Jump to content

Flowers keeps ahead of yes, and? on Spotify Global Charts. Why?


Recommended Posts

Posted

because it’s actually a good song

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Jjang

    19

  • corotinho

    12

  • Miley Cyrus

    9

  • playwithme

    7

Posted
On 2/15/2024 at 3:16 PM, pika said:

Miley spent a majority of the streaming era either being mismanaged by her label/team or releasing music that wouldn’t succeed on Spotify to begin with (Dead Petz, Younger Now). Of course her daily numbers are gonna suffer when her career peak was years before any of this existed and 1 single alone won’t fix those career decisions. :rip: So for Flowers to not only curb stomp yes and, but outdo every Ariana single ever released is embarrassing.

 

Notice how the second she doesn’t have Scooter and the goodwill of what Manchester/Mac Miller brought, she’s a very fragile artist. She already wasn’t likable as a person (donut incident) and now people are seeing it again with how she addresses cheating scandals.

 

Hopefully that CGI vomit Wicked movie does well cause if Ariana isn’t successful, there’s nothing to like about her.

i find it funny how quickly people forgot what being without Scooter during Focus/Dangerous Woman era did to her lmao

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Robburro said:

i find it funny how quickly people forgot what being without Scooter during Focus/Dangerous Woman era did to her lmao

I find it funny how quickly people forgot where Miley's career was between Bangerz and Flowers (The album).
 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 3
  • Thumbs Down 7
Posted

One is a bop and the other trash 

that’s why :giraffe:

Posted
On 2/15/2024 at 6:34 AM, Scars said:

Flowers' second wind is just so impressive to see. What a classic. :jonny:

 

Well, to answer OP, Flowers is bigger than any Ariana Grande song and YA definitely won't be the one to change that.

Your first spill

 

 :clack:

Posted

Flowers is bigger than entire Ariana career, if Miley didn't spend 10 years with flop RCA where she wasn't even getting radio for masterpieces as midnight sky, she would've achieve more if she left them earlier but i feel like it's just a new beginning for her and she will keep grow and will get more grammys in the future. Critics and general public are loving her now, can't say about the other one. Feels like she used all her potential and keeps making immature songs 

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

As someone who is a fan of both, Flowers is a pop classic from the bigger artist. 

Posted (edited)

Because flowers is more palatable, commercial and generic. It could have been sung by anyone and it would still be a hit. Not much artistry here, I fear.


Yes, And? is inherently more risky, esp. with the long intro and the diff sound for Ari - plus its also trying to address a narrative. The song is very her and I don't think anyone but Ari could have pulled it off. It's a testament to her power and the hype of her return that its charting decently esp. with all the home-wrecking allegations.

I feel like we would be having a different conversation if Ariana decided to drop something more obvious like 'Fantasize.'

Edited by tetrachord
  • Confused 1
  • Thumbs Down 3
Posted
On 2/15/2024 at 4:54 PM, Scars said:

No, that's not the real question. The thread makes a comparison between these girls' latest lead singles. I hate to give it to this OP, which isn't even a Miley stan, but you know they've made their point when people start going off-topic. :rip:

 

Yes, we all know that Ariana is a much bigger streaming force than Miley, which explains her having a far larger catalog of hits. I'm sure anyone who follows charts is aware of that. But at the end of the day, Miley debuted nearly two decades ago, long before Spotify, Ariana, and even the woman in your avi. She still ranks above all her ex-act peers, including Ariana, on any credible estimation for Billboard's Greatest Artists of All Time, and she's comfortably ahead in overall career sales—not just pure sales but overall consumption units—than any of them. Let's all take a moment to log out from Chartmasters and remember that it isn't a credible source for chart data.

 

Regarding commercial viability, I don't think Miley has much left to prove, regardless of what happens from here. She already has a respectable amount of classics that have left a mark on music. She doesn’t need a second Flowers, the girls are still trying to achieve their first.

clock :clap3:that :clap3:tea

Posted
3 hours ago, tetrachord said:

Because flowers is more palatable, commercial and generic. It could have been sung by anyone and it would still be a hit. Not much artistry here, I fear.


Yes, And? is inherently more risky, esp. with the long intro and the diff sound for Ari - plus its also trying to address a narrative. The song is very her and I don't think anyone but Ari could have pulled it off. It's a testament to her power and the hype of her return that its charting decently esp. with all the home-wrecking allegations.

