Enzo Posted February 22 Posted February 22 Movie stars get paid even more money after the movie drops when reaching milestones & bonuses if a movie is a hit 1
Maroonx Posted February 22 Posted February 22 She's a really good actress though. I mean, she played the role of a singer for years and people believed her. give ha an academy award x 7 1
ericcartman Posted February 22 Posted February 22 That's great to be honest and good for her. She doesn't even have to put in work, she's got it made. However something like that cheapens your legacy so it comes at a cost hence the price tag. I'm sure some of the hot singers can make big money doing Playboy or onlyfans or whatever too. 2
Phaunzie Posted February 22 Posted February 22 46 minutes ago, Lüwís said: Well, these things would certainly be important factors if someone wants to continue touring late into their career. Particularly if you're not known for being an incredible performer or having a great voice. I wouldn't sacrifice any of my hard earned $25,000,000 to finance tours that are likely to have ever-dwindling crowds. What Hudson needed to do years ago was build upon her legacy as an artist. Perhaps she might try to do that next. Who knows, maybe things will turn around for her in the near future. Otherwise, she'll remain as she is now: fabulous for a throwback. She might have a hit song or two left in her, but she'll definitely struggle to be heard. 25,0000,000 x 7 = 175,000,000 #MusicNottheBling i.e be like Madonna and not hoard all the wealth What is wrong with her spending her money? She was already loaded before now she has excess amount of wealth. She doesn't need to prove herself as an artist. She is in her best years, life after pop stardom. No Katycat should care if this girl gets another #1 or a grammy. All we want is new music and drama to kiki to. It sucks that her existence bothers you so much, but like another fabulous for a throwback icon, she is always here. And since you care so much about her chart position, maybe apply for a position at UNSUB Records. I heard they are hiring.
CoolNebraskaGuy Posted February 22 Posted February 22 (edited) It's called ad revenue, babes! American Idol is nothing but a hollow vessel for ads. Gaga is getting paid millions to do something she loves and is being constantly celebrated for it. Don't get me wrong- I love Ms. Hudson-Bloom, but does she love making American Idol? A show that peaked more than a decade ago and has ever-dwindling relevance in the popular culture? Is it doing anything for her musical career? I think she's just there to cash cheques, and that's fine! There's nothing wrong with that. But let's not pretend this is something that it's not. We're all smarter than that. Edited February 22 by CoolNebraskaGuy 3
Twilish Posted February 22 Posted February 22 I’m more surprised the usual suspects in here still can’t keep Katy out of their minds! Why would she needs fans when her haters double as both! 1
Leptine Posted February 22 Posted February 22 Being a movie star will always remain more prestigious and respected than doing some cheap trashy reality-talent shows, no matter the paid. 5 1
Just a Gay on ATRL Posted February 22 Posted February 22 She's grossly overpaid, period. All of these TV judges are, but she may be the worst case. 2
Cameltoe Chariot Posted February 22 Posted February 22 1 hour ago, frankvert said: A literal comparison of each lady’s respective career state. Reminder that money can’t buy happiness, talent, respect, or a legacy Gaga: Katy: 2
concubine Posted February 22 Posted February 22 (edited) 36 minutes ago, Just a Gay on ATRL said: She's grossly overpaid, period. All of these TV judges are, but she may be the worst case. This - I'm shocked at the 25M number if that's true. Like.. it's just Katy Perry wtf Does she really bring that much viewership and clout to the show? Edited February 22 by concubine
Happylittlepunk Posted February 22 Posted February 22 2 hours ago, Phaunzie said: Who needs actual sales, charts or attendance, when you can sit, talk and be on tv for 25 million per season. Some artists haven't made that much in their entire career, babes. How very kindnesspunk of you. Let's not forget she also did Vegas and certainly has enough to finance her own tour. Executive control for Katy Queen, we love to see it. You mean that same Vegas show which underperformed and Vegas acts with less hits than Katy. Manage to do 2X better than her like Britney and JLO. All those hits did nothing for Katy career in the end.
Happylittlepunk Posted February 22 Posted February 22 3 hours ago, SylMacPer said: sales, chart or attendance would pay less than 25M/year and requires more work babes! Try again! You can only bring money into this for Katy from a dying tv show because Katy absolutely has nothing else going for her. It’s quite sad that she give up on career so easily.
