Jump to content

Joker: Folie à Deux Review Thread | RT: 32% (-3), MC: 45 (-1)


Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, Mr. Peanutbutter said:

I mean didn't the original movie also get mixed reviews? :dies:

yup

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • bjorn

    74

  • V$.

    64

  • Assassin

    58

  • Broken

    36

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
1 hour ago, P.O.P said:

A note to the down vote gang:

 

Your efforts won't make your fave flop less :rip:

-16 (and counting):ryan3:

  • Haha 1
Posted

Is it a musical like it was rumored to or is it a movie movie?? 

Posted (edited)
35 minutes ago, LadyFlopga said:

Will this be the worst rated 1 billion grossing movie?

Would be kinda iconic, ngl

 

ki9bckf.gif

Assuming it stays at 54 (which is unlikely, I think it'll be low 60s by the time of release), it is #9

Joker Folie a Deux: 54

Alice in Wonderland 2010: 53

Pirates Dead Mans Chest: 53

Rise of Skywalker: 53

Jurassic World Fallen Kingdom: 51

The Phantom Menace: 51

Despicable Me 3: 49

Super Mario Bros: 46

Pirates On Stranger Tides: 45

Transformers Dark of the Moon: 42

Jurassic World Dominion: 38

Transformers Age of Extinction: 32

 

 

Edited by Kylizzle
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, Mr. Peanutbutter said:

I mean didn't the original movie also get mixed reviews? :dies:

not right out the gate judging by its earliest metacritic reviews

 

sjhbucB.jpeg

Posted
36 minutes ago, Liafen said:

-16 (and counting):ryan3:

Give it up deelishes, IT'S GAGOVER!

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, gatito said:

not right out the gate judging by its earliest metacritic reviews

 

sjhbucB.jpeg

Oh wow! What a stark contrast to this then 

Posted

if she is such a good actress, why is she wasting it on the 2nd underperforming movie in a row?

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

Starts off at 59% on Rotten Tomatoes, so far. The original has 69%. 

Posted

RT:

 

Dbebebra.jpg

  • Haha 2
Posted

MC: 54

Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, spree said:

if she is such a good actress, why is she wasting it on the 2nd underperforming movie in a row?

Wasting what? This movie will be huge for her and will no doubt push her name recognition and bankability as an actress.

Edited by Jay07
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 5
Posted
21 minutes ago, spree said:

if she is such a good actress, why is she wasting it on the 2nd underperforming movie in a row?

She's not writing the movies though. She's acting in them and getting acclaim, nothing else she can do except be better at choosing her scripts :gaycat5:

Posted
1 hour ago, LadyFlopga said:

Will this be the worst rated 1 billion grossing movie?

Would be kinda iconic, ngl

 

ki9bckf.gif

Haven't some of the transformers movies grossed 1 bil?

Posted

Okay Gaga, time to focus on MUSIC s:wan:

 

This is DOA, Oscars wise mefears :suburban:

 

And now I'm doubting the Box Office

Posted

They should've followed my advice to cast Bradley Cooper as Joker

 

spacer.png

  • Haha 1
Posted

I was skimming through some reviews and it's kinda sending me how once again her director gets lashed and she comes out (mostly) unscathed. Some critiques re: the plot and pace of the film are sooo similar to HOG's. :deadbanana4: Her reviews are fine from what I'm seeing, not actual raves, but good enough to land her more big roles. She really needs to pick better directors in the future. 

 

Fad aside, I was very excited for this film because it sounded great on paper and I already liked the first one although it had its flaws. I also knew this sequel would be divisive and wouldn't score past 60, but the things I'm reading are....not giving. I'll have to wait and see ig. :noparty:

  • Like 4
Posted
1 hour ago, LadyFlopga said:

Will this be the worst rated 1 billion grossing movie?

Would be kinda iconic, ngl

 

ki9bckf.gif

ngl if the incels who loved Joker 1 support this musical I'll be shocked :deadbanana4:

  • Like 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, spree said:

if she is such a good actress, why is she wasting it on the 2nd underperforming movie in a row?

With this reasoning we could also ask ourselves if Katy is such a good artist, why is she wasting it on bombing for the third album in a row? :matty:

  • Haha 2
Posted

Gaga's issue is that she's only starring in a  movie every 3 or so years.

 

It's normal for the most acclaimed actor/actress to star in duds. But they're also staring in one to two movies a year and can easily move on to the next project. 

  • Like 9
Posted
18 minutes ago, FrederickGa said:

Okay Gaga, time to focus on MUSIC s:wan:

 

This is DOA, Oscars wise mefears :suburban:

 

And now I'm doubting the Box Office

If Kate Winslet can win an Oscar for The Reader, Gaga can atleast get a supporting actress nomination for this :gaycat6:

Posted

gaga gets praised even in the bad reviews, an actor can't be blamed for a bad script and bad direction.

 

 

 

 

Todd, you're in danger bb

:khalyan2:

 

Posted

I can already see the incels blaming the Musical & Gaga 

:suburban:

Posted
8 minutes ago, Tovitov said:

Gaga's issue is that she's only starring in a  movie every 3 or so years.

 

It's normal for the most acclaimed actor/actress to star in duds. But they're also staring in one to two movies a year and can easily move on to the next project. 

This is what people don't get. Movies are such a huge group effort, actors can't control the end product, only their own performance. Cate Blanchett, probably the best working actor right now was just in Borderlands, a gigantic bomb. 

 

That said, Gaga needs to pick better scripts and directors.

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
Posted

flopou 

  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.