John Slayne Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 the way ATRLers were claiming Margot is box office poison after Babylon... I told y'all Barbie was coming!!
WildAmerican Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 i feel like i'm betraying the gheys bc i liked Oppenheimer more 1
loliza Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 On 7/23/2023 at 5:39 PM, Saintlor said: According to Deadline, Indiana Jones' marketing was over 100M Not really a stretch to say Barbie's marketing cost 2-3x more than Indiana Jones Expand And what gives you this idea? I mean barbie was more talked but because it's more a topic for online people, who the **** cares about Indiana in 2023? It's obvious that you have to spend more to market it and not get the same result. We live in a barbie world
publikcitizen Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 Oh yikes, MI fell hard this weekend. Hopefully it will leg out for the rest of the summer.
sweetblindness Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 On 7/23/2023 at 6:14 PM, publikcitizen said: Oh yikes, MI fell hard this weekend. Hopefully it will leg out for the rest of the summer. Expand Not sure what they were thinking with that release date. The franchise is usually pretty successful so I'm not too worried about Part 2, but it should've released in December.
iknowplaces Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 (edited) Ava's Barbie But tbh I'm not surprised since I haven't seen this much promo for a movie in a long time. I mean, when you google Barbie, the whole search page has a custom style. Crazy. Edited July 23, 2023 by iknowplaces
Broken Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 On 7/23/2023 at 4:37 PM, Jaded. said: GP said YES to original movies and NO to tired ass sequels, reboots and remakes this summer. Thank god. Expand Summer movies Guardians 3 and Spider-Verse 2 are two of the biggest movies of the year . The GP said NO to non-superhero movies . 1
Enrique523 Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 On 7/23/2023 at 4:37 PM, WERKER said: Babes Dua has like 40 seconds screen time, is so forgettable and is very wooden coming for a razzie whilst Margot is coming for an Oscar Expand His simple comment really triggered you THAT much?
Raspberries Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 I know the chromatican citizens are mad that Margot is stomping commercially and critically 3
Welovetrouble Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 On 7/23/2023 at 5:39 PM, Saintlor said: According to Deadline, Indiana Jones' marketing was over 100M Not really a stretch to say Barbie's marketing cost 2-3x more than Indiana Jones Expand Lmao bffr there's no way the marketing cost more than 100 million
bjorn Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 On 7/23/2023 at 5:31 PM, MrLovett said: Expand I mean guess the only real significant one is biggest opening for a female director. The rest are just reaching lol
Enrique523 Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 On 7/23/2023 at 5:39 PM, Saintlor said: According to Deadline, Indiana Jones' marketing was over 100M Not really a stretch to say Barbie's marketing cost 2-3x more than Indiana Jones Expand You can't be serious On 7/23/2023 at 6:06 PM, John Slayne said: the way ATRLers were claiming Margot is box office poison after Babylon... I told y'all Barbie was coming!! Expand There's no such thing as "box office poison" for any actor whatsoever. The reason why some of her previous films flopped was because of the movies themselves, not Margot. Literally NO ONE in the GP is thinking "omg i absolutely hate that actor, i won't watch any of their movies ever, even if the film looks great". All it took was a movie that looked interesting with great marketing and there you go, another box office hit for Margot.
Lovett Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 On 7/23/2023 at 6:34 PM, bjorn said: I mean guess the only real significant one is biggest opening for a female director. The rest are just reaching lol Expand They're still records. 4 1
Broken Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 On 7/23/2023 at 6:19 PM, sweetblindness said: Not sure what they were thinking with that release date. The franchise is usually pretty successful so I'm not too worried about Part 2, but it should've released in December. Expand Or August.
Eternium Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 On 7/23/2023 at 4:40 PM, KatyPrismSpirit said: Does that budget include marketing cost? Expand No. The production cost is $145M. There’s a rumor that the marketing budget was $100M, but it’s probably closer to $145M. Altogether, the film should cost around $300M, but we won’t get an official report until Deadline does their list of the most profitable films next summer. On 7/23/2023 at 4:44 PM, Paola Bracho said: I came here to ask this. Feels like the promo for this movie costs more than the actual movie. Expand The promo just resonated really well. They didn’t spend much more on this film’s marketing than an average blockbuster. On 7/23/2023 at 4:47 PM, KatyPrismSpirit said: i think it doesn't. Read an article the movie won't break even until it grosses over $300M. (which is gonna happen easily). The movie itself wasn't as expensive as other's because of the lack of CGI and using more traditional decors (which apparently, are way less expensive). Expand That’s not how movies work, sis. Theaters are businesses, too. Studios make 50% of the gross from domestic, 40% from worldwide and 30% from China. Unless they have different deals (like Disney, who takes a greater percentage from theaters. On 7/23/2023 at 5:11 PM, Totami Legend said: the movie already doubled the budget so they got back even the marketing costs, it's going to be profitable from now on Expand $155M x 0.5 = $77.5M $182M x 0.4 = $72.8M The studio made $151.3M in the opening weekend. They’ll need to basically double these numbers to hit a profit. Keep in mind the film will do that in two more weekends and then it will have two months of its run where it just brings in profit. They’ll also get royalties from the soundtrack, DVD sales, video-on-demand sales and streaming rights sales. I’d be shocked if the movie makes anything less than a profit of $400M at this rate. On 7/23/2023 at 5:29 PM, BOOMBAYAH said: This. I think people are overestimating marketing costs, there’s no way marketing was over 100 - 150M for this Expand Marketing is usually the same cost as the production budget. This movie has had a huge, A-tier marketing budget, so there’s no chance they spent less than $100M on it.
OrgVisual Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 Atrl said Margot is box office poison jut a few months ago
Aethereal Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 On 7/23/2023 at 5:58 PM, Broken said: RIP Mission: Impossible. It's gonna lose money. Tom is probably fuming rn. Expand It had so many things going against it. Covid-Inflated budget, China's market shift from the Western products which was huge for this franchise, competition from Barbie/Oppenheimer and the strike.
favorite crime Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 On 7/23/2023 at 5:39 PM, Saintlor said: According to Deadline, Indiana Jones' marketing was over 100M Not really a stretch to say Barbie's marketing cost 2-3x more than Indiana Jones Expand It is delusion. Barbie's marketing budget will be the same as any film with the same production budget. All the promo people are talking about is not expensive. All the brand deals probably cost next to nothing since it's mutually profitable. Viral tweets cost nothing. The cast did the same amount of interviews as any cast of a blockbuster does. Expensive is running trailers and ads and putting up posters and I doubt you'll find any numbers proving Barbie had substantially more of that than other films 1
Kylizzle Posted July 23, 2023 Posted July 23, 2023 Oppenheimer really did that It's impressive especially for a movie with almost no action scenes and almost all talking. 5
Recommended Posts