Jump to content

HIT ME HARD AND SOFT (Review Thread) | Metacritic - 89


burninredhot

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I can't at Pitchfork and Sputnik being portrayed as more serious than The New York Times and Variety and the criteria being threads on ATRL, the most unserious forum of all

 

:suburban:

Edited by Jay07
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 173
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • burninredhot

    26

  • Bends

    14

  • Squall

    9

  • badgirlriri

    9

Honestly screw pitchfork, this album deserves nothing short of a pitchfork 8.7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, VeniceBeach said:

The Independent - 10
The Telegraph - 10
Variety - 9.3
The New York Times - 9
The Line of Best Fit - 9
Slant Magazine - 9
musicOMH - 9
Paste - 8.4
Rolling Stone - 8
NME - 8

The "serious publications" you're talking about that gave the album a 7 or less
Sputnik - 7
Pitchfork - 6.8

That's it
:ryan3:

I do frequent pitchfork.com primarily for musical exposure but their reviews are kinda arbitrary and often influenced by the artists personality outside of the music 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lemon said:

You really think that something getting separate threads on ATRL qualifies said something as serious? :rip:
 

Not to mention that The Needle Drop doesn't have any kind of actual music journalism credentials nor merit like that. :rip:
 

You want to portray them as important simply because they tend to cause drama and be negative for the sake of negativity. 

Why is so hard for some of you to understand that for some people this album was derivative. They don't want to cause drama and be negative. People can have different opinions from yours. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, Digitalism said:

Well pitchfork and the needle drop are the only ones that get separate thread on ATRL. There's a reason for that

A 7 for a female album from Fantano is great actually. He rarely gives 7s or 8s to pop girls. He is not a media publication so he doesn't give out 10s just for the sake of clicks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will this go back to 90 at all

 

:suburban:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Digitalism said:

Why is so hard for some of you to understand that for some people this album was derivative. They don't want to cause drama and be negative. People can have different opinions from yours. 

I am not talking about the album per se. 

Why is it so hard for you to understand that some people like it though? 
 

And the real question is why you deem some opinions as "unserious" just because they had praised certain material? 
How come only those who didn't particularly praise are considered serious? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

deserved 90+ but we don't need critics to tell us this album is great

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It increased to 89 after the last review was added.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Green said:

It increased to 89 after the last review was added.

Come on AllMusic :jonny6:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This deserves 90s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best score they've given her I guess :skull:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Billie isn't serving enough BPM for them I guess

 

:suburban:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nooo, it has peaked at 89 even with Allmusic updates. So the final score is 89 with 22 reviews. :clap3:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/25/2024 at 12:41 AM, Bends said:

Nooo, it has peaked at 89 even with Allmusic updates. So the final score is 89 with 22 reviews. :clap3:

:michael:  so no hope of getting this higher than GUTS ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, RoseBud said:

:michael:  so no hope of getting this higher than GUTS ?

Sadly, no. She may get another review during the week, but 89 is the final point for her.

 

Mainly, because Rolling Stone gave her 4 out 5 (GUTS was 5 out 5) and Pitchfork has rated it as 6.8 (GUTS was 8.0).

These two reviews have downgraded her overall score by 2 points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.