Jump to content

Pitchfork - 1989TV 7.7


Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, they’re off as always, and their assessment of ****! is boringly off the mark, but it’s a cute enough score for them so I’ll stop complaining.

  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

Same as the original :clap3:

  • Like 1
Posted

it's not bad

Posted
5 minutes ago, Cain said:

Deserves a worse score than the original for its worse production and vocals takes so this was v generous of them 

Well according to them it’s the most faithful of the TVs so far 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

This deserves nothing higher than a 6.5. The production ruins it

 

Blank Space & How You Get The Girl sound awful instrumentally. 

Edited by NEUTRON
  • Like 10
  • Thanks 2
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

This is a more accurate review than most have been giving it, but the original deserved higher. The hollow productions take so much away from it.

  • Like 6
Posted

Giving this ******* heap of rotting garbage a higher score than Sampha's new album is literally an international disgrace

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 2
  • Thumbs Down 6
Posted

great :clap3: the sound engineers on Atrl lost

 

4 minutes ago, uusagii said:

Giving this ******* heap of rotting garbage a higher score than Sampha's new album is literally an international disgrace

Please stop being miserable.

 

I literally played Lahai like 20 times (yet 1989 TV like....3 times) and meanwhile it got a 7.0 is a travesty, it got nothing to do with this album. 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted

Too high. Also seems like they're just rating the vault tracks not the actual re-recordings.

  • Like 5
Posted

Taylor Swift's trickling monopoly over the industry is straight up the worst thing to have happened to modern music

  • Like 12
  • Confused 3
  • ATRL Moderator
Posted

Decent score :clap3: 

Posted

Well, they’re off as always, and their assessment of ****! is boringly off the mark, but it’s a cute enough score for them so I’ll stop complaining. 5.7/10 would’ve been more accurate 

  • Like 6
  • Thumbs Down 1
Posted

Better than it deserves, but at least they're somewhat honest unlike those other critics that don't even bother actualing critiquing and just give a 100 because it's by Taylor Swift and nothing more. :giraffe:

  • Like 2
Posted
7 minutes ago, Blue Rose said:

Well, they’re off as always, and their assessment of ****! is boringly off the mark, but it’s a cute enough score for them so I’ll stop complaining. 5.7/10 would’ve been more accurate 

The OTH is scrumbling again. Stream your faves albums first than getting your feels and vibes

  • Confused 3
Posted

Vault tracks might deserve 8.0 but the rest of album is not worthy anything more than 6.0.

Posted

Once again, I’ve never put much stock into Pitchfork, but it’s fine. Love to see the OTHs running into this thread, though. :clap3:

Posted

-1 point would be fine.

Posted

A 7.7 is good idk why people think otherwise

Posted

Out of touch motherfuckers! 

Posted
3 hours ago, uusagii said:

Giving this ******* heap of rotting garbage a higher score than Sampha's new album is literally an international disgrace

they did what now 

 

sunbathinganimal

Posted
4 hours ago, uusagii said:

Giving this ******* heap of rotting garbage a higher score than Sampha's new album is literally an international disgrace

Where is the correlation? :confused:  

Posted

deserved 6.5-6.8 at best for its karaoke production and downgraded vocals. Clean is the only song that has gotten better somehow.

  • Like 1
Posted

Should be higher for the best TV yet. Their score for Speak Now, the weakest one yet, was a little too high. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.