Peroxide Posted April 22 Posted April 22 Yeah I really think in 5 years time this album is going to be held in a very different light… let them cast stones. The fans are happy… that's the main thing. 3 1 3
NEX Posted April 22 Posted April 22 This is so unserious. Can someone enlighten me about Sputnik and how/why they are allowed to have multiple reviews count towards metacritic? Watch Taylor Nation intervene and have them forever banned from counting towards any scores tho
Popular Post AxelFox Posted April 22 Popular Post Posted April 22 Just now, Kimi said: some stans seem to not understand that poptimism is a good thing since pop music used to be unfairly criticized We've definitely gone to the other extreme. Back in 2013 when Beyonce got an 85 for ST that score was literally unheard of in the pop scene, and that was such a monumental release. Nowadays people get 80 scores simply for existing. Music journalism is in need of a shake up. 17
Strawberry Bubble Posted April 22 Posted April 22 2 minutes ago, Cheers said: I miss the days when 70's were considered high for an album. Critics have gotten WAY too safe with certain artists. they gave her a 0.5 5
Burn Posted April 22 Posted April 22 Funny how swiftys have no problem with one extreme (perfect 100 scores) but they do with the low scores. 2 3 1
Popular Post Jay07 Posted April 22 Popular Post Posted April 22 Just now, Raspberries said: You are a BRITNEY SPEARS fan in a thread about critical acclaim I support whatever off topic meltdown you need to have to cope with this downward spiral. 2 17
DLW Posted April 22 Posted April 22 1 minute ago, Peroxide said: Yeah I really think in 5 years time this album is going to be held in a very different light… let them cast stones. The fans are happy… that's the main thing. Blink twice if you're in danger 2
FolkLover1989 Posted April 22 Posted April 22 So first time for a double album , they got new page And now sputnik just gave 4 reviews So much effort is being done so that it goes below 70. Love this 1
Venice B Posted April 22 Posted April 22 inb4 she's also paying for the bad reviews just so her reputation moment later this year makes more sense COME THROUGH MASTERMIND! 2
Strawberry Bubble Posted April 22 Posted April 22 Just now, Burn said: Funny how swiftys have no problem with one extreme (perfect 100 scores) but they do with the low scores. So, do you want her fans to celebrate her down scores?
chosensparkles Posted April 22 Posted April 22 poor Taylor, she can cry in her millions while chronically online haters keep hating 1 1
Kristie Kuwa Posted April 22 Posted April 22 3 minutes ago, Peroxide said: Yeah I really think in 5 years time this album is going to be held in a very different light… let them cast stones. The fans are happy… that's the main thing. Like u grow up and realize it all sounds the same, which it literally does? 1 1
Draper. Posted April 22 Posted April 22 3 minutes ago, Peroxide said: Yeah I really think in 5 years time this album is going to be held in a very different light… let them cast stones. The fans are happy… that's the main thing. Yeah, in 5 years time fans will have 9 new albums and won't have to pretend to like this one. 6 1
NEX Posted April 22 Posted April 22 Watch this album be a turning point in music journalism and the end of poptimism. I welcome it tbh, because everyone and their grandma were getting universal acclaim in the past half a decade that it was impossible to tell which albums were worth checking out and which weren't 2 3
duybeeGAshantiGA Posted April 22 Posted April 22 1 minute ago, AxelFox said: We've definitely gone to the other extreme. Back in 2013 when Beyonce got an 85 for ST that score was literally unheard of in the pop scene, and that was such a monumental release. Nowadays people get 80 scores simply for existing. Music journalism is in need of a shake up. I remember this very well. Things have changed so drastically. Like it's always the extreme it's never actually fair.
Draper. Posted April 22 Posted April 22 Just now, Shelter said: 0.5 is nasty though, not even a 1. Kinda mean It's actually a 1 since it's 0,5 out of 5. 1
Kristie Kuwa Posted April 22 Posted April 22 1 minute ago, Venice B said: inb4 she's also paying for the bad reviews just so her reputation moment later this year makes more sense COME THROUGH MASTERMIND! Dont the TV albums all sound worse than the OGs? Nnnnnn
Peroxide Posted April 22 Posted April 22 (edited) 14 minutes ago, DLW said: Blink twice if you're in danger It's an 8/10 for me. The first volume is spectacular and the second one doesn't quite stick the landing. If this album came out in 2022 (instead of Midnights) we'd be seeing a different kind of critical reaction. Anyways, 78 is a good enough score… I'll reserve getting my knives out unless it somehow falls into the 60's. Edited April 22 by Peroxide
Raspberries Posted April 22 Posted April 22 5 minutes ago, Cheers said: I miss the days when 70's were considered high for an album. Critics have gotten WAY too safe with certain artists. It's pretty much across the board (except for people who have always been considered a joke to critics like Katy, Bieber, JLo, etc)
Virgos Groove Posted April 22 Posted April 22 4 minutes ago, Peroxide said: Yeah I really think in 5 years time this album is going to be held in a very different light… let them cast stones. The fans are happy… that's the main thing. Oh, it will... Trust me, it will... 1
chosensparkles Posted April 22 Posted April 22 Just now, kwek_kwek said: I just realized, .5 is 5%. I was thinking it's a 50. Lol. 0.5/5 so it's a 20/100 5 7
.thumb.gif.69950d48f19048d3568db954960ad6f2.gif)
Recommended Posts