Popular Post Illuminati Posted April 22 Popular Post Posted April 22 (edited) 29 minutes ago, americanshameless said: Can you post some examples? Edited April 22 by Illuminati 16 1
Popular Post LoveInStereo Posted April 22 Popular Post Posted April 22 (edited) I seriously can't imagine devoting so much of my time & energy to thinking about somebody I don't like. I'm not trying to be cruel, some of you actually need hobbies, friends or mental health counselling. She shared some reviews she liked, lots of singers I follow have done that. It's not that deep! Edited April 22 by LoveInStereo 7 7 1
americanshameless Posted April 22 Author Posted April 22 Just now, Illuminati said: Oh, she's a little into it isn't she? 2 2
JohnWayneHolland Posted April 22 Posted April 22 22 minutes ago, Nashe said: What's the difference between proudly posting chart achievements and credible journalists/music critics praising your work? "Credible" and one of them is literally a Swiftie that's writing a book about Taylor definitely unbiased OT: she saw that this is album is getting worse reviews than MIDnights and had to come up with something real quick
KatyPrismSpirit Posted April 22 Posted April 22 (edited) she only retweets the 100/100s Edited April 22 by KatyPrismSpirit 4 1
PoisonedIvy Posted April 22 Posted April 22 2 minutes ago, americanshameless said: Oh, she's a little into it isn't she? It's literally her job, she's SUPPOSED to care about her performance. Yall must be unemployed 1 1
black-star1 Posted April 22 Posted April 22 25 minutes ago, Solaria said: Honestly I could make a whole thread about how petty Taylor has been in the entirety of her life and career I would read
PoisonedIvy Posted April 22 Posted April 22 2 minutes ago, JohnWayneHolland said: "Credible" and one of them is literally a Swiftie that's writing a book about Taylor definitely unbiased OT: she saw that this is album is getting worse reviews than MIDnights and had to come up with something real quick This album is on par with / above Midnights on Metacritic yall say anything I swear
mercurialworld Posted April 22 Posted April 22 6 minutes ago, PoisonedIvy said: When you get positive feedback at work, it's typically public right? In a work meeting, exceptional performances are often met with community praise. Whereas negative feedback is often addressed individually, so as to not shame the person or discourage them from continuing to hone their craft. This is basic human sociology. touché, although i'd love to see her acknowledge and share the constructive criticism as well. that way it shows she's open to growing and improving as an artist. just my two cents!
PoisonedIvy Posted April 22 Posted April 22 Just now, mercurialworld said: touché, although i'd love to see her acknowledge and share the constructive criticism as well. that way it shows she's open to growing and improving as an artist. just my two cents! As a fan, we know she sees the negative criticism. She hired a vocal coach after the negative critiques on her vocals at her Grammys performance in 2008 (or 2009, whichever it was.) She wrote an entire album (Speak Now) by herself after critics were claiming she wasn't actually writing her own songs for her Debut and Fearless. She made a shorter and more cohesive album (1989) when critics called Red bloated and unfocused. She created folklore when ME! & Lover were ridiculed as her songwriting decline. She sees the negative criticisms and she applies them so that she can grow her artistry, she doesn't have to publicly acknowledge that for it to be true 3 5
JohnWayneHolland Posted April 22 Posted April 22 3 minutes ago, PoisonedIvy said: This album is on par with / above Midnights on Metacritic yall say anything I swear Her new album is below Midnights on Metacritic tho, also correct me if I'm wrong but the Pitchfork score hasn't been added yet, so it will go down even more
Click Clack Posted April 22 Posted April 22 38 minutes ago, satellites.™ said: Ms. Thing is so calculated and yet people try to overlook her obvious antics. She knows by doing this the reviewers will be incentivized to be positive for clicks. Other girls would be scalped for this, imagine Beyonce did this, thread would be 100 pages. .
Nashe Posted April 22 Posted April 22 8 minutes ago, JohnWayneHolland said: "Credible" and one of them is literally a Swiftie that's writing a book about Taylor definitely unbiased So critics can't be fans of certain artists? you're silly af
Assassin Posted April 22 Posted April 22 (edited) This is something new singers do when they get reviews of their debut albums. Seems childish Edited April 22 by Assassin 3 1
PoisonedIvy Posted April 22 Posted April 22 2 minutes ago, JohnWayneHolland said: Her new album is below Midnights on Metacritic tho, also correct me if I'm wrong but the Pitchfork score hasn't been added yet, so it will go down even more An 84 and an 85 are basically the same score to me, and even if it goes does with the p4k score there will be other reviews that bring it up. It's going to finish in the mid 80s most likely and to me that's not any sign of negative reception
K$Ellie Posted April 22 Posted April 22 the over analyzing of her every move to fit some narrative is so exhausting 8
Pinkbutterflies Posted April 22 Posted April 22 (edited) 51 minutes ago, satellites.™ said: Ms. Thing is so calculated and yet people try to overlook her obvious antics. She knows by doing this the reviewers will be incentivized to be positive for clicks. Other girls would be scalped for this, imagine Beyonce did this, thread would be 100 pages. Oh plss. Beyonce does the same thing. The only difference is Taylor actually controls her career and strategically plans it while Beyonce's team does it for her and behind her. Edited April 22 by Pinkbutterflies 11
brazil Posted April 22 Posted April 22 (edited) She should share the Paste review too This is so petty and it's testiment to how she tries to bully people into praising her Edited April 22 by brazil
JohnWayneHolland Posted April 22 Posted April 22 3 minutes ago, Nashe said: So critics can't be fans of certain artists? you're silly af I'm not saying they can't be fans, but a Stan will give a biased critique because they love the artist, and also because they want their fave to be critically acclaimed so even if they don't like the album that much they're gonna give it 100 just to get a pat on the back from the artist.
Trent W Posted April 22 Posted April 22 Does she realize how big she is? Honestly she's very insecure for the level of career that she has She doesn't have to care about reviews She doesn't have to go a extra mile to sell more first week She doesn't have to talk about Kim in her tracks Tbh honest she doesn't realize she's pass all that 2 1
Just a Gay on ATRL Posted April 22 Posted April 22 Considering she knows how her fans dox and bully writers who write less than glowing reviews of her (let's not be naive, she's fully aware of it), this is very shady to me. She literally only shared the perfect scores Smaller artists doing this would've been different, but there is a known issue with her fanbase going after writers who don't cast her art in a perfect light that adds a weird subtext to her doing this rn. 1
Recommended Posts