Popular Post Mandalore Posted January 27 Popular Post Posted January 27 Just now, QueenBLadyG said: You mean like the little 14 year old girl who killed herself because of her fake AI porn pictures being distributed??? And why would something need to be "viral" to be taken care of? You have to be popular to be helped or shown compassion? You're not arguing in good faith but I'll entertain your silly self it's okay. The tragedy you're talking about didn't occur on X first of all. Something awful went viral on a major social media platform, said platform is now going out of their way to deal with it because it exposes how bad they are at moderating their content. Desperate times, desperate measures. You're pissed THIS mega viral thing about a mega famous woman is the one that generated this loud of conversation on AI regulations and potential new legislations in the near future? Well guess what, if you're truly upset about that 14 year old girl, this is the right step towards those kind of tragedies never happening again or at least not going unpunished by federal law. It's really disheartening to see y'all come at serious subjects like this with stan goggles. 21
QueenBLadyG Posted January 27 Posted January 27 2 minutes ago, Mandalore said: You're not arguing in good faith but I'll entertain your silly self it's okay. The tragedy you're talking about didn't occur on X first of all. Something awful went viral on a major social media platform, said platform is now going out of their way to deal with it because it exposes how bad they are at moderating their content. Desperate times, desperate measures. You're pissed THIS mega viral thing about a mega famous woman is the one that generated this loud of conversation on AI regulations and potential new legislations in the near future? Well guess what, if you're truly upset about that 14 year old girl, this is the right step towards those kind of tragedies never happening again or at least not going unpunished by federal law. It's really disheartening to see y'all come at serious subjects like this with stan goggles. I'm literally a Taylor stan. You look like a mentally ill cult member they like to label some of the Swifties. Everything I said is totally valid. 20
Mandalore Posted January 27 Posted January 27 Just now, QueenBLadyG said: I'm literally a Taylor stan. You look like a mentally ill cult member they like to label some of the Swifties. Everything I said is totally valid. Okay you're just dumb, nevermind. lol 3 5
QueenBLadyG Posted January 27 Posted January 27 Just now, Mandalore said: Okay you're just dumb, nevermind. lol And you're an idiot 6
Illuminati Posted January 27 Posted January 27 (edited) 17 minutes ago, QueenBLadyG said: You mean like the little 14 year old girl who killed herself because of her fake AI porn pictures being distributed??? And why would something need to be "viral" to be taken care of? You have to be popular to be helped or shown compassion? 23 minutes ago, QueenBLadyG said: Just search 'tay' or 'taylor'. And this is doing way too much. She isn't the first person to deal with AI pictures. Where was this outrage before? Did you know that plane hijackings used to be fairly common and no one really cared that much before 9/11? You can learn from it quite a lot about the way the regulations work. You could argue they should have seen it coming and I would agree. It's very rare that strict regulations get implemented BEFORE something bad enough to justify them happens, and Elon pretty much removed everything he saw as unnecessary or "woke" in the Twitter TOS to bring back the banned users. I'm almost certain that the old team would have handled this quicker not just because the team was actively focusing on minimizing online abuse but also because they depended on keeping the advertisers happy. It's not "doing too much," every AI project that generates images has been cracking down on porn for quite a while now. And I don't think the girl's images were ever spread on Twitter, it was on Snapchat and the police DID get involved despite the fact that the girl is not a celebrity. I am almost certain that it will be used as an example to implement laws not just in the UK but also in other countries. Edited January 27 by Illuminati 9
The Music Industry Posted January 27 Author Posted January 27 10 minutes ago, QueenBLadyG said: You mean like the little 14 year old girl who killed herself because of her fake AI porn pictures being distributed??? And why would something need to be "viral" to be taken care of? You have to be popular to be helped or shown compassion? Are just being of bad faith here or...? Like.. Taylor is arguably the most famous person on Earth right now. Of course more people are paying attention to this issue as a result. I'm not quite sure why it's making you angry about it. If she's bringing more awareness to the cause and causing political discussions that might have positive ramifications for AI porn victims, then that's a good thing. It's not a competition about who's the biggest victim, or about how long you've been an activist on a particular issue 9
