BrandNewBrandon Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 (edited) Madame Web is a big bomb at the box office but will bring sh!tloads of people to watch in for free on streaming. Same as streaming smashes like Jennifer Lopez' The Mother and Chris Hemsworth's Extraction movies could've been box office bombs if released in theatres. You get the picture. So with that in mind, which of these streaming giants would be the least successful if it was only in stores to buy for $10-$15 each? SZA - SOS Ariana Grande - Eternal Sunshine Morgan Wallen - Dangerous: The Double Album Taylor Swift - Midnights The Weeknd - After Hours Bad Bunny - Un Verano Sin Ti Discuss and keep it cute. Edited March 27 by BrandNewBrandon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fitzswiftie Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 All of them except Mid-nights. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aethereal Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Bad Bunny easily. But all of them would do less in pure sales era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glamthony Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Bad bunny, his music is for poor people and poor people can't afford to buy music. They only listen to him between spotify ads. 3 2 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JO1s Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Bad bunny considering how his tour is doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JO1s Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Just now, Glamthony said: Bad bunny, his music is for poor people and poor people can't afford to buy music. They only listen to him between spotify ads. This ain't it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kataraqueen Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 2 minutes ago, Glamthony said: Bad bunny, his music is for poor people and poor people can't afford to buy music. They only listen to him between spotify ads. .......... girl i---------------------- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shyboi Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 2 minutes ago, Glamthony said: Bad bunny, his music is for poor people and poor people can't afford to buy music. They only listen to him between spotify ads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LustSpell Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Glamthony said: Bad bunny, his music is for poor people and poor people can't afford to buy music. They only listen to him between spotify ads. This is incredibly classist. A blatant example of needing to shut the f uck up and keep your words to yourself. OT: Bad Bunny. At one point his album sold like 20-30 physicals in a week, but had like 60k SPS Edited March 27 by LustSpell 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoundsandSongs Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Bad Bunny would lose the most proportionally, Taylor would still on top - she is still and was always a physical album seller queen. Her fanbase is the largest most dedicated out of the above so no matter how bad sales get she'll still do massive numbers. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastedpotential Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 (edited) nnnn Midnights has, conservatively, moved 3-4M pure units worldwide (and to the best of my knowledge is sitting at like 2.8M+ in the US, I hope someone will correct me if I'm underestimating), and is one of the (if not the) best selling records of this decade If it wasn't on streaming I fear it would be a sales smash. I can't say the same for some of the other albums you mention. As for which will lose the most, probably UVST, followed by ES, then SOS, then After Hours, and then Dangerous which also had some very strong pure sales. Edited March 27 by wastedpotential 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punisher Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 in order from most affected to least affected Bad Bunny The Weeknd Ariana Morgan SZA Taylor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoisonedIvy Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Idk but Taylor wouldn't be affected at all, she's just as capable of moving pure sales as she is in streaming <3 Has been that way for nearly 2 decades now. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aethereal Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 7 minutes ago, punisher said: in order from most affected to least affected Bad Bunny The Weeknd Ariana Morgan SZA Taylor I would put Morgan above SZA. Maybe SZA would be more of a singles-artists. Also nearly all of Morgan streams come from North America where album sales are the highest so. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankvert Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 18 minutes ago, Glamthony said: Bad bunny, his music is for poor people and poor people can't afford to buy music. They only listen to him between spotify ads. This is so wrong but the brashness really took me by surprise 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Cash Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 18 minutes ago, Glamthony said: Bad bunny, his music is for poor people and poor people can't afford to buy music. They only listen to him between spotify ads. This is pretty racist OT: Bad Bunny 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EnigmaticAndroid Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 20 minutes ago, Glamthony said: Bad bunny, his music is for poor people and poor people can't afford to buy music. They only listen to him between spotify ads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machete Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 12 minutes ago, punisher said: in order from most affected to least affected Bad Bunny The Weeknd Ariana Morgan SZA Taylor Morgan's album literally outsold SOS x10 in pure so him above her is a choice OT: Bad Bunny, but who cares it is 2024 not 1994. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
queenoftheclouds Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 SZA wouldn't pull of huge physical Numbers Like Wallen does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
naval23 Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 MID-nights Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bliaz Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 34 minutes ago, Glamthony said: Bad bunny, his music is for poor people and poor people can't afford to buy music. They only listen to him between spotify ads. I would put it differently. Most people who listen to Bad Bunny have the mentality of "why pay for music when I can have it for free" whether it's on YouTube or Spotify. It seems like a waste of money to them. I'm from Mexico and I can assure you that many people think that way, even if they have money. But your comment has a point, although it sounds cruel, most of the people who listen to Bad Bunny's music are from a low social stratum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punisher Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 20 minutes ago, Machete said: Morgan's album literally outsold SOS x10 in pure so him above her is a choice OT: Bad Bunny, but who cares it is 2024 not 1994. sorry but i do not keep up with morgan wallen pure sales 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheep Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 wtf is going on in here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
queenoftheclouds Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 Wallen is huge in streaming but without it He could pull Big Numbers. His pure Sales from Chartmasters If I Know Me 242,500 Dangerous: The Double Album 507,500 One Thing at a Time 372,500 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devin Posted March 27 Share Posted March 27 53 minutes ago, Glamthony said: Bad bunny, his music is for poor people and poor people can't afford to buy music. They only listen to him between spotify ads. im sorry? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.5c069777b1ab1d704a32825806767213.png)
Recommended Posts