CottageHore Posted February 16 Posted February 16 1 hour ago, stupidjock said: Wouldn’t it be easier to just do porn/onlyfans? At least it would make her profit and there won’t be bad music involved God y’all are so insufferable lighten tf up 6 2 5
Orsay Posted February 16 Posted February 16 It’s kinda cool. The ass cleavage and depicting the man in a submissive position like that giving head Too bad the music is complete ****! 1
DuffStan Posted February 16 Posted February 16 The official cover is hot af so the label was right (this one time)
Kim Petrat Posted February 16 Posted February 16 you people act like we’re getting these visuals from fiona apple or something her visuals are GORG if you wanna listen to something more “wholesome” there’s a whole league of other boring pop girls with old maiden imagery you can enjoy instead! 8 1 3
Venice B Posted February 16 Posted February 16 It's so sad to see what she's become. She had a lot of potential, sad! 1 1 1
Trent W Posted February 16 Posted February 16 1 hour ago, Cain said: It looks good, the puritan outrage in here If you’re a popstar or marketed as one, this is extremely vulgar and in very bad taste Especially because it reaches and audience that is not necessarily looking for this imagery If she wants to sell this type of content she can just do porn or join only fans The problem is not the content, the problem is that she’s supposed to be a popstar 1 5 3
flower moon Posted February 16 Posted February 16 i mean i can see why they denied it but its quite pretty 2
SupremeGoddess Posted February 16 Posted February 16 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Kim Petrat said: you people act like we’re getting these visuals from fiona apple or something her visuals are GORG if you wanna listen to something more “wholesome” there’s a whole league of other boring pop girls with old maiden imagery you can enjoy instead! “boring pop girls” because they aren’t screeching in a dr rapist production about sucking cock kim petra stans are SO deranged i s2g that **** music must have fried their brains OT: **** cover, **** music, **** artist yikes at least she got enough budget to make a flop record i guess Edited February 16 by SupremeGoddess 7 3 1 5
flower moon Posted February 16 Posted February 16 6 minutes ago, Trent W said: If you’re a popstar or marketed as one, this is extremely vulgar and in very bad taste Especially because it reaches and audience that is not necessarily looking for this imagery If she wants to sell this type of content she can just do porn or join only fans The problem is not the content, the problem is that she’s supposed to be a popstar 1 6
Cain Posted February 16 Posted February 16 9 minutes ago, Trent W said: If you’re a popstar or marketed as one, this is extremely vulgar and in very bad taste Especially because it reaches and audience that is not necessarily looking for this imagery If she wants to sell this type of content she can just do porn or join only fans The problem is not the content, the problem is that she’s supposed to be a popstar You’re such a small minded conservative all over this forum. If you’re a popstar it means you can do whatever the **** you want because people trust in you enough that you get paid (lavishly) to execute your vision I can’t believe I’m going to ride for Kim Petras but here we go. Kim actually trying something new (for puritan hypocritical Americans I guess, because in Europe we actually have female artists breaking boundaries on sexuality like this) is more useful for society than lame cookie cutter lanelpuppet #3858383 trying to be marketable. Her reaching an audience that isn’t looking for this content will actually get the needle going. Whatever you think a popstar is ‘supposed’ to be is none of the business of the people actually being popstars and doing what they like You’re a puritan womanhater for telling women to do porn if they dare be ‘too vulgar’ in their art in your opinion, even though I know you love to see yourself as a ‘respectable’ centrist 6 9 5
Witchpop Posted February 16 Posted February 16 1 hour ago, Tropical said: Everything about S1ut Pop Miami has honestly been iconic and gorgeous. The way she fills up these pages with HASTE https://www.kimxxxxx.com/ is the most iconic site As if they wouldn't be absolutely gagging if any other pop girl did it
Yawn Posted February 16 Posted February 16 the visuals for the project have been 10/10 - fun, she looks amazing and with a great aesthetic! not sure why you girls have to lie to yourselves. let’s not be delusional now.. but whatever makes you all feel better! 1 2
SupremeGoddess Posted February 16 Posted February 16 15 minutes ago, Cain said: You’re such a small minded conservative all over this forum. If you’re a popstar it means you can do whatever the **** you want because people trust in you enough that you get paid (lavishly) to execute your vision I can’t believe I’m going to ride for Kim Petras but here we go. Kim actually trying something new (for puritan hypocritical Americans I guess, because in Europe we actually have female artists breaking boundaries on sexuality like this) is more useful for society than lame cookie cutter lanelpuppet #3858383 trying to be marketable. Her reaching an audience that isn’t looking for this content will actually get the needle going. Whatever you think a popstar is ‘supposed’ to be is none of the business of the people actually being popstars and doing what they like You’re a puritan womanhater for telling women to do porn if they dare be ‘too vulgar’ in their art in your opinion, even though I know you love to see yourself as a ‘respectable’ centrist “woman hater” proceeds to defend a known rapist supporter the jokes just write themselves 1 1 5
Trent W Posted February 17 Posted February 17 15 minutes ago, Cain said: You’re such a small minded conservative all over this forum. If you’re a popstar it means you can do whatever the **** you want because people trust in you enough that you get paid (lavishly) to execute your vision I can’t believe I’m going to ride for Kim Petras but here we go. Kim actually trying something new (for puritan hypocritical Americans I guess, because in Europe we actually have female artists breaking boundaries on sexuality like this) is more useful for society than lame cookie cutter lanelpuppet #3858383 trying to be marketable. Her reaching an audience that isn’t looking for this content will actually get the needle going. Whatever you think a popstar is ‘supposed’ to be is none of the business of the people actually being popstars and doing what they like You’re a puritan womanhater for telling women to do porn if they dare be ‘too vulgar’ in their art in your opinion, even though I know you love to see yourself as a ‘respectable’ centrist Why are you so angry? You need therapy. A pop star can do whatever they want, but anyone managing a business don’t want *****graphy as the cover of their product, so it’s understandable why a label would reject that as a cover they are investing in. And also a pop star and a *****grapher is 2 different things, she can switch careers whenever she wants
Witchpop Posted February 17 Posted February 17 Just now, SupremeGoddess said: “woman hater” proceeds to defend a known rapist supporter the jokes just write themselves Do you always spend this much energy on people you don't like? It's simple to not engage with things you don't like... 1
Cain Posted February 17 Posted February 17 1 minute ago, SupremeGoddess said: “woman hater” proceeds to defend a known rapist supporter the jokes just write themselves Love the limited internet logic of ‘person x did something bad! Therefore hatred towards them that is a projection of general societal inequality cannot be criticised!’ This is larger than Kim (who’s known to be a bad person), but she now happens to be the topic of discussion of something that’s been happening for decades, which is why she’s being used as an example
Cain Posted February 17 Posted February 17 6 minutes ago, Trent W said: Why are you so angry? You need therapy. A pop star can do whatever they want, but anyone managing a business don’t want *****graphy as the cover of their product, so it’s understandable why a label would reject that as a cover they are investing in. And also a pop star and a *****grapher is 2 different things, she can switch careers whenever she wants Cause you’re telling a woman to go do porn? Because of the art she puts out? That’s disgusting behavior for a man and far too radical of a reaction for something as small as an unused album cover But nice ‘i’m such a respectable moderate by calling other people too emotional’ trope 1
Mke1979 Posted February 17 Posted February 17 I really wish Kim gave us TOTL volume 3 era instead of - this! She really shines on dark pop songs like TOTL series. This is too polarizing.
Recommended Posts