Vermillion Posted June 13 Author Share Posted June 13 @GhostBox Who the heck will they try to find that has standing? Someone harmed by mifepristone? An argument on that despite efficacy and proper warmings? Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VOSS Posted June 13 Share Posted June 13 I read the opinion and Thomas' concurrence and I didn't see any hints about who they thought might have standing here. Thomas barely even talked about the case, he was just complaining about associational standing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vermillion Posted June 13 Author Share Posted June 13 14 minutes ago, VOSS said: I read the opinion and Thomas' concurrence and I didn't see any hints about who they thought might have standing here. Thomas barely even talked about the case, he was just complaining about associational standing Well then the headlines I'm reading are way off. The rulings being as opaque as ever with this court…. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VOSS Posted June 13 Share Posted June 13 2 hours ago, Espresso said: Well then the headlines I'm reading are way off. The rulings being as opaque as ever with this court…. What are the headlines you're seeing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts