CécredSpaces Posted May 19 Posted May 19 1 minute ago, YellowRibbon said: 1. The price is kinda irrelevant when the gap is $4. 2. It's still one additional version of the album you can buy, it doesn't matter if people that already bought the album can get it for free, in fact, the most diehard fans will probably buy it either way from another email account. 1. You can buy almost two copies of The Tortured Poets Department for 1 of Billie's. 2. Nobody does that other than Taylor Swift fans and K-pop fans. 5
On The Bound Posted May 19 Posted May 19 Buying a Billie vinyl QUICK, used to stan Taylor but the music is not good enough to put up with her bullying and greed anymore 7
Josh Posted May 19 Posted May 19 1 hour ago, Blackout2006 said: Taylor is in control of her brand. She's a talented businesswoman foremost and wouldn't involve her label in decisions that keep her at the top until it comes to executing them So you're saying Billie is a puppet 2 2
Patient Zero Posted May 19 Posted May 19 2 minutes ago, CécredSpaces said: 2. Nobody does that other than Taylor Swift fans and K-pop fans. This TEA That person is definitely projecting. 1
Redstreak Posted May 19 Posted May 19 41 minutes ago, More Than A Melody said: This is Billie's release week she hasn't been #1 yet, so how is it hypocritical to care if someone who's already been #1 for four weeks does it but not when the person releasing does it? Isn't it the exact reason people were upset on Billie's behalf? That it's Billie's week and they wanted her to be #1? You make no sense. It isn't different standards. It'd be different standards if they'd both released this week and were battling for #1 but that's absolutely not the case. It'd be different standards if people had criticized Taylor for pulling a move like this on her release week, but that's also not the case. It's not hypocritical at all if you think Billie should have her chance of being #1, to not be upset that she's trying to be #1. Like, what is this argument? If you want to come for her by saying that she's hypocritical because "a source close to her said..." then fine? I personally think the most likely scenario is that Billie doesn't care that much (but deep down does, like most artists), but that either way it wasn't her decision. Label-heads get a bonus for reaching a milestone like #1 and they miss out on that when it peaks lower. Sure, you can claim that Taylor's label is pulling the chart games, but we all know she has the label by the nose and they will do whatever she wants them to do and that it's unlikely Billie has that pull with her own label. It's like y'all are incapable of nuance. Once again, you don't get a guaranteed #1 just because it's your release week 4 2
mael Posted May 19 Posted May 19 Yes Billie, you better work for that number 1. (I don't she needed to though)
period sis Posted May 19 Posted May 19 The cringe dogpile from that fanbase in the first few pages only for it to be given away for free for people who already bought it 2 6
Josh Posted May 19 Posted May 19 If this had been Taylor this whole thread would be thousands of comments whining about how she's destroying the ecosystem 2 1
More Than A Melody Posted May 19 Posted May 19 16 minutes ago, Redstreak said: Once again, you don't get a guaranteed #1 just because it's your release week Who where and what said that she should get a guaranteed #1 because it's her release week? I'm saying that WANTING to get a #1 spot and going for it on your release week is understandable and that's what people were complaining about. ATP I'm wondering if you guys even read before quoting. 23 minutes ago, CécredSpaces said: Taylor doesn't even have the normal deal with Republic like it is with other artists. She's only "signed" as far as distribution goes. But the label can't hold her to account in terms of how she wants to release or promote it. It's all her. Her releases aren't even (C) Republic Records. It's (C) Taylor Swift. Billie doesn't have that pull, nor the exact deal. That's what I figured when Taylor put her catalogue back on TikTok before they reached a deal.
Colmillo Posted May 19 Posted May 19 1 hour ago, Blackout2006 said: Well, it's not like it matters since Billie is a far more talented vocalist than Taylor, and that's not contested anywhere besides ATaylorSwifTRL. I'd like to see Taylor sing Birds of a Feather, The Greatest, (particularly the belts) or at least try the vocal runs in Chihiro. Swifties trying to sneak into vocal talk is never not hilarious 1
Taylor fanboy Posted May 19 Posted May 19 37 minutes ago, CécredSpaces said: Her releases aren't even (C) Republic Records. It's (C) Taylor Swift. Tell me you don't understand copyright… 1
CécredSpaces Posted May 19 Posted May 19 Just now, Taylor fanboy said: Tell me you don't understand copyright… I understand it perfectly fine.
Trainwreck Posted May 19 Posted May 19 2 minutes ago, CécredSpaces said: I understand it perfectly fine. It doesn't seem like you do, like, at all. Plus that edited pic you posted above completely destroys any "valid" point you wanna make 1
Tylerbv Posted May 19 Posted May 19 Screaming at the swifties trying to drag Billie's vocals.. I'm convinced each copy of PTSD came with anthrax in the vinyl cover or something. Let me buy another copy of HMHAS 1 3
OrgVisual Posted May 19 Posted May 19 46 minutes ago, Josh said: So you're saying Billie is a puppet Billie is nowhere near being a businesswoman + she's only 22. I doubt she has the call for any business decisions of her career. She made the music and she's the artist 1 1
OrgVisual Posted May 19 Posted May 19 (edited) 49 minutes ago, Redstreak said: Once again, you don't get a guaranteed #1 just because it's your release week Fighting for a #1 on your likely only chance to do so vs Desperation to stay at #1 for the 873637363th weeks And it's only a battle because Taylor ignited it first Now apply your comprehension skill here Edited May 19 by OrgVisual 9 1
Starchild Posted May 19 Posted May 19 1 hour ago, Blackout2006 said: Well, it's not like it matters since Billie is a far more talented vocalist than Taylor, and that's not contested anywhere besides ATaylorSwifTRL. I'd like to see Taylor sing Birds of a Feather, The Greatest, (particularly the belts) or at least try the vocal runs in Chihiro. Swifties trying to sneak into vocal talk is never not hilarious 1 hour ago, Blackout2006 said: No, that's not what she said. She said she hated releasing singles prior to the release of an album. If not directly, then it's clearly implied and inferred by anyone whose comprehension abilities are decent and not attuned to manipulating context 1 hour ago, Blackout2006 said: Plus, how sure are we that this isn't a move from Billie's label lol. 1 hour ago, Blackout2006 said: she's just playing the game, cope 1 hour ago, Le Grande said: She is the most vile artist on earth with or without that, but it's always nice to find reasons to say it. Some of you are so pathetically obsessed with this woman to the point of unhealthy, the parasocial behavior is so weird, more weird than being an actual fan. Good thing the crazy is contained to this craphole. Also lmao at a huge artist backed by a huge label being "AltErNatiVe" some of y'all sound so stupid 1 1
chiliam Posted May 19 Posted May 19 I mean as she should. Everyone should be compete for that top spot. The problem is the pick me attitude, oh im better than than anyone, oh i dont care. And then make opposite actions. For what? Its so hilarious. 5
Headlock Posted May 19 Posted May 19 3 hours ago, hackensucks said: Swifties calling someone desperate is so funny to see The way y'all call Swifties humorless and yet the obvious sarcasm is just *whoosing* over y'all's heads 3
Headlock Posted May 19 Posted May 19 2 hours ago, Blackout2006 said: Taylor is in control of her brand. She's a talented businesswoman foremost and wouldn't involve her label in decisions that keep her at the top until it comes to executing them So Billie is a label puppet then? Obvious /s, but this perfectly illustrates the shifting goalposts between the two 6
Recommended Posts