Jump to content

Why is Lady Gaga's 7th era having a shakier start than her peers?


Recommended Posts

Posted

Weighing in at #27 on the Hot 100, Gaga's latest solo single is off to a shaky, but in my opinion respectable start. There's just one issue, it seems to be really trailing behind her peers' solo lead singles at the same point in their career (seventh studio album).
 

Why do you think this is? Do you think it will be a stable long term hit and make a resurgence like Million Reasons did eventually, giving the liddos the last laugh, or is this more of a Woman's World situation?
 

Is the market just too crowded and competitive now with album bombs and streaming on the Hot 100 or is this a sign of shakiness? TBH I think the sad truth is that music listeners are biased towards male artists so they tend to crowd the charts which make collabs essential for female artists to reach broader audiences. I feel Gaga's relevance does not correlate with this chart performance as she seems to be literally everywhere rn and a certified household name atp.

 

Britney: Hold It Against Me #1

Beyonce: Single Ladies #1 or Break My Soul #1 (7th era not inc Destiny's Chile)

Rihanna: Diamonds #1

Gaga: Disease #27

 

Or is it that her peers are the below group in which case she's doing quite well?

 

Christina: Your Body #34 (underrated bop)

Katy Perry: Woman's World #63

 

 

:suburban:
 


 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 15
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 17

Posted

Please Kukai, come back and claim back your ATRL throne as the campy and funny Gaga troll, we are in dark times

 

:superman:

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
  • Haha 6
Posted

If you Google fad, you see Gaga

  • Like 2
  • Haha 12
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

Not even a Liddo like that but threads like this are kind of cringe omg please come up with better trollings next time you decide to make an attempt

  • Like 7
  • Haha 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted

Folie a Deux 

Posted

When you lay out the stats like that

 

spacer.png

  • Haha 2
Posted

The way now everytime I see "shaky" used in any sentence (even outside of the stan world), I think of Kukai :toofunny2: His impact is crazy

 

MIc7wn0.thumb.gif.09b51e3f687ed1c1a148db

  • Haha 13
Posted

Do you OGHs ever shut the f*ck up?

 

It's getting sad at this point :deadbanana4:

  • Haha 1
  • Thumbs Down 6
Posted

At least come up with something creative 

like imagine how tired we are atp

  • Like 1
Posted

All those gaga threads today. The coping. And all because she is back at #1 on Spotify and had an amazing performance while some other girl delivered a fergie moment :dies:

  • Like 2
  • Haha 5
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

@Kukaiplease return :chick3:

  • Haha 2
Posted

You will NEVER be Kukai, give it up Deelishis.

 

MIc7wn0.thumb.gif.09b51e3f687ed1c1a148db

 

 

  • Haha 3
Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, HASHTAGPOW said:

If you Google fad, you see Gaga

Wait, I can see Gaga being your Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide, with the way she's such an important, daily presence for your metabolism :toofunny3:

 

FAD.png

 

Edited by Florence Belch
  • Haha 6
Posted

Gaga flopped, it's okay. The song is still a bop.

 

MIc7wn0.thumb.gif.09b51e3f687ed1c1a148db

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I do see the point you're making for sure. Even if you compare their latest Billboard Hot 100 peaks along with Disease's entry, it would look like this:

 

Rihanna: Lift Me Up #2

Britney: Hold Me Closer #6

Beyonce: II Most Wanted #6

Gaga: Disease #27

 

That's not to say that Disease can't rise though!

Edited by Plastic
  • Haha 4
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted

Obviously because she's a flop and a tank who is no longer relevant; the true definition of a washed-up fad.

 

Happy?

Posted
26 minutes ago, єѕℓαм said:

At least come up with something creative 

like imagine how tired we are atp

There's no need to be creative when reporting on factual chart positions in a direct and fair comparison with her peers. It's not my fault her chart performance upsets people.
 

Britney: Hold It Against Me #1

Beyonce: Single Ladies #1 or Break My Soul #1 (7th era not inc Destiny's Chile)

Rihanna: Diamonds #1

Gaga: Disease #27

 

20 minutes ago, Bubble Tea said:

Gaga flopped, it's okay. The song is still a bop.

 

MIc7wn0.thumb.gif.09b51e3f687ed1c1a148db

I agree sis, issa bop. 
 

spacer.png
 

3 minutes ago, lg6chromatica said:

Obviously because she's a flop and a tank who is no longer relevant; the true definition of a washed-up fad.

