WitnessOblivia Posted May 12 Posted May 12 I can't believe people are this stupid and evil, yet here we are. 2 2
ATRL Moderator Bloo Posted May 12 ATRL Moderator Posted May 12 It is so glaringly obvious that it shouldn't need to be said... but we should never entertain the idea of using a nuclear weapon in any capacity. 8 3
byzantium Posted May 12 Posted May 12 If we changed "Gaza" to the "Republican National Convention", I would entertain the thought. 1
Cruel Summer Posted May 12 Posted May 12 "Why was it okay for America to drop two nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?" It ******* wasn't okay though??? God, US politicians make my skin crawl. I hate it here. 7 2
Princess Aurora Posted May 12 Posted May 12 According to History, Hiroshima and Nagasaki are seen as a huge mistake just saying..... 7
helpthomas Posted May 12 Posted May 12 i'm so european i can barely comprehend what's going on and how it's legal to say that on tv god if you exist please unmake usa 1
GhostBox Posted May 12 Posted May 12 And Trump would help do it. Once again proving there is a difference between The two nominees 🤷 Lindsey is scum 1 1
Kassi Posted May 12 Posted May 12 1 hour ago, GraceRandolph said: This is so shamelessly propagandistic. The press secretary was asked about Tlaib in a briefing the day after her censure. The White House didn't comment on anything regarding her censure except to say that they didn't agree with the phrase. Lindsey Graham made those comments like… *checks watch*… this morning. Why would the President be chomping at the bits to respond to a Lindsey Graham interview, unprompted? 2
Taylena Posted May 12 Posted May 12 18 minutes ago, GhostBox said: And Trump would help do it. Once again proving there is a difference between The two nominees 🤷 Lindsey is scum It could be argued that a nuclear bomb is a more humane option than a prolonged military offensive designed to eradicate Palestinians slowly. The end result is identical, and Biden seems to be okay with it. Given the current standards, Democrats will now praise Biden for not openly endorsing Israel dropping a nuke on Gaza. The bar is hell as always for Biden supporters... 2 2
ATRL Moderator Bloo Posted May 12 ATRL Moderator Posted May 12 1 hour ago, GhostBox said: And Trump would help do it. Once again proving there is a difference between The two nominees 🤷 Lindsey is scum This narrative was already said about Trump in 2016 (if Trump wins he will use the nukes!!). This isn’t a convincing argument because it’s played out. 6 3
ClashAndBurn Posted May 12 Posted May 12 1 hour ago, Kassi said: This is so shamelessly propagandistic. The press secretary was asked about Tlaib in a briefing the day after her censure. The White House didn't comment on anything regarding her censure except to say that they didn't agree with the phrase. Lindsey Graham made those comments like… *checks watch*… this morning. Why would the President be chomping at the bits to respond to a Lindsey Graham interview, unprompted? Republican Congressmen and Senators have been making these comments for months ("turn Gaza into a parking lot"), and Biden's PR people have had nothing to say about them while they were extremely eager to condemn anyone calling for restraint in Israel's collective punishment campaign as "wrong, repugnant, and disgraceful." 1 1
BionicWooHoo Posted May 12 Posted May 12 1 hour ago, Kassi said: This is so shamelessly propagandistic. The press secretary was asked about Tlaib in a briefing the day after her censure. The White House didn't comment on anything regarding her censure except to say that they didn't agree with the phrase. Lindsey Graham made those comments like… *checks watch*… this morning. Why would the President be chomping at the bits to respond to a Lindsey Graham interview, unprompted? Oh please. Given his track record and how tightly Netanyahu has Biden on a leash, we all know Biden won't say or do a damn thing. Hell, at this point, I'm not sure Biden can take a **** without Netanyahu's permission. 2
Onyxmage Posted May 13 Posted May 13 It will 100% happen when Trump wins "but anything to own GeNoCIde JoEE!!" 1
Taylena Posted May 13 Posted May 13 3 minutes ago, Onyxmage said: It will 100% happen when Trump wins "but anything to own GeNoCIde JoEE!!" At this point there won't be anyone to nuke next year. Only sand and rotting bones.
Rep2000 Posted May 13 Posted May 13 1 hour ago, Bloo said: This narrative was already said about Trump in 2016 (if Trump wins he will use the nukes!!). This isn't a convincing argument because it's played out. That would be the case if there were not multiple forces around Trump preventing him from using nukes. John Kelly had to bring multiple other people in to get Trump not dropping a nuke on North Korea and blaming it on another nation. And there's no John Kelly around this time. 1
Onyxmage Posted May 13 Posted May 13 1 hour ago, Bloo said: This narrative was already said about Trump in 2016 (if Trump wins he will use the nukes!!). This isn't a convincing argument because it's played out. It has not played out. In 2016 he had guardrails and thankfully there were some people in his administration that didnt agree with his actions which prevented him from doing a LOT more stupid things . He's explicity stated that if he wins again he will install loyalists who will do anything he wants. This is literally a completely dfifferent and more dangerous situation its like Trump 2.0 and I dont think for a second that he will hesitate to use nukes or something else in that region.
Recommended Posts