album Taylor Swift - '1989 (Taylor's Version)'

[Buffy]

So, the limited variants is clearly a lie. Each back cover of the variants spell out a number from 1989. So you can’t complete the year without having a complete set similar to the Midnights clock.  They need to stop with the gimmicky limited edition claim.

Edited September 20, 2023 by Buffy

[Timeless]

31 minutes ago, Buffy said:

So, the limited variants is clearly a lie. Each back cover of the variants spell out a number from 1989. So you can’t complete the year without having a complete set similar to the Midnights clock.  They need to stop with the gimmicky limited edition claim.

To be fair they never used the words "limited edition" in any of their marketing.

[TMRA]

1 hour ago, BeenTheShit said:

I don't get how she can censor "Better Than Revenge" and then release a track called "****!" 

I feel like SL*T is gonna be something satirical like The Man, in a way how a woman who dates is a sl*t but a guy is cool and a player. While the mattress line is basically sl*t shaming so I understand why she changed that one ( not that I approve it BTR is iconic)

[Michael196]

someone edit the weight with **** too 

 

[Holiest Dreams]

We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together
Shake It Off
Blank Space
Bad Blood
Look What You Made Me Do
Cardigan
Willow
All Too Well
Anti-Hero
"****!"
 

[réveuse]

WAIT IT WAS SLVT?

[Timeless]

12 minutes ago, Holiest Dreams said:

We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together
Shake It Off
Blank Space
Bad Blood
Look What You Made Me Do
Cardigan
Willow
All Too Well
Anti-Hero
"****!"
 

We will make it number 1 whether or not it's pushed as a single 

[YellowRibbon]

8 minutes ago, réveuse said:

WAIT IT WAS SLVT?

YES 

[Enrique523]

Yeah, US fans really need to get this to chart as high as possible. To see it at #1 would be a kii 

[Holiest Dreams]

2 hours ago, Feanor said:

Those are probably next on the list after the 48h vinyl sale ends.

And then possibly signed CDs & vinyl + the reveal of the Target exclusive track as the final sales push.

 

She's really aiming for that 1M opening.

Did you mean 2M? Because it's already at 850K physical pre-sales. Even without counting the digital sales, and if it didn't sell even one more pure copy, it would open not far off from the original first week when you include the streams it'll get. 
 

The question now is if she can hit 2M, because it's locked to outdo the OG and probably Midnights too. 

[Holiest Dreams]

10 minutes ago, Timeless said:

We will make it number 1 whether or not it's pushed as a single 

Imagine how monstrous the streams will be nnn

[Enrique523]

1 hour ago, Holiest Dreams said:

Did you mean 2M? Because it's already at 850K physical pre-sales. Even without counting the digital sales, and if it didn't sell even one more pure copy, it would open not far off from the original first week when you include the streams it'll get. 
 

The question now is if she can hit 2M, because it's locked to outdo the OG and probably Midnights too. 

I don't know if she'll reach 2M with 1989 TV but she'll reach it for sure with TS11. Her first whole new album post-Midnights/Eras Tour? Oh yeah she's getting that 2M at that point, 100%.

[Enrique523]

1 hour ago, Holiest Dreams said:

Imagine how monstrous the streams will be nnn

I mean, a Taylor Swift song called Sl*t? Between the fans, the GP AND haters listening out of curiosity, the numbers will absolutely be explosive. I could see it doing 20M+ streams first day.

Edited September 20, 2023 by Enrique523

[Cruel Summer]

17 minutes ago, Holiest Dreams said:

Did you mean 2M? Because it's already at 850K physical pre-sales. Even without counting the digital sales, and if it didn't sell even one more pure copy, it would open not far off from the original first week when you include the streams it'll get. 
 

The question now is if she can hit 2M, because it's locked to outdo the OG and probably Midnights too. 

I can’t get over the fact that we can make posts like this after how I thought she was on a natural, perfectly reasonable decline when Lover “only” did like 867k.

 

And now she’s going to do more than that in preorders 

[Goddxss]

**** has lyrics that can cut glass.

[Goddxss]

Also where's the Tangerine exclusive track?

[Holiest Dreams]

16 minutes ago, Enrique523 said:

I don't know if she'll reach 2M with 1989 TV but she'll reach it for sure with TS11. Her first whole new album post-Midnights/Eras Tour? Oh yeah she's getting that 2M at that point, 100%.

Yeah I think she'd need signed CDs to pull 2M and I'd rather, if she has any, save them back so we don't get an SOS vs Midnights repeat with the rumored Nov-Dec Bad Bunny album. But I guess anything's possible. I think it can get to 1.6-1.8M for sure.

 

15 minutes ago, Enrique523 said:

I mean, a Taylor Swift song called Sl*t? Between the fans, the GP AND haters listening out of curiosity, the numbers will absolutely be explosive. I could see it doing 20M+ streams first day.

It'll probably do more than AH/LH etc for sure  

[Holiest Dreams]

7 minutes ago, Cruel Summer said:

I can’t get over the fact that we can make posts like this after how I thought she was on a natural, perfectly reasonable decline when Lover “only” did like 867k.

 

And now she’s going to do more than that in preorders 

And now if she opened with 867K with TS11 (not happening) it would be deemed a massive flop  

 

Oh, Taylor

[Pop_Data]

I always sense she wanted the 1989 TV to be without features so the Nicki alleged feature was a ridiculous theory from the fans.

 

However, It does look unethical that she is not including the Kendrick Lamar version of Bad Blood into the track list of the TV when his version is the one that gave her another #1 and a Grammy award. Bad Blood remix played a big role in the 1989 era and it would be shameful if it got belittled to being a limited edition Target bonus track.  

 

It should at least get a stand-alone version released. Do we agree? 

[1989]

I think Sl*t has a real possibility at #1. Might be just a fan-driven-quick-one-week-then-free-fall #1 a la ATW10, but the possibility is there.

 

And that’s only if she doesn’t push it as a single. Imagine if she does. 

[Cruel Summer]

6 minutes ago, 1989 said:

I think Sl*t has a real possibility at #1. Might be just a fan-driven-quick-one-week-then-free-fall #1 a la ATW10, but the possibility is there.

 

And that’s only if she doesn’t push it as a single. Imagine if she does. 

If I Can See You got a video, “****!” can too! 

[popstyle]

8 minutes ago, Pop_Data said:

I always sense she wanted the 1989 TV to be without features so the Nicki alleged feature was a ridiculous theory from the fans.

 

However, It does look unethical that she is not including the Kendrick Lamar version of Bad Blood into the track list of the TV when his version is the one that gave her another #1 and a Grammy award. Bad Blood remix played a big role in the 1989 era and it would be shameful if it got belittled to being a limited edition Target bonus track.  

 

It should at least get a stand-alone version released. Do we agree? 

maybe she's hiding all the features for now

[1989]

Just now, Cruel Summer said:

If I Can See You got a video, “****!” can too! 

Ugh, we moved on from I Can See You too quickly, but that’s another conversation. 
 

We deserve the Sl*t video! 

[P!NK2LOVE]

“ S L U T ! “

  

 

Never in a million YEARS did I think she’d have a song titled THAT

[wsurferwayne]

fingers crossed slvt! to be synth-rock smash hit!!!! expected to somewhat sound like kiss it better

Hope it is not another me!ss 2.0!!!!
Suburban legends could be the cruel summer of 1989 TV!!!!!

Edited September 21, 2023 by wsurferwayne