bjorn Posted March 26 Posted March 26 11 minutes ago, Lightbringer007 said: and movies arent the only thing actors can do theres tv shows, sitcoms, broadway shows, etc ... Yeah but you're speaking as of you know her wishes or her best interest. She is 23 year old new upcoming actor. Only been in a few movies. Like cmon now
Lightbringer007 Posted March 26 Posted March 26 2 minutes ago, bjorn said: Yeah but you're speaking as of you know her wishes or her best interest. She is 23 year old new upcoming actor. Only been in a few movies. Like cmon now and yet the directors are the ones who are fighting a young actress cause they didnt expect their own movie to flop, now cmon 1
AdrianTrav Posted March 26 Posted March 26 Hmm...Rachel is really Box Office poison. West Side Story, Shazam, Y2K and now Snow White... Thats like 4 out of 5 movies in her filmography. 2
Gorjesspazze9 Posted March 27 Posted March 27 (edited) Theaters in general really are on the decline, unless it's a blockbuster event movie. I walked into my local theater last weekend and it was a ghost town i legit thought they closed early cuz it was just me and the concession stand cashier. I think Disney & Marvel will have all the top domestic movies until Jurassic and Superman. Kinda crazy Cap 4 is gonna be the Number 1 U.S. movie until the end of May Edited March 27 by Gorjesspazze9
Gorjesspazze9 Posted March 27 Posted March 27 17 hours ago, AdrianTrav said: Hmm...Rachel is really Box Office poison. West Side Story, Shazam, Y2K and now Snow White... Thats like 4 out of 5 movies in her filmography. Yeah im suprise she still getting lead roles. Probably will be a secondary character for the next few years at this rate
Lovett Posted March 27 Posted March 27 18 hours ago, AdrianTrav said: Hmm...Rachel is really Box Office poison. West Side Story, Shazam, Y2K and now Snow White... Thats like 4 out of 5 movies in her filmography. Such a stupid narrative to blame one person for a film's underperformance and then label them 'box office poison'. 4
Da Vinci Posted March 27 Posted March 27 Snow White bombing won't end Rachel Zegler's career just like how Aladdin smashing didn't start Mena Massoud's career
smartalek22 Posted March 29 Posted March 29 On 3/27/2025 at 9:59 PM, Lovett said: Such a stupid narrative to blame one person for a film's underperformance and then label them 'box office poison'. Plenty of people on here blame pop girls they dislike for the films they appear in bombing I never see anyone except the pop girl's own fanbase defending it I will name two examples, Gaga's JFAD and Taylor's Cats, since those two are the antis of your fanbase
Lovett Posted March 29 Posted March 29 1 hour ago, smartalek22 said: Plenty of people on here blame pop girls they dislike for the films they appear in bombing I never see anyone except the pop girl's own fanbase defending it I will name two examples, Gaga's JFAD and Taylor's Cats, since those two are the antis of your fanbase The difference is that those are blatant jokes for baiting fanbases on a forum like this, the other is attempting to be a genuine narrative. If you can't see the difference, there's not much else I can say. 4 1
Elementary Posted March 30 Posted March 30 So how much will Disney have to write off from that trash movie alone? 200M-300M? Basically wiped off all the profit from Stitch and Mufasa combined.
New Edition Posted March 30 Posted March 30 Does Rachel Zegler deserve all the hate she's getting and can someone explain to me what she said that made people hate her?
Da Vinci Posted March 30 Posted March 30 18 minutes ago, New Edition said: Does Rachel Zegler deserve all the hate she's getting and can someone explain to me what she said that made people hate her?
Gorjesspazze9 Posted March 30 Posted March 30 7 hours ago, Elementary said: So how much will Disney have to write off from that trash movie alone? 200M-300M? Basically wiped off all the profit from Stitch and Mufasa combined. Disney don't have to write it off. They just won't make a profit. They will be fine. They have had multiple $100M losses before. Think your underestimating how much money Disney has. They will make all that back this year alone with Avatar and marvel movies, let alone lilo and stitch.
