AxelFox Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 8 minutes ago, WildHeart said: Both 1989 and Red were top 20 (#15 and #16) in the Metacritic decade end aggregate list. In the list you checked, Red is #31. I didn't know Metacritic did decade end lists? If so I'd like a link and see the methodology used. As for the actual aggregated list, to claim Taylor's swift albums 'stomped' on albums with scores in the 90s is simply false. It's very obvious the high scores she's getting nowadays are more related to the narrative around her rather than the quality of the music itself.
AxelFox Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 11 minutes ago, Miss Americana said: Metacritic made their own decade end list and both RED and 1989 made the top 20. https://web.archive.org/web/20230209093431/https://www.metacritic.com/feature/best-albums-of-the-decade-2010s And this was during the panned Loser era before she built all the critic's goodwill. Thanks. So still below a plethora of albums with 90+ scores.
WildHeart Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 12 minutes ago, AxelFox said: As for the actual aggregated list, to claim Taylor's swift albums 'stomped' on albums with scores in the 90s is simply false. 8 minutes ago, AxelFox said: So still below a plethora of albums with 90+ scores. +90 albums Above 1989 and Red - 6 Below 1989 and Red - 14 So 1989 and Red both stomped majority of albums with +90 score as @Miss Americanaclaimed 15 minutes ago, AxelFox said: It's very obvious the high scores she's getting nowadays are more related to the narrative around her rather than the quality of the music itself. That doesn't make sense when 1989 and Red both ended up very high on decade end lists last decade. Does your claim have any argument to it or is it just how you feel? 2 1
Richie.Valdez Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 The Scooter’s version of 1989 is superior. TV is like a karaoke version 1
Redstreak Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 2 hours ago, Draper. said: He’s right. Taylor’s rerecordings are cheap cash grabs except for Fearless and the Red Vault. Red is unnecessary, the poppier cuts sound awful. Speak Now kills the teen joy from the OG. And 1989 TV sounds flat compared to the original productions. The Vault tracks sound nothing like the actual album either. Tell us more scooter Braun 4 1
Kimi Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 and hes right? its kinda funny to see so many people lying to themselves that they like TV more than OG 2 1
AxelFox Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 10 minutes ago, WildHeart said: +90 albums Above 1989 and Red - 6 Below 1989 and Red - 14 So 1989 and Red both stomped majority of albums with +90 score as @Miss Americanaclaimed That doesn't make sense when 1989 and Red both ended up very high on decade end lists last decade. Does your claim have any argument to it or is it just how you feel? Well they didn't end up 'very high' on decade end lists. That Metacritic list gives the same amount of points regardless of placement, with only a 0.5 difference between a top10 and top20 position. Hence why she fared a lot worse on AOTY who has a more elaborate grading system to differentiate albums that actually rank 'high'. That is my argument. But if a deleted & archived list makes you feel better about your claim instead of a published & available one then by all means proceed with your delusions.
Wolf Alice Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 34 minutes ago, AxelFox said: plethora Might wanna look up what that word means
BryceG Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 Dear OP: You can't come for Taylor over commercials... You can't come for Taylor over mainstream critics... You can't come for Taylor over the general public reception... Why did you think this would work? It makes you look cheap and deluded. 3
LoveInStereo Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 44 minutes ago, Price of Fame said: fantano is an actual critic, ajay is just a random who couldn't speak critically on music if her life depended on it And the distinction means what? She’s a listener & he’s a failed musician? Her opinions are more in line with how a well adjusted person hears music. Everything he hears is experienced through a bias of jaded bitterness. She just enjoys music. The only pop stars he purports to enjoy are ones he sees as underdogs. It wasn't until poptimism was widespread he even pretended to like artists of the genre. I wish he’d be real & just admit he doesn’t enjoy pop, only heady, pretentious bs that tries to be edgy & deep 3
LoveInStereo Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 (edited) 22 minutes ago, Kimi said: and hes right? its kinda funny to see so many people lying to themselves that they like TV more than OG 1989 was slammed at the time by techies for lacking dynamics, over-compression & being mixed too loud. Now it’s been tweaked to fix that prob & people are claiming the originals were perfect? Ppl hating on the TVs are mostly just being contrarian pick me’s. Dude didn’t even like the original album! Edited December 17, 2023 by LoveInStereo 2
WildHeart Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 (edited) 35 minutes ago, AxelFox said: Well they didn't end up 'very high' on decade end lists. That Metacritic list gives the same amount of points regardless of placement, with only a 0.5 difference between a top10 and top20 position. Hence why she fared a lot worse on AOTY who has a more elaborate grading system to differentiate albums that actually rank 'high'. That is my argument. But if a deleted & archived list makes you feel better about your claim instead of a published & available one then by all means proceed with your delusions. Talking about delusions while believing that 25th and 31st most acclaimed albums of a decade would make anyone upset like they are not very acclaimed (if they are not, you fave has only one very acclaimed album in her whole career) is hilarious. Both 1989 and Red being mid-70s albums but ending up top 20 or 30 (depending on the list you use) most acclaimed albums of a decade shows that they were very acclaimed retrospectively which explains the acclaim they get today. But if her scores being high because of narrative instead of music is the argument that makes you feel better, go ahead... Edited December 17, 2023 by WildHeart 2
teenager Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 (edited) I love Taylor’s attitude to re-recording and reclaiming her hard work but 1989 TV was a definite miss - it’s giving own brand supermarket goods Edited December 17, 2023 by teenager
lonnie Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 Quite frankly the only reason it got the score it has is because Taylor is humongous, critics are giving high scores overall, and the era being what it is. It doesn't deserve the praise it got but I don't get why people pay much attention to YT critics. But he is right here I guess 1 1
Cleanromantic Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 He also didn't like the original and called it overrated as well so the oth that suddenly like the OG and warship this YouTuber need another narrative I fear.
ATRL Moderator MissedTheTrain Posted December 17, 2023 ATRL Moderator Posted December 17, 2023 His opinion! Re-creating 1989 was always going to be a challenge and there were a couple of songs that did not turn out quite as good as the originals (Style, mainly), but they're close enough for fulfilling the purpose for Taylor. There are quite a few that I feel like are better than the originals...I Know Places, You Are In Love, Wonderland, This Love, just to name a few. 1
Noodles Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 4 hours ago, hyde said: I'd trust Ajayll's word more than this man That woman offers NOTHING other than screaming, crying or being shady, which obviously is what a lot of people love to watch. But there's nothing to "trust" when it comes to her reactions, she offers nothing.
McNulty Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 he's right the 1989 TV mixing is terrible, you guys need your ears checked
Redstreak Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 1 hour ago, LoveInStereo said: 1989 was slammed at the time by techies for lacking dynamics, over-compression & being mixed too loud. Now it’s been tweaked to fix that prob & people are claiming the originals were perfect? Ppl hating on the TVs are mostly just being contrarian pick me’s. Dude didn’t even like the original album! He literally didn’t even bother reviewing the original 1
Diet Pepsi Posted December 17, 2023 Posted December 17, 2023 I’m sure she’s whipping her tears with her millions of dollar bills 1
Recommended Posts