 

Happy?

I'd be happier if you actually read my OP because if you did you'd know that's not what I think. 
 

Quote

I think the sad truth is that music listeners are biased towards male artists so they tend to crowd the charts which make collabs essential for female artists to reach broader audiences. I feel Gaga's relevance does not correlate with this chart performance as she seems to be literally everywhere rn and a certified household name atp.

 

  • Confused 1
Posted

Going into her 7th era while simultaneously having the biggest global streaming hit of the year, wow :clap3:

 

She also released by far the least commercial and accessible lead single of any of those leads so...

  • Like 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Slap said:

I'd be happier if you actually read my OP because if you did you'd know that's not what I think. 

In my opinion, Disease is an acquired taste, I didn't start really liking/loving it til 4-5 days after release. So I get why it may not be sticking with people. And to be fair, it had a weird rollout with the visuals coming midweek and no physical singles (to date). If it had all that from the get-go I'm sure it would've debuted Top 5-10 on the Hot 100 like Stupid Love. But I'm loving the music and visuals so I can't ask for much more. And it debuted at #7 in the UK (where I'm from) so that's a win for me - bearing in mind no song from Joanne touched the Top 10. Hopefully they know to release the MV/physicals alongside the song for Single #2.

  • Like 1
Posted

Lady Gaga's new single is "underperforming" for reasons that are hard to overlook. Despite being a massive name in pop, it seems like Gaga is recycling her old formulas, banking on the gritty electro-pop sound that worked a decade ago. While it might appeal to die-hard fans, the truth is, the song might feel "outdated" in 2024 to the younger market. In a year where music is dominated by fresh, viral sounds from younger artists like Addison Rae, Gaga's "Disease" lacks the relevance needed to stand out.

 

Gaga's brand of "shock value" and over-the-top theatrics don't seem to have the same pull they once did, and "Disease" hasn't sparked the kind of viral social media moments that drive modern chart-toppers. Even Tate Mcrae, who was barely in the pop scene a couple of years ago, is generating more buzz.

.

Ultimately, it feels like Lady Gaga is maybe relying on nostalgia rather than innovation, in a world where people want something new and exciting, not another rehash of Born This Way aesthetics and sounds.

 

I wish her all the best though, she's for sure talented and deserves mainstream success!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Posted

Maybe because all those other girls you listed were in the 20s at the time of their 7th era while Gaga is 38 years old.

 

MIc7wn0.thumb.gif.09b51e3f687ed1c1a148db

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, lg6chromatica said:

In my opinion, Disease is an acquired taste, I didn't start really liking/loving it til 4-5 days after release. So I get why it may not be sticking with people. And to be fair, it had a weird rollout with the visuals coming midweek and no physical singles (to date). If it had all that from the get-go I'm sure it would've debuted Top 5-10 on the Hot 100 like Stupid Love. But I'm loving the music and visuals so I can't ask for much more. And it debuted at #7 in the UK (where I'm from) so that's a win for me - bearing in mind no song from Joanne touched the Top 10. Hopefully they know to release the MV/physicals alongside the song for Single #2.

I think the darker more industrial sound is something that would appeal to the UK market more than the US so I'm not surprised it's doing better there. I'm also lowkey a fan of a song that doesn't chart well but sticks around and ends up doing well eventually like Iggy's KREAM so who knows it might do that. Even the lead single from brat didn't even chart on the Hot 100 and yet Charli was the moment this year so idk if it's really the best measure of what's big anymore. 

Posted

She is just the Xtina of the 2010's and that's OK, not everyone can have a career like Madonna, Taylor or Beyonce, liddos should be happy that she's going through her Moves Like a Jagger era right now :clap3:

  • Like 3
  • Thumbs Down 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Plastic said:

I do see the point you're making for sure. Even if you compare their latest Billboard Hot 100 peaks along with Disease's entry, it would look like this:

 

Rihanna: Lift Me Up #2

Britney: Hold Me Closer #6

Beyonce: II Most Wanted #6

Gaga: Disease #27

 

That's not to say that Disease can't rise though!

The Britney sneak

  • Confused 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, slobro said:

Maybe because all those other girls you listed were in the 20s at the time of their 7th era while Gaga is 38 years old.

 

MIc7wn0.thumb.gif.09b51e3f687ed1c1a148db

If we did years since debut instead of number of albums, the list would be the same (aside from Britney)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.