ATRL Moderator feelslikeadream Posted February 19 ATRL Moderator Posted February 19 The video in the OP is perfectly fine; she just started her answer by reminding viewers about the importance of voting Of all the actually awful clips you could use for that caption, this is definitely not it. 3 4 1 2
GraceRandolph Posted February 19 Author Posted February 19 4 minutes ago, feelslikeadream said: The video in the OP is perfectly fine; she just started her answer by reminding viewers about the importance of voting Of all the actually awful clips you could use for that caption, this is definitely not it. 3 4
Zefierce Posted February 19 Posted February 19 8 minutes ago, feelslikeadream said: The video in the OP is perfectly fine; she just started her answer by reminding viewers about the importance of voting Of all the actually awful clips you could use for that caption, this is definitely not it. Are you trolling? There's no possible way you genuinely think that was a fine answer because... A good answer would be listing out objectives she's passionate about and wants to accomplish in the next term and getting people hyped to get out there to vote, she basically said "I don't have an answer for that, just vote for me anyways". She would've been better off not doing the interview at all. 1 5 1 1
kexin Posted February 19 Posted February 19 9 minutes ago, GraceRandolph said: Worry about stanning a grifting fraud who steals their scoops from other insiders & spreads fake leaks OT: Kamala pretty much gave a nothing answer for PR and bounced around the question. Obviously the Roe reversal is a top priority but it can take a whole generation to get there. 1
Taylena Posted February 19 Posted February 19 Why anyone votes for these people is beyond my comprehension. 1
ATRL Moderator feelslikeadream Posted February 19 ATRL Moderator Posted February 19 31 minutes ago, Zefierce said: Are you trolling? There's no possible way you genuinely think that was a fine answer because... A good answer would be listing out objectives she's passionate about and wants to accomplish in the next term and getting people hyped to get out there to vote, she basically said "I don't have an answer for that, just vote for me anyways". She would've been better off not doing the interview at all. Sis, this is clearly how she STARTS the answer. The clip stops abruptly when it looks like she's finished talking about voting and is just about to give her actual answer. Is she a bad politician? Yes! Will I be voting for her and Joe? No. But that doesn't change the fact that this specific clip is clearly cut off at a weird spot and isn't that bad.
byzantium Posted February 19 Posted February 19 I’d vote for her. Is she my first choice? No, Is she my second choice? No, …is she my 432,746th choice? No, ….is she my 12,463,824th choice? No But she at least satisfies the bare minimum standard to make me vote for her unlike Biden. 2 1
GhostBox Posted February 19 Posted February 19 1 hour ago, feelslikeadream said: The video in the OP is perfectly fine; she just started her answer by reminding viewers about the importance of voting Of all the actually awful clips you could use for that caption, this is definitely not it. ^Only thing that needs said
Armani? Posted February 19 Posted February 19 10 hours ago, feelslikeadream said: The video in the OP is perfectly fine; she just started her answer by reminding viewers about the importance of voting Of all the actually awful clips you could use for that caption, this is definitely not it. She said a whole lot of nothing She couldn't give one substantial thing to vote for Biden 1
ATRL Moderator feelslikeadream Posted February 19 ATRL Moderator Posted February 19 16 minutes ago, Armani? said: She said a whole lot of nothing She couldn't give one substantial thing to vote for Biden As I said literally three posts up, this is how she STARTS the answer. Before giving her actual answer, she prefaces it with talking about the importance of voting. How is that not clear from how the video is edited to end abruptly? The clip also cuts out the fact that the interviewer is asking what they can do about abortion rights, specifically. It's simply cut on both ends in an attempt to make her answer look weird. In the full clip, she continues on to answer more fully. Is it a brilliant response? No. But this edit of the clip is designed to make her look worse and people falling for it are giving media illiteracy. 2
Recommended Posts