Vermillion Posted June 13 Author Posted June 13 @GhostBox Who the heck will they try to find that has standing? Someone harmed by mifepristone? An argument on that despite efficacy and proper warmings? Good luck.
VOSS Posted June 13 Posted June 13 I read the opinion and Thomas' concurrence and I didn't see any hints about who they thought might have standing here. Thomas barely even talked about the case, he was just complaining about associational standing
Vermillion Posted June 13 Author Posted June 13 14 minutes ago, VOSS said: I read the opinion and Thomas' concurrence and I didn't see any hints about who they thought might have standing here. Thomas barely even talked about the case, he was just complaining about associational standing Well then the headlines I'm reading are way off. The rulings being as opaque as ever with this court….
VOSS Posted June 13 Posted June 13 2 hours ago, Espresso said: Well then the headlines I'm reading are way off. The rulings being as opaque as ever with this court…. What are the headlines you're seeing?
Recommended Posts