Jump to content

The Tortured Poets Department Review Thread | MC - 76


Recommended Posts

Posted

no because sputinik was such a troll for this

not them giving a 90 just to give a 48 and a 10 hours later

 

arifn13-girl.gif

  • Haha 12

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Raspberries

    28

  • DLW

    26

  • Cloröx

    24

  • Virgos Groove

    24

Posted

XEKajnk.png

 

:deadbanana: 

Posted

i LOVE Sputnik

 

abba7bb20e8261e98df0edd429e4d25f6d44a393

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Sugden said:

no because sputinik was such a troll for this

not them giving a 90 just to give a 48 and a 10 hours later

 

arifn13-girl.gif

They saw her reposted the 100s but ignored their 90. 

spacer.png

Edited by tomo
  • Haha 7
Posted

not a 0.5 review

arifn13-girl.gif

 

Spoiler

still too high

arifn13-girl.gif

 

Posted

Funny how Rob Sheffield trying to hawk his book via his review was fine but now that they got hit with the 0.5, journalism is dead. 

 

I believe I was told Karma is a cat.

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 8
Posted
Just now, Sugden said:

no because sputinik was such a troll for this

not them giving a 90 just to give a 48 and a 10 hours later

 

arifn13-girl.gif

Maybe the first one is a stan but afraid to give it a 100.  
 

spacer.png

Posted (edited)

I don't think I have ever seen an album that has this huge of a rảnge in scores. Yeah sure albums like BTW or BTD had 1 or 2 pretentious and obnoxious critics giving them a 0 just out of spite and stupidity, but with this album it's completely different, like critics are divided into 2 distinctive groups.

Edited by duybeeGAshantiGA
Posted
Just now, tomo said:

They saw she reposted the 100s but ignored their 90. 

:clack:

Sputnik:

 

albert-einstein-lewis-strauss.gif

  • Haha 10
Posted
2 minutes ago, kwek_kwek said:

I think so. Born This Way had two reviews from sputnik and both were counted. 

I-

imagem-2024-04-22-162038068.png

 

:rip:

Posted

What is happening :deadbanana:

Posted

 

 

 

Posted


 

The Tortured Tummy Defartment

 

spacer.png

Posted
1 hour ago, Taylor fanboy said:

Poptimism is considered bad in ATRL of all places? :rip:

some stans seem to not understand that poptimism is a good thing since pop music used to be unfairly criticized 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
30 minutes ago, VeniceBeach said:

48/100 from Sputnik for the standard version, counts for Metacritic

https://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/88489/Taylor-Swift-The-Tortured-Poets-Department/

 

6 minutes ago, Sugden said:

spacer.png
 

not a 0.5

 

spacer.png

 

 

I don't know what's funnier, the reviews or @omrimayo having a meltdown every time a new one comes in. 

  • Haha 8
Posted
1 minute ago, duybeeGAshantiGA said:

I don't think I have ever seen an album that has this huge of a rảnge in scores. Yeah sure albums like BTW or BTD had 1 or 2 pretentious and obnoxious critics giving them a 0 just out of spice and stupidity, but with this album it's completely different, like critics are divided into 2 distinctive groups.

some received the cheque and some didn't

 

:clack:

  • Haha 2
Posted

0.5 is insane like this is straight up hating be for real :dies:

Posted
2 minutes ago, duybeeGAshantiGA said:

I don't think I have ever seen an album that has this huge of a rảnge in scores. Yeah sure albums like BTW or BTD had 1 or 2 pretentious and obnoxious critics giving them a 0 just out of spite and stupidity, but with this album it's completely different, like critics are divided into 2 distinctive groups.

Agreed.

One being the ones who have actually  listened to the album and the others being the ones who had their reviews ready before they even listened to any of the songs

You know whos who

 

:suburban:

Posted
4 minutes ago, Jay07 said:

Funny how Rob Sheffield trying to hawk his book via his review was fine but now that they got hit with the 0.5, journalism is dead. 

 

I believe I was told Karma is a cat.

You are a BRITNEY SPEARS fan in a thread about critical acclaim

  • Haha 3
  • Thumbs Down 7
Posted

Screaming at Sputnik. Maybe Rolling Stone should serve a second review not written by an interested party too.

 

falldown.gif?ex=6627f935&is=6626a7b5&hm=

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Venice B said:

0.5 is insane like this is straight up hating be for real :dies:

It's just to balance out the straight up stanning be for real.

Edited by duybeeGAshantiGA
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, V$. said:

I-

imagem-2024-04-22-162038068.png

 

:rip:

Not over a week later :rip: What a joke

Posted

I miss the days when 70's were considered high for an album. Critics have gotten WAY too safe with certain artists.

  • Like 3
Posted
14 minutes ago, Sugden said:

No longer is she concerned with capturing a universal feeling and catchy choruses that conjure the magic necessary to turn household objects into microphones. Instead, Taylor opts for interchangeable melodies that never really threaten to take attention away from the lyrics, which function more as tabloid clarification than earnest poetry. 

 

They made several points here, you can count proper hooks on the album on one hand and even then you'll have few fingers unused.

 

:suburban:

  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

Are we getting second reviews by the same publication every fortnight?

 

:ryan3:

 

 

Edited by Taylor fanboy
  • Haha 3
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.