Badgalbriel Posted January 27 Posted January 27 (edited) 8 minutes ago, QueenBLadyG said: I'm literally a Taylor stan. You look like a mentally ill cult member they like to label some of the Swifties. Everything I said is totally valid. Nothing of what you said is valid. It was all very stupid, tbh. Edited January 27 by Badgalbriel 8
QueenBLadyG Posted January 27 Posted January 27 1 minute ago, Badgalbriel said: Nothing of what you said is valid. It was all very stupid, tbh. I'm so sad
Popular Post Badgalbriel Posted January 27 Popular Post Posted January 27 Just now, QueenBLadyG said: I'm so sad Don't be sad. Be ashamed. 5 11
Machete Posted January 27 Posted January 27 (edited) I do agree with how all of this action being done now that the most famous woman on the planet who happens to be white was affected is problematic. And people need to understand that pointing that fact out is not at all a drag on Taylor or saying what happened to her should be allowed. What happened to her is completely revolting. But action only being taken now after years of people ringing the alarm on the big problems of AI deepfakes just re-enforces the common societal issue that woman/queer/human's rights in general aren't taken seriously until a privileged white person is affected. You can have discussions about how pop girls' treatment is a reflection of society without it being a stan war... Edited January 27 by Machete 1 1
Cruel Summer Posted January 27 Posted January 27 4 minutes ago, ttsmu said: Now ban her music Literally what makes you think this is appropriate given the context of this thread and the situation causing X to take these actions? What about this situation makes you think this is the right thing to post? 8
kyoshi Posted January 27 Posted January 27 25 minutes ago, 40_L3VE said: I can still search for "Taylor Swift", but I cannot search Taylor Swift. This "ban" doesn't really do anything. Also if you type it incomplete like swifelon and his team are so stupid my god i bet they half-assed this just to be able to say they "tried" and wash their hands
QueenBLadyG Posted January 27 Posted January 27 (edited) 7 minutes ago, The Music Industry said: Are just being of bad faith here or...? Like.. Taylor is arguably the most famous person on Earth right now. Of course more people are paying attention to this issue as a result. I'm not quite sure why it's making you angry about it. If she's bringing more awareness to the cause and causing political discussions that might have positive ramifications for AI porn victims, then that's a good thing. It's not a competition about who's the biggest victim, or about how long you've been an activist on a particular issue Angry? I'm being honest and wondering why it takes Taylor for everyone to all of a sudden understand how important regulating AI deepfakes and it's a problem? No one said anything about a competition. This should've been taken care of when it started being a problem to begin with. There's nothing wrong with me pointing that out. I wasn't asked to bring an X/Twitter example to the table. The 14 year old girl was a viral story. Leave the stan hats at the door. It's pathetic. Edited January 27 by QueenBLadyG 2
Badgalbriel Posted January 27 Posted January 27 4 minutes ago, QueenBLadyG said: Angry? I'm being honest and wondering why it takes Taylor for everyone to all of a sudden understand how important regulating AI deepfakes and it's a problem? No one said anything about a competition. This should've been taken care of when it started being a problem to begin with. There's nothing wrong with me pointing that out. I wasn't asked to bring an X/Twitter example to the table. The 14 year old girl was a viral story. Leave the stan hats at the door. It's pathetic. The 14 yo girl case didn't happen on Twitter so what relevance does Twitter banning a term has to do with that?
QueenBLadyG Posted January 27 Posted January 27 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Badgalbriel said: The 14 yo girl case didn't happen on Twitter so what relevance does Twitter banning a term has to do with that? It went viral on Twitter. That's where I saw it. Edited January 27 by QueenBLadyG
Badgalbriel Posted January 27 Posted January 27 Just now, QueenBLadyG said: I know you can, but, can you read? I wasn't asked to talk about anything Twitter related. They asked for something "viral". And yet, you're talking about how it needs someone like Taylor Swift for TWITTER to take action and then you come with a story where TWITTER would have absolutely no power on.