Lovett Posted March 30 Posted March 30 5 hours ago, New Edition said: Does Rachel Zegler deserve all the hate she's getting No, she very much does not. 1
kellebrity98 Posted March 30 Posted March 30 On 3/27/2025 at 2:59 PM, Lovett said: Such a stupid narrative to blame one person for a film's underperformance and then label them 'box office poison'. like all these movies that were mentioned had **** scripts and literally Zegler's performance were the only thing they praised. I read many Snow White reviews and they always praised her and her singing. On the other hand she was brilliant in Hunger Games and she received huge praise for that too. Give her a good script. 1
Europe Posted March 30 Posted March 30 On 3/27/2025 at 1:14 PM, Gorjesspazze9 said: Theaters in general really are on the decline, unless it's a blockbuster event movie. I walked into my local theater last weekend and it was a ghost town Another reason is there are very few good movies being made these years. Even if someone wants to go to the cinema, there is nothing to see. For example now, we have: Captain america - okay, but everyone who is interested saw it already Mickey 17 - horribe base idea that never should have been made in the 1st place - of course people don't want to watch it Snow White - deviated from the original too much - of course people don't want to watch it And that's it. Why would theaters have people in them when they don't show anything of note? 1
Gorjesspazze9 Posted March 30 Posted March 30 (edited) 5 hours ago, New Edition said: Does Rachel Zegler deserve all the hate she's getting and can someone explain to me what she said that made people hate her? She just speaks her mind in public and social media. Spoiler Conservatives are made she isn't afraid to respond back to the hate speech she got for saying f Donald Trump, and bringing awareness to the Palestine conflict. But the big issue was that people were initially outraged Disney didn't cast a white girl to be Snow White, Rachel basically said she is an actress and is doing her job and people have a problem she won't back down from that comment seriously they made a big deal because she is an actress trying to work. It's just more reflection of the political landscape of America right now. overall she is a PR disaster for that side, so Disney stop her from doing interviews and Marketing rollout for the movie to appease the audience that say they went Woke. It don't help that the movie is apparently horrible, and it's flopping. honestly I think the whole thing is overblown. The audience needs to stop complaining about these movies and just don't go watch them. Like why tf are grown adults just not watching or engaging in content you don't like. And all this over Snow White😭 Disney is to blame for not protecting thier actors or having a back bone. Just hire a publicist so she don't say anything that will further outrage them, and make better movies. None of the live action movies have been that great anyways so idk why people are shocked. i could be missing some context, cuz I haven't really paid much attention to this massive controversy. Mainly cuz I don't care enough Edited March 30 by Gorjesspazze9 1
Gorjesspazze9 Posted March 30 Posted March 30 9 minutes ago, Europe said: Another reason is there are very few good movies being made these years. Even if someone wants to go to the cinema, there is nothing to see. For example now, we have: Captain america - okay, but everyone who is interested saw it already Mickey 17 - horribe base idea that never should have been made in the 1st place - of course people don't want to watch it Snow White - deviated from the original too much - of course people don't want to watch it And that's it. Why would theaters have people in them when they don't show anything of note? True. This is exactly how I feel, if i wasn't a marvel fan i literally wouldn't have had any real reason to go this year, and it's Already April nothing good is coming out till May at least. That almost half of the year with nothing worthwhile in theaters. 2
Europe Posted March 30 Posted March 30 2 minutes ago, Gorjesspazze9 said: True. This is exactly how I feel, if i wasn't a marvel fan i literally wouldn't have had any real reason to go this year, and it's Already April nothing good is coming out till May at least. That almost half of the year with nothing worthwhile in theaters. Precisely. And it was the same case last year. I live close to a cinema. I have a friend who also loves going. We would be absolutely happy to go more often - if only there was something to see. 1
Elementary Posted March 30 Posted March 30 12 hours ago, Gorjesspazze9 said: Disney don't have to write it off. They just won't make a profit. They will be fine. They have had multiple $100M losses before. Think your underestimating how much money Disney has. They will make all that back this year alone with Avatar and marvel movies, let alone lilo and stitch. You must be new if you think this is going to lose 100M. It costed 250M in production alone and at least 100M more to promote and it hasnt even made half of that
Gorjesspazze9 Posted March 30 Posted March 30 1 hour ago, Elementary said: You must be new if you think this is going to lose 100M. It costed 250M in production alone and at least 100M more to promote and it hasnt even made half of that I'm well aware of how the the box office and Hollywood work no **** it's gonna lose money. It's not gonna lose $300M.
PokiTails Posted March 30 Posted March 30 Sonic 3 is at $491m box office now Hope we get Knuckles season 2 in 2026 with a hint in the end towards Sonic 4. Then start the roll out for the 4th movie. So so excited. 1
Elementary Posted March 31 Posted March 31 1 hour ago, Gorjesspazze9 said: It's not gonna lose $300M. It's not gonna lose $100M either. And no one wants to wake up to that number in their screen, not even Disney.
Gorjesspazze9 Posted Monday at 03:34 PM Posted Monday at 03:34 PM I still don't think that will be enough. They need to innovate the entire theatrical experience, not just modernize. But actually do something that will truly compete with streaming. I think AMC is trying thier best but I do think theaters just won't ever be the hub they use to be. They are going the way of Malls
Gorjesspazze9 Posted Monday at 09:39 PM Posted Monday at 09:39 PM (edited) 21 hours ago, Elementary said: It's not gonna lose $100M either. Well would you look at that Edited Monday at 09:39 PM by Gorjesspazze9 1 2
Recommended Posts