Mornings Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 Who cares we don’t want more tour coverage.. we want the visuals
jadeabove Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 Not Beyoncé being a Final Fantasy VII stan. 3 4
aaron511 Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 I'd prefer to have the visuals first over the tour movie but I'll be seated anyway
State of Grace. Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 It's coming to theaters WW apparently and titled Rebirth
Michael196 Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 when she surprise drops act 2 on the same day, a few days before self titled 10 year anniversary
TaylorNation Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 I hope we get the full tour and not just truncated performances spread with random footage 1
bijonse Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 8 hours ago, mypaintoyou said: Literally Beyoncé comes second everything Taylor is doing somehow Beyoncé is attached too it’s annoying but I mean it’s a smart business move to copy steps from the biggest artist in the world I just hope the Beyoncé fans come out and show up at the movies like the swifties are for miss swift they also wanted to include Beyoncé to Barbie and Taylor it’s like enough Swifties trying to rewrite history. Taylor has always done what Beyoncé (and other artists) have done first. Beyoncé did a concert film in theaters for limited release years ago 1
bijonse Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 “Beyoncé copied the contracts” if amc offered her the same deal they offered taylor when she wanted to do a theatrical release of her videos/concert/whatever film is coming, was she supposed to say “no, that’s too similar to what you gave taylor swift. I want less money!” 2
liam13 Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 5 minutes ago, bijonse said: “Beyoncé copied the contracts” if amc offered her the same deal they offered taylor when she wanted to do a theatrical release of her videos/concert/whatever film is coming, was she supposed to say “no, that’s too similar to what you gave taylor swift. I want less money!” given that studios and streaming services rejected her film, i dont think she has better deal than this 3 1
BnPac Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 Even if it wasn’t AMC, they would still be all over the thread. Even when Beyoncé simply report her tour gross like every artist has done before, it was related to their fave because she didn’t do it. So it’s whatever.
bijonse Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 1 minute ago, liam13 said: given that studios and streaming services rejected her film, i dont think she has better deal than this Yes because you were in those rooms with her and her team. Tell me more we’re all dying to hear about it
Feanor Posted October 1, 2023 Author Posted October 1, 2023 5 minutes ago, bijonse said: “Beyoncé copied the contracts” if amc offered her the same deal they offered taylor when she wanted to do a theatrical release of her videos/concert/whatever film is coming, was she supposed to say “no, that’s too similar to what you gave taylor swift. I want less money!” Except AMC didn't offer Taylor a deal. Taylor's team went directly to AMC with their idea to skip studios altogether and let AMC distribute the film. This is not something AMC came up with. Beyoncé releasing her visuals/tour this way is only possible because Taylor paved the way for this release strategy to happen in the first place 3 3
airplane Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 41 minutes ago, AxelFox said: Most likely just the interludes she filmed specifically for the tour. Like this one for example I doubt this is part of the music video/film she did for the album itself Ahhh. I’m seated anyway. I wish i could experience the tour again but this will do
Mr. Specialist Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 (edited) 25 minutes ago, Michael196 said: when she surprise drops act 2 on the same day, a few days before self titled 10 year anniversary A surprise release or pre-orders for Act II starting on December 1st would be great. 20 minutes ago, TaylorNation said: I hope we get the full tour and not just truncated performances spread with random footage IMO, I highly doubt the full tour is included since the film is under 3 hours. Also, unlike Homecoming, the bio of the film says “documentary” instead of “concert film”. I think the style of the film will be a mixture of both Life Is But A Dream & Homecoming. Edited October 1, 2023 by Mr. Specialist
Shelter Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 4 minutes ago, liam13 said: given that studios and streaming services rejected her film, i dont think she has better deal than this Someone else couldn’t get a good deal so had to go with AMC, or are you forgetting that. they didn’t want to pay her.
Frappucino Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 I've honestly been wanting to catch a flight so I can relive the show again so this is great news for me and my wallet
FolkLover1989 Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 4 minutes ago, Feanor said: Except AMC didn't offer Taylor a deal. Taylor's team went directly to AMC with their idea to skip studios altogether and let AMC distribute the film. This is not something AMC came up with. Beyoncé releasing her visuals/tour this way is only possible because Taylor paved the way for this release strategy to happen in the first place Yup this is not AMC deal This was the idea of Taylor, her team and her parents which AMC agreed to and now Beyoncé copied. if this was AMC thing it would be very different. Taylor and her team crafted this idea lol
FolkLover1989 Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 2 minutes ago, Shelter said: Someone else couldn’t get a good deal so had to go with AMC, or are you forgetting that. they didn’t want to pay her. They didn't want to pay her this way cause Taylor wanted to release using different strategy of making movie available only on weekends and on the price which Taylor wanted. They wanted to release on streaming etc.. So this idea got accepted by AMC and now that same idea Bey is copying AMC didn't come up with this. She and her parents did.
liam13 Posted October 1, 2023 Posted October 1, 2023 1 minute ago, Shelter said: Someone else couldn’t get a good deal so had to go with AMC, or are you forgetting that. they didn’t want to pay her. no, they wanted to send it to theaters in 2024, which taylor and family didnt like. meaning they wanted it but the deals were sh*t she contacted AMC CEO directly. meanwhile, no studios and streaming services wanted beyonces film despite it was done in November 2022 1
Feanor Posted October 1, 2023 Author Posted October 1, 2023 1 minute ago, Shelter said: Someone else couldn’t get a good deal so had to go with AMC, or are you forgetting that. they didn’t want to pay her. Except this is not true judging from the reports we have. Multiple traditional Hollywood studios were interested in distributing The Eras Tour, as Puck News reported: Quote Sure, doing a deal with Swift might anger AMC’s Hollywood partners, especially since those studios were also interested in the project. […] For that reason, Universal is understandably extra-pissed. Its biggest customer swooped in and took a movie it had been talking about distributing Taylor went with AMC because the studios wanted to release the concert film in 2025, not because they didn't want to pay her. 4
Recommended Posts