Jump to content

Joker: Folie à Deux Review Thread | RT: 32% (-3), MC: 45 (-1)


Recommended Posts

Posted

Not sure why it matters so much to OGH what the movie's score is

 

Her performance is acclaimed and the movie is pretty much guaranteed to be a box-office smash. She already won

  • Haha 2

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • bjorn

    74

  • V$.

    64

  • Assassin

    58

  • Broken

    36

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

This is like calling prism an acclaimed album because it has a green 61 score on metacritic :rip:

  • Haha 2
Posted

My guess is RT score will be in the high 40s/low 50s and MC will be as well 

 

The original started out in the 90s on both but once it was properly screened for critics, they both free fell

Posted
2 hours ago, playboi said:

2 panned films in a row is harsh for gaga, no matter how many "she was ackchually good in it!!!" reviews

 

the gp will start associating her with ass films and she will not generate as much hype thus making it harder for directors to cast her

First of all, the film is not panned and secondly, Gaga was the most praised aspect of the whole thing by even people who gave negative reviews

Posted

This thread will aged like spoiled milk :ryan3:

  • Haha 1
Posted

60 is the new 90 I guess :michael:

Posted

Rise up lotus, rise:alexz:This is the beginning.

Posted
1 hour ago, commander said:

Why do critics hate DC so much :deadbanana4:. I can understand the collective hate for Marvel but at least they don't do McDonald's type content and try to push the envelope a little bit.

:ahh:

 

Last 5 DC movies:

 

- Ezra Miller's The Flush

- Black Adumb

- Aquabomb and the Panned Kingdom

- Trash Bettle

- Shazam! Fury of the Flops

 

The ******* nerve, the audacity :toofunny3:.

  • Haha 5
Posted

the only acting I need from Gaga is VMAs 2009 level performance. enough with the hollywood films gar

  • Haha 1
Posted

WE LOVE HER AGAIN!

 

Yes gAgA yes success!!

Posted
4 hours ago, Tovitov said:

Gaga's issue is that she's only starring in a  movie every 3 or so years.

 

It's normal for the most acclaimed actor/actress to star in duds. But they're also staring in one to two movies a year and can easily move on to the next project. 

But the thing is, Gaga is not purely an actress so she can't afford a yearly movie unlike the others. She's first and foremost a musician.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Spoilerish review:

 

"A triple threat here"

"I think she is going to get into BSA nom for this role."

 

 

Edited by Dula Peep
  • Like 1
Posted

Hold up it had a 200mil budget???

 

RXigIyf.gif

Posted

this setup

RXigIyf.gif

 

Posted

The Gaga PRAISE!

 

0c4C8NY.gif

0c4C8NY.gif

0c4C8NY.gif

 

A LEGEND!!! THE OGH HATE TO SEE IT! GAGA IS THE MOMENT!

 

0c4C8NY.gif

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Gaga acclaim. :WAP:

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

In before Pop Stans tank the Popcorn meter.

 

spacer.png

Posted

If Phoenix/Gaga won Volpi despite the film poor review ATRL will collapse methinks :suburban:

Posted

from 7.2 to 7.4 on IMDb  (+0.2):clap3:
 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Broken said:

:ahh:

 

Last 5 DC movies:

 

- Ezra Miller's The Flush

- Black Adumb

- Aquabomb and the Panned Kingdom

- Trash Bettle

- Shazam! Fury of the Flops

 

The ******* nerve, the audacity :toofunny3:.

They are still far better than anything Marvel has put out in a decade except for Shazam lol

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, FailSafe said:

But the thing is, Gaga is not purely an actress so she can't afford a yearly movie unlike the others. She's first and foremost a musician.

Yeah it's also clear that she's been very carefully picking her roles to somewhat align with her overall persona. ASIB she was playing a pop star, obvious. House of Gucci fits into Gaga the over the top fashion-forward diva with an underlying darkness. Harley Quinn is in the same boat. If she did a Tarantino movie next (one can dream) that would be a great fit. Cleopatra would be too.

 

She basically is going for either music-related or larger than life anti-hero type roles, something fun and glamorous that allows her to put on a show acting-wise and visually. Those roles are scarcer and harder to come by, she's not playing like a housewife or a depressed author or whatever Kate Winslet is doing nowadays.

Edited by MatiRod
  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, playboi said:

2 panned films in a row is harsh for gaga, no matter how many "she was ackchually good in it!!!" reviews

 

the gp will start associating her with ass films and she will not generate as much hype thus making it harder for directors to cast her

HOG - 62%

JFAD - 60% (so far)

 

This is far from being panned you moron :coffee2:

  • Thanks 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, commander said:

They are still far better than anything Marvel has put out in a decade except for Shazam lol

The delusion :rip: 

Posted
43 minutes ago, DockDock said:

from 7.2 to 7.4 on IMDb  (+0.2):clap3:
 

This is the only important metric! It means the film is nowhere average. The overreactions, ugh

Posted

As long as it doesn't end rotten I'm happy. So far its on par with Joker (2019)

Anyone expecting an already divisive movie to suddenly turn out a universally acclaimed sequel was either setting themselves up big time or you're just a hater acting dumb. Godga as usual getting 10s across the board, somehow she always stays here although I think its talent that keeps her here?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.