Lüwís Posted February 22 Posted February 22 1 hour ago, Phaunzie said: 25,0000,000 x 7 = 175,000,000 #MusicNottheBling i.e be like Madonna and not hoard all the wealth What is wrong with her spending her money? She was already loaded before now she has excess amount of wealth. She doesn't need to prove herself as an artist. She is in her best years, life after pop stardom. No Katycat should care if this girl gets another #1 or a grammy. All we want is new music and drama to kiki to. It sucks that her existence bothers you so much, but like another fabulous for a throwback icon, she is always here. And since you care so much about her chart position, maybe apply for a position at UNSUB Records. I heard they are hiring. Hi there, Phaunzie. You seem a little upset in your response, so I'll try to be as polite as possible, sweet pea. I wouldn't want to upset you further. Some things in your post seem a little contradictory. You gave me a multiplication lesson followed with a reference to lyrics from the title song of Lady GaGa's ARTPOP; 'Music not the bling' suggests to me that artistry, namely music, is more important than money. So, was your point to say that money is the more important of the two things? If so, I think that was already pointed out in your previous posts in this thread. As for Madonna (a wonderful artiste), I'm not sure why her name was mentioned here at all. Madame Hudson can absolutely spend her own money however she wants. My point was that it wouldn't make sense to finance tours if fewer and fewer people are going to turn up. Sure, she could finance smaller tours as time goes on but arenas are likely to get harder to fill if she's not going to improve things. She's known for putting on extravagant shows, sure, but she is definitely not known for being a great performer or a great singer. That wasn't me being 'shady' or critical, it's just a fact. She's not a girl, she a grown woman who has had great success as an artist but I don't see why she should stop building upon her legacy at all. Would you really want your favourite artist to be remembered as a talent show judge or a great artist? I can tell you want music from her but it's quite strange that you've openly admitted that you 'want drama'. If her next singles and albums don't do well, I'm sure you'll get some drama but not the kind you want. I do not care at all about Madame Hudson's chart positions. I could not care less - meaning, her chart positions don't bother me in any way. My point was that she needs some success, whether it's a song or album that gets to number one, two, three, twenty-five, whatever - she will need some decent hits (hit songs don't necessarily reach the top position) to continue touring as a bigger artist. I suspect she might feel the same way (I don't know, I'm not in her head) as she herself recently implied that she doesn't want to be called a 'flop' again. This other person who you say is fabulous for a throwback - I'll presume it's Lady GaGa as she seems to upset you - sure, she's not as popular as she once was, but she's building on her legacy as an artist. She's still doing things that are a tad more noteworthy than others from her peak era. Hudon's existence does not bother me at all. She's no threat to me, she lives in a different country, we don't know each other at all. We have no connection. She's done nothing to me, so why would I be wishing she didn't exist? That's a bit odd to suggest! She's not my favourite artist ever but I still love 'One of the Boys' and I have 21 other songs of hers in my liked songs on Spotify. That's more than a lot of ther artists. So, no, her existence doesn't upset me one bit. I've never once heard of 'UNSUB Records'. Also, I'm already employed in the banking industry, so I don't need to check them out right now. Thanks for the recommendation, though. I'm rooting for Madame Hudson, too. Enjoy your day / evening, wherever you are 1
wesleywalrus Posted February 22 Posted February 22 She wont ever be seen as a serious musician or actress, but good for her. 1 2 1
Njshawty Posted February 22 Posted February 22 3 hours ago, Kimmo said: 20 millions for one whole season vs One movie… yeah ok.. Exactly u can have two or three movies like Beyonce got $30 million just from one 45 second Verizon commercial 😱😱😱😱 let that sink in lol
Njshawty Posted February 22 Posted February 22 30 minutes ago, Pheromosa said: thats less than bey's dubai performance 🤣🤣🤣 and her Verizon commercial
ATRL Moderator supaspaz Posted February 22 ATRL Moderator Posted February 22 4 hours ago, Cameltoe Chariot said: a lowbrow basic cable show It’s on broadcast television.
znake Posted February 22 Posted February 22 Stupid atrl , keep pressed 25 million per season is more than what your ugly and silly faves win in 2-3 eras stupid replies like , I prefer 12 million than 25 million sure jan 3 4
False God Posted February 22 Posted February 22 (edited) 3 hours ago, Kimmo said: 20 millions for one whole season vs One movie… yeah ok.. a movie takes months to make, same like 1 season lol Edited February 22 by False God
znake Posted February 22 Posted February 22 2 hours ago, Just a Gay on ATRL said: She's grossly overpaid, period. All of these TV judges are, but she may be the worst case. No, you silly member she deserves her check , the other 3 judges received half of $$$$ , so no all TV judges are overpaid 3
Jay07 Posted February 22 Posted February 22 4 hours ago, Dula Peep said: more work? to sit there in her chair and give her opinion on someone singing? No because it's a longer time commitment.
Recommended Posts