X~MoviePoP Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago People always seem to hate on jlos vocals and say that she cant sing...yet she sounds amazing here and its live. Vs Tate thats popular but lacks any range and vocal technique. So who really is the better vocalist? Thoughts?
Mr.X Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) Tate is a terrible singer, sorry. That ******* constipated baby voice is embarassing Edited 6 hours ago by Mr.X 1
leyaris11 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 2024 almost over, leave JLo alone, she had a rough year already. We can continue drag her in 2025. Edited 6 hours ago by leyaris11
Robyn. Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Why do y'all hate when an artist has a distinctive tone? Her tone is beautiful, y'all tripping. 1 1 2
byzantium Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago J Lo is not a bad singer. Y'all will say just about anything on this site. 2
MusicIsMyMaster Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago Stupid thread. delete thanks. Both have their own unique qualities. Being a amazing singer doesnt mean you have the ability to be a performer or artists. Charli xcx has admitted that she doesnt even have a great voice and loves using auto tune. so what now... 1
Recommended Posts