crawl :biblio:

 

"He doesn't realise how
lucky he is right now[.] [W] e need to press on him just how ******* lucky[.] The whispering in the ear[,]
the sexual connotations like Jesus ******* Christ[.] Other members feeling uncomfortable watching
it[]I mean there is just so much."

 

Edited by Cleanromantic
  • Like 4
Posted

Now he can go into obscurity with Gina Rodriguez :heart:

  • Haha 1
Posted

Why did they have the impression that Blake would make the story public and why would they run a smear campaign against her as if both of these scenarios wouldn't ruin the movie's performance? Sth's not clicking.

  • Thanks 2
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

Hope these kind of quick responses from companies and firms become more common

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, dumbsparce said:

Why did they have the impression that Blake would make the story public and why would they run a smear campaign against her as if both of these scenarios wouldn't ruin the movie's performance? Sth's not clicking.

Probably because of this:
 

Quote

When Lively filmed the birth scene mostly nude with her legs on stirrup and only a small piece of fabric to cover her genitalia, Baldoni allowed Wayfarer Studios' co-chairman and billionaire backer Steve Sarowitz to visit the set without Lively's prior consent, essentially exposing Lively to this person. She was not provided anything to cover herself between takes until after multiple requests. Sarowitz later allegedly said he was prepared to spend up to $100M to destroy the lives of Lively and her family.

Justin managed to get someone bigger than him involved with the abuses, so she would not only have to fight Justin alone, but also his billionaire backer. Oh this piece of **** is insidious!

Edited by Rep2000
  • Thanks 9
Posted

Have Swifties not realized they are Blake's PR tactic yet? 
 

spacer.png

  • Thanks 5
  • Haha 2
  • Thumbs Down 20
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.