Young In Love Posted Thursday at 09:12 PM Posted Thursday at 09:12 PM this decision has been growing on me seeing OGHs lose their mind (as usual) oh Gaga, the hit-maker that you are 1 2
Mariano Posted Thursday at 09:13 PM Posted Thursday at 09:13 PM 56 minutes ago, Mr. Stratus said: Lmao almost the entire thread being Britney stans fuming but with bey and dua avis I can't sksksksks ikr.. it's getting weird
itsnotaegg Posted Thursday at 09:22 PM Posted Thursday at 09:22 PM 9 minutes ago, Digitalism said: We are not clinging into anything. It was the monsters that kept saying that Gaga was never going to put this song on the album because she cared about the arts. Now yall changing the narrative because Gaga didn't have neither charts or arts on that album. I been saying she should do this since forever, imagine not including +1B stream song that will be sang for generations on your main project just because of the ghosts of atrl irl nobody cares and honestly I'm not sure why you do 3 1
M.R. Posted Thursday at 09:26 PM Posted Thursday at 09:26 PM 17 pages over what? It was clear the second it exploded that there's no way they would throw away all those streams. 1
Rigalo Posted Thursday at 09:33 PM Posted Thursday at 09:33 PM Be serious yall lol it's one of the biggest, defining hits of the year. Not attaching it to an album would be straight up stupid 2
gagalips Posted Thursday at 09:37 PM Posted Thursday at 09:37 PM I love her so much for doing this. She always has ballads on albums lol Shes playing the game. And it's about damn time. Seethe a bit OGHs. No one outside of pop forums is going to care 1
Mr. Stratus Posted Thursday at 09:46 PM Posted Thursday at 09:46 PM 31 minutes ago, Mariano said: ikr.. it's getting weird Gaga putting a song she actual WROTE and SANG (weird concept?!) onto her own album. Fume a bit 17 pages hihi 3 2
SharGaga Posted Thursday at 09:46 PM Posted Thursday at 09:46 PM 34 minutes ago, Digitalism said: We are not clinging into anything. It was the monsters that kept saying that Gaga was never going to put this song on the album because she cared about the arts. Now yall changing the narrative because Gaga didn't have neither charts or arts on that album. Trust me we don't care if it's on the album or not. The only reason we said she wouldn't is because she said it was a standalone single. In terms of giving the album a boost I always felt like it should have been on the album. Not putting it on an album would be a waste. 2
Mark Rih Posted Thursday at 09:55 PM Posted Thursday at 09:55 PM Quote It was like this missing piece. Girl.. 2
smartalek22 Posted Thursday at 09:58 PM Posted Thursday at 09:58 PM 2 hours ago, Canonical Ensembl said: When the RedOne songs from 2023 session are scrapped/forwarded to other producers yet again Addison now's your chance
Iceland Posted Thursday at 10:01 PM Posted Thursday at 10:01 PM #thankyouGaGa this is all what we wanted!
Dylangaga Posted Thursday at 10:07 PM Posted Thursday at 10:07 PM LMFAO 17 PAGES FOR WHAT? DWAS is Gaga's song so what's the big deal? Every artist tacks on songs to their album but Gaga does it once and yall lose your mind...
hawx23 Posted Thursday at 10:13 PM Posted Thursday at 10:13 PM 1 hour ago, Digitalism said: We are not clinging into anything. It was the monsters that kept saying that Gaga was never going to put this song on the album because she cared about the arts. Now yall changing the narrative because Gaga didn't have neither charts or arts on that album. Who is "we" lmao how weird 4
MatiRod Posted Thursday at 10:25 PM Posted Thursday at 10:25 PM 46 minutes ago, gagalips said: I love her so much for doing this. She always has ballads on albums lol Shes playing the game. And it's about damn time. Seethe a bit OGHs. No one outside of pop forums is going to care She does, this is the same as Dope being on ARTPOP or Speechless on TFM, but what I don't like is that Bruno opens the song and Gaga takes forever to start singing. It feels like Bruno feat. Gaga. If Gaga started the song it would feel more like Gaga feat. Bruno. I hope the version on the album has the verses flipped where Gaga starts the track. 1
Fizzy Posted Thursday at 10:31 PM Posted Thursday at 10:31 PM 5 minutes ago, MatiRod said: She does, this is the same as Dope being on ARTPOP or Speechless on TFM, but what I don't like is that Bruno opens the song and Gaga takes forever to start singing. It feels like Bruno feat. Gaga. If Gaga started the song it would feel more like Gaga feat. Bruno. I hope the version on the album has the verses flipped where Gaga starts the track. Babe thats not the version with a billion streams so why would she change anything. 2 2
willmcclure9 Posted Thursday at 10:44 PM Posted Thursday at 10:44 PM It sounds nothing like Disease so an incohesive album is coming.... unless its jist added to the end on streaming versions... 1 1
BrokenMachine Posted Thursday at 10:52 PM Posted Thursday at 10:52 PM 3 hours ago, Club classic said: I'd do it to, how does this have 15 pages? Endless debates about if she had to do it or not, and Gaga denying it when DWAS was first released
Great808 Posted Thursday at 10:55 PM Posted Thursday at 10:55 PM 17 pages bfrrrrrrrr if she wins a general field Grammy next year y'all are gonna have to check into facilities platinum album first week on lock mmhmm
Abracadabra Posted Thursday at 10:57 PM Posted Thursday at 10:57 PM I'm still not quite grasping how DWAS's success is automatically "thank you Bruno" when it's also his biggest hit by far in years??? And the "solo" thing doesn't really work either because Bruno hasn't released a solo song in 7 years. Love him tho! 3 1
HonourableVomit Posted Thursday at 10:58 PM Posted Thursday at 10:58 PM 1 hour ago, Digitalism said: We are not clinging into anything. It was the monsters that kept saying that Gaga was never going to put this song on the album because she cared about the arts. Now yall changing the narrative because Gaga didn't have neither charts or arts on that album. mind you we haven't heard more than 2 songs on the album 2 1
Recommended Posts