ChrisTheLoner Posted March 16 Posted March 16 1 hour ago, paulie said: the hate for james charles is so Zzzz He’s literally a PREDATOR but go off I guess ot: There was no spillage whatsoever, TiktTok is trash and should be banned (just like James should be banned from being near minors) 1
ElectricStyle Posted March 16 Posted March 16 he spilled but it’s not a controversial or different take at all.. it is f ing stupid they are going after tiktok when there are way bigger and more important issues out there. if you don’t agree with that then you have brain rot. and the fact this is under biden administration is 10x more embarrassing , what a wolf in sheep’s clothing 1 1
Vixen Eyes Posted March 16 Posted March 16 1 hour ago, Gorjesspazze9 said: How long would it take for them to ban it tho? Like will we wake up on a random Tuesday and the app is deleted from phones/inacessible. Would be kinda wild just like flappy bird i guess
TedLasso Posted March 16 Posted March 16 (edited) If by “he made points” you mean he knows how to watch political TikTok’s and retain that information then yeah, he made point. Anyone and everyone (from both parties) criticizes the government and what bills it chooses to pass and how important it is to vote. Anyway, the interviewer should’ve asked which “war we should not be in” he was referring to, since we are actively engaged in multiple at the moment. Edited March 16 by TedLasso 1
50thStateofMind Posted March 16 Posted March 16 (edited) Well, can’t lie, he f****** spilled Edited March 16 by 50thStateofMind
ImpressMeMuch Posted March 16 Posted March 16 (edited) 2 hours ago, paulie said: the hate for james charles is so Zzzz He’s a groomer and a predator so, no it’s not Edited March 16 by ImpressMeMuch 1
ImpressMeMuch Posted March 16 Posted March 16 1 hour ago, Maroonx said: the only reason why I support this tiktok ban is to end these trashy influencers... I am so over these fake ass bishes That’s not how it works nor what the ban is about lol, they will all just shift to an alternative
Specter Posted March 16 Posted March 16 HEARTBREAKING: The worst person you know just made a great point
Johnny Jacobs Posted March 16 Posted March 16 This hoe aint even mad at tiktok This hoe is mad at Megan's law. He should stop texting minors. He belong in a jail cell with Jeffree Stsr as a bunk buddy 2
Happylittlepunk Posted March 16 Posted March 16 I hope they ban it so we don’t have too see him ever again online.
mrpartyrocker Posted March 16 Posted March 16 He spilled but can these rich ass superficial people stop with the “we are starving, we are dying, we’re in a war” when you don’t know what it’s like to go through any of that 3
xXavril Posted March 16 Posted March 16 (edited) 4 hours ago, Gorjesspazze9 said: How long would it take for them to ban it tho? Like will we wake up on a random Tuesday and the app is deleted from phones/inacessible. Would be kinda wild no the senate has said they aren’t rushing the bill, so they’re going to discuss it amongst themselves for (I think) 3 or 4 days. And then IF they pass the bill, Biden has to sign it (which he has said he will) and THEN TikTok has (I think) 120 or so days to not be associates with it’s current owner, Bytedance. If they don’t sell it (which they won’t, America makes up 10% of the user base and isn’t worth it for them to sell) then it’ll be banned. OT: Ban James Charles!! Edited March 16 by xXavril
midnightdawn Posted March 17 Posted March 17 He's just repeating the talking points Tiktok has been giving out for influencers to parrot. Even the claim that "we are in a war we should not be in" is a Chinese/Russian talking point. 1
John Slayne Posted March 17 Posted March 17 6 minutes ago, midnightdawn said: Even the claim that "we are in a war we should not be in" is a Chinese/Russian talking point. i thought this was a reference to supporting Israel? which I know that the US is technically not *in* the war but is sending billions of dollars and arms to Israel and Biden pledged 'unconditional' support to them despite the obvious human rights violations, which is a big yikes. so the point stands
midnightdawn Posted March 17 Posted March 17 14 minutes ago, John Slayne said: i thought this was a reference to supporting Israel? which I know that the US is technically not *in* the war but is sending billions of dollars and arms to Israel and Biden pledged 'unconditional' support to them despite the obvious human rights violations, which is a big yikes. so the point stands Well it could be either war. In any case, I have zero interest in hearing about his opinions on major global conflicts, as well as the congressional processes.
Movimento Perpétuo Posted March 17 Posted March 17 I totally forgot about him but his annoying ass spilled
Recommended Posts