Jump to content

Sen. Lindsey Graham suggests nuking Gaza


GraceRandolph

Recommended Posts

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GENOCIDAL MOSNTER. BLOOD IS ON YOUR HANDS.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just die!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe people are this stupid and evil, yet here we are.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ATRL Moderator

It is so glaringly obvious that it shouldn't need to be said... but we should never entertain the idea of using a nuclear weapon in any capacity. 

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we changed "Gaza" to the "Republican National Convention", I would entertain the thought.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The U.S. is ruled by the most depraved scumbags on Earth

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Why was it okay for America to drop two nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?"

 

It ******* wasn't okay though??? :deadbanana:
 

God, US politicians make my skin crawl. I hate it here.

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disgusting pig :biblio:

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to History, Hiroshima and Nagasaki are seen as a huge mistake just saying..... 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm so european i can barely comprehend what's going on and how it's legal to say that on tv 

 

god if you exist please unmake usa :heart2:

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

monster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And Trump would help do it. Once again proving there is a difference between The two nominees 🤷

 

 

Lindsey is scum

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, GraceRandolph said:

 

This is so shamelessly propagandistic.
 

The press secretary was asked about Tlaib in a briefing the day after her censure. The White House didn't comment on anything regarding her censure except to say that they didn't agree with the phrase. 
 

Lindsey Graham made those comments like… *checks watch*… this morning. Why would the President be chomping at the bits to respond to a Lindsey Graham interview, unprompted? :rip:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, GhostBox said:

And Trump would help do it. Once again proving there is a difference between The two nominees 🤷

 

 

Lindsey is scum

It could be argued that a nuclear bomb is a more humane option than a prolonged military offensive designed to eradicate Palestinians slowly. The end result is identical, and Biden seems to be okay with it. Given the current standards, Democrats will now praise Biden for not openly endorsing Israel dropping a nuke on Gaza. The bar is hell as always for Biden supporters...

  • Like 2
  • Thumbs Down 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ATRL Moderator
1 hour ago, GhostBox said:

And Trump would help do it. Once again proving there is a difference between The two nominees 🤷

 

 

Lindsey is scum

This narrative was already said about Trump in 2016 (if Trump wins he will use the nukes!!). This isn’t a convincing argument because it’s played out. 

  • Like 6
  • Thumbs Down 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kassi said:

This is so shamelessly propagandistic.
 

The press secretary was asked about Tlaib in a briefing the day after her censure. The White House didn't comment on anything regarding her censure except to say that they didn't agree with the phrase. 
 

Lindsey Graham made those comments like… *checks watch*… this morning. Why would the President be chomping at the bits to respond to a Lindsey Graham interview, unprompted? :rip:

Republican Congressmen and Senators have been making these comments for months ("turn Gaza into a parking lot"), and Biden's PR people have had nothing to say about them while they were extremely eager to condemn anyone calling for restraint in Israel's collective punishment campaign as "wrong, repugnant, and disgraceful."

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kassi said:

This is so shamelessly propagandistic.
 

The press secretary was asked about Tlaib in a briefing the day after her censure. The White House didn't comment on anything regarding her censure except to say that they didn't agree with the phrase. 
 

Lindsey Graham made those comments like… *checks watch*… this morning. Why would the President be chomping at the bits to respond to a Lindsey Graham interview, unprompted? :rip:

Oh please. Given his track record and how tightly Netanyahu has Biden on a leash, we all know Biden won't say or do a damn thing. Hell, at this point, I'm not sure Biden can take a **** without Netanyahu's permission.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will 100% happen when Trump wins "but anything to own GeNoCIde JoEE!!" :isudumblmao:

  • Thumbs Down 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He better nuke his brain first :khalyan2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Onyxmage said:

It will 100% happen when Trump wins "but anything to own GeNoCIde JoEE!!" :isudumblmao:

At this point there won't be anyone to nuke next year. Only sand and rotting bones. :coffee:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bloo said:

This narrative was already said about Trump in 2016 (if Trump wins he will use the nukes!!). This isn't a convincing argument because it's played out. 

That would be the case if there were not multiple forces around Trump preventing him from using nukes.

John Kelly had to bring multiple other people in to get Trump not dropping a nuke on North Korea and blaming it on another nation.

And there's no John Kelly around this time.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bloo said:

This narrative was already said about Trump in 2016 (if Trump wins he will use the nukes!!). This isn't a convincing argument because it's played out. 

It has not played out. In 2016 he had guardrails and thankfully there were some people in his administration that didnt agree with his actions which prevented him from doing a LOT more stupid things . He's explicity stated that if he wins again he will install loyalists who will do anything he wants. This is literally a completely dfifferent and more dangerous situation its like Trump 2.0 and I dont think for a second that he will hesitate to use nukes or something else in that region. :dancehall:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.