kyoshi Posted January 27 Posted January 27 5 minutes ago, QueenBLadyG said: Angry? I'm being honest and wondering why it takes Taylor for everyone to all of a sudden understand how important regulating AI deepfakes and it's a problem? No one said anything about a competition. This should've been taken care of when it started being a problem to begin with. There's nothing wrong with me pointing that out. I wasn't asked to bring an X/Twitter example to the table. The 14 year old girl was a viral story. Leave the stan hats at the door. It's pathetic. You say this as if it was taylor who asked to become the scapegoat for this AI regulation campaign and to have images of her naked body being gang r*ped to be discussed by the public and international news... 3
QueenBLadyG Posted January 27 Posted January 27 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Badgalbriel said: And yet, you're talking about how it needs someone like Taylor Swift for TWITTER to take action and then you come with a story where TWITTER would have absolutely no power on. I literally was speaking in general terms in my first comment. I said AI deepfakes. Which shouldn't have been an issue for anyone. Edited January 27 by QueenBLadyG
Cruel Summer Posted January 27 Posted January 27 11 minutes ago, QueenBLadyG said: Angry? I'm being honest and wondering why it takes Taylor for everyone to all of a sudden understand how important regulating AI deepfakes and it's a problem? No one said anything about a competition. This should've been taken care of when it started being a problem to begin with. There's nothing wrong with me pointing that out. I wasn't asked to bring an X/Twitter example to the table. The 14 year old girl was a viral story. Leave the stan hats at the door. It's pathetic. You started your side of the conversation in this thread by suggesting that the current search limits were “doing way too much” and saying she wasn’t the first person to deal with this, then asking where this outrage was before. That probably doesn’t read to everyone as genuine concern about prior non-celebrity victims not having been taken seriously enough, but instead might come across as dismissing the current situation, as if to imply that she should just get over it, or that these measures shouldn’t be tried, or that people in general are overreacting - just because it’s happened to others before who weren’t given this same attention. Not saying that’s how I read it or how you actually meant it, but I think that’s why people reacted the way they did to you. Everyone who has a moral opposition to this kind of material being distributed probably agrees with you that attention to this kind of situation is long overdue and that it shouldn’t have taken one of the biggest celebrities in the world being a target for serious conversations to be had about it. 6 2
Illuminati Posted January 27 Posted January 27 2 minutes ago, QueenBLadyG said: It went viral on Twitter. That's where I saw it. But they weren't posting child porn on Twitter, like ??? what's not clicking Or did you want Elon to block people from finding out about the harms of AI porn? Just now, Badgalbriel said: The 14 yo girl case didn't happen on Twitter so what relevance does Twitter banning a term has to do with that? Exactly but since they brought this up, she was also not from the US, and the US companies (and the country in general) are notoriously slow at implementing any regulations. I've seen people get mad about the EU regulations because of how draconian they are or because they "unfairly target" the US companies because of all the **** they get away with. But off the top of my head, all aspects of the GDPR, such as right to be forgotten and the data privacy laws that resulted in Facebook being fined have largely been beneficial to everyone. And I would STILL say that's just the bare minimum of what can be done. It also took massive privacy related leaks for someone to finally look into it.
QueenBLadyG Posted January 27 Posted January 27 5 minutes ago, kyoshi said: You say this as if it was taylor who asked to become the scapegoat for this AI regulation campaign and to have images of her naked body being gang r*ped to be discussed by the public and international news... No, I'm saying it because it's odd that it takes something like this to occur with Taylor and suddenly ALL these parties are coming out with opinions and calls for regulations, even the White House, when this should've been regulated to the point they want it to be now. I would've said the same thing if it was Beyoncé. She wouldn't have been the first.
playboi Posted January 27 Posted January 27 it gives the illusion of a world where there is no "Taylor Swift"... how peaceful
QueenBLadyG Posted January 27 Posted January 27 1 minute ago, Illuminati said: But they weren't posting child porn on Twitter, like ??? what's not clicking Or did you want Elon to block people from finding out about the harms of AI porn? Exactly but since they brought this up, she was also not from the US, and the US companies (and the country in general) are notoriously slow at implementing any regulations. I've seen people get mad about the EU regulations because of how draconian they are or because they "unfairly target" the US companies because of all the **** they get away with. But off the top of my head, all aspects of the GDPR, such as right to be forgotten and the data privacy laws that resulted in Facebook being fined have largely been beneficial to everyone. And I would STILL say that's just the bare minimum of what can be done. It also took massive privacy related leaks for someone to finally look into it. They do post a lot of child porn to Twitter, unfortunately but, I was simply bringing up a viral story I had read before this happened on Twitter. I wasn't stating my opinion on this as an only Twitter thing. I was talking in general.
kyoshi Posted January 27 Posted January 27 6 minutes ago, QueenBLadyG said: No, I'm saying it because it's odd that it takes something like this to occur with Taylor and suddenly ALL these parties are coming out with opinions and calls for regulations, even the White House, when this should've been regulated to the point they want it to be now. I would've said the same thing if it was Beyoncé. She wouldn't have been the first. I believe you would say this about any victim, becase you really dgaf about them and the white house also has no plans to do anything about the ai images btw they’re just using it for some brownie points and to get people to vote for genocide joe 3 1
Recommended Posts