I feel like we would be having a different conversation if Ariana decided to drop something more obvious like 'Fantasize.'

The delusion :suburban:

  • Haha 2
Posted

flowers its becoming one of the biggest song this century fr

Posted

yes, and? is a commercial failure

Posted

She can buy her own flowers.

Ariana just sells makeup.

  • Haha 2
Posted

Arianators : "But Flowers smashed not Miley !!!"

awkward miley cyrus GIF

Posted

a hit thread that never dies

:clack:

Posted (edited)
On 2/20/2024 at 3:28 PM, honestopinion said:

Flowers is bigger than entire Ariana career, if Miley didn't spend 10 years with flop RCA where she wasn't even getting radio for masterpieces as midnight sky, she would've achieve more if she left them earlier but i feel like it's just a new beginning for her and she will keep grow and will get more grammys in the future. Critics and general public are loving her now, can't say about the other one. Feels like she used all her potential and keeps making immature songs 

Sure jan, that's why everything after Flowers bombed :lmao:

 

This entire thread is like comparing Cindy Lauper to Madonna.

 

Cindy has 1-2 songs bigger than anything by Madonna, but her catalog and carreer is irrelevant besides those 1-2 songs, just like Miley.

 

Whereas Ariana, like Madonna, has an entire catalog of global smashes, not just 1-2 songs and is far more successful overall.

Edited by slobro
  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Down 4
Posted

people here are gonna be so humbled when Eternal Sunshine is released. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, slobro said:

Sure jan, that's why everything after Flowers bombed :lmao:

 

This entire thread is like comparing Cindy Lauper to Madonna.

 

Cindy has 1-2 songs bigger than anything by Madonna, but her catalog and carreer is irrelevant besides those 1-2 songs, just like Miley.

 

Whereas Ariana, like Madonna, has an entire catalog of global smashes, not just 1-2 songs and is far more successful overall.

:rip:

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, slobro said:

Sure jan, that's why everything after Flowers bombed :lmao:

 

This entire thread is like comparing Cindy Lauper to Madonna.

 

Cindy has 1-2 songs bigger than anything by Madonna, but her catalog and carreer is irrelevant besides those 1-2 songs, just like Miley.

 

Whereas Ariana, like Madonna, has an entire catalog of global smashes, not just 1-2 songs and is far more successful overall

Let's remind you Billboard stats: 

Miley - 30 million albums sold in US.

Homewrecker - 19 million sold in US. :rip:

Miley's biggest album debut - 371k (all pure sales).

Homewrecker's biggest debut - 360k. :rip: 

Miley is 18 years into her career and outselling and outsreaming homewrecker's comeback. :WAP:

Sit down and stay humble 

  • Like 3
Posted
10 hours ago, slobro said:

Sure jan, that's why everything after Flowers bombed :lmao:

 

This entire thread is like comparing Cindy Lauper to Madonna.

 

Cindy has 1-2 songs bigger than anything by Madonna, but her catalog and carreer is irrelevant besides those 1-2 songs, just like Miley.

 

Whereas Ariana, like Madonna, has an entire catalog of global smashes, not just 1-2 songs and is far more successful overall.

Huh? Ariana is nowhere near close to even being uttered in the same breath as Madonna.

 

Meanwhile Miley is the one who scored smashes across a span of three decades  :deadbanana4:

Posted (edited)
On 2/20/2024 at 5:24 PM, tetrachord said:

Because flowers is more palatable, commercial and generic. It could have been sung by anyone and it would still be a hit. Not much artistry here, I fear.


Yes, And? is inherently more risky, esp. with the long intro and the diff sound for Ari - plus its also trying to address a narrative. The song is very her and I don't think anyone but Ari could have pulled it off. It's a testament to her power and the hype of her return that its charting decently esp. with all the home-wrecking allegations.

I feel like we would be having a different conversation if Ariana decided to drop something more obvious like 'Fantasize.'

Ariana’s entire discography could be sung by literally anyone and still be a hit, wdym 💀 

Edited by iammadmat
.
  • Confused 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

How’s Doctor doing? :bird:

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Jjang said:

How’s Doctor doing? :bird:

Better yet, let's ask how Love On is doing.

  • Haha 5
  • Confused 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Jjang said:

How’s Doctor doing? :bird:

We should also take a look at Temporary Summer Layover minus Flowers while we’re at it :gaycat2:

  • Haha 2
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.