Jump to content

Kesha - 'Gag Order'


Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, $ebert said:

I expected it to do better :deadbanana:

They gave Rainbow a 6.8, so :rip:

  • Replies 5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • TomTom

    600

  • CroNich

    505

  • SmittenCake

    277

  • josesuxx

    216

Posted (edited)

Oh lord i'm honestly nervous about the album quality but that pitchfork review raised my expextations ok kesha we see you

 

I'm excited to see what she has to say in her lyrics about everything happening with her

Edited by cyclone
Posted

What time is it in NZ?

Posted
18 minutes ago, TomTom2288 said:

4/5 from Why Now (doesn‘t count for MC).

 

https://whynow.co.uk/read/gag-order-kesha-review

Not the ones that don’t count scoring higher. What would her metacritic sitting at now? I expected higher ngl 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Joesuxx said:

What time is it in NZ?

Almost 10pm

Posted

But the 3 singles we got so far are already better than High Road :katie:

Posted
10 minutes ago, the70s said:

But the 3 singles we got so far are already better than High Road :katie:

Which is why there's literally no way anyone would seriously believe High Compilation is better 

Posted
Just now, josesuxx said:

High Compilation

:rofl:

Posted (edited)
On 5/18/2023 at 11:42 AM, CroNich said:

Not the ones that don’t count scoring higher. What would her metacritic sitting at now? I expected higher ngl 

Counts towards MC (change compared to High Road):

  • The Independent: 100 (+20)
  • Rolling Stone: 80 (=)
  • The Line of Best Fit: 80 (-10)
  • The Observer: 80 (=)
  • Pitchfork: 71 (+12)
  • Clash: 70 (-10)
  • Slant: 70 (=)
  • AllMusic: 60 (-10)
  • NME: 60 (=)
  • musicOMH: 60 (-20)

Does not count towards MC (change compared to High Road):

  • The Herald: 80 (N/A)
  • The Arts Desk: 80 (+20)
  • WhyNow: 80 (N/A)
  • Evening Standard: 80 (=)
  • iNews: 80 (N/A)
Edited by TomTom2288
Posted

Will we get a Japanese bonus track, too? Big Bad Wolf remains that girl! 

Posted
1 minute ago, glitterqueen said:

Will we get a Japanese bonus track, too? Big Bad Wolf remains that girl! 

I don't think we will

  • Thanks 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, TomTom2288 said:

Counts towards MC (change compared to High Road):

  • Pitchfork: 71 (+12)
  • Slant: 70 (=)
  • musicOMH: 60 (-20)

Does not count towards MC (change compared to High Road):

  • The Herald: 80 (N/A)
  • The Arts Desk: 80 (N/A)
  • WhyNow: 80 (N/A)

The Arts Desk gave High Road a 60, so it's a 20 points increase 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Alaska. said:

The Arts Desk gave High Road a 60, so it's a 20 points increase 

Oh, okay. It looked like they didn't review HR.

Posted (edited)
59 minutes ago, TomTom2288 said:

Counts towards MC (change compared to High Road):

  • Pitchfork: 71 (+12)
  • Slant: 70 (=)
  • musicOMH: 60 (-20)

Does not count towards MC (change compared to High Road):

  • The Herald: 80 (N/A)
  • The Arts Desk: 80 (+20)
  • WhyNow: 80 (N/A)

Okay the gay intern at musicOMH that reviewed the album needs to be fired 

Edited by CroNich
Posted
1 minute ago, CroNich said:

Okay the gay intern at musicOMH that reviewed the album needs to be fired 

Fingers crossed that the Kim stan from PopMatters who gave High Road a 30/100 has been fired already.

Posted

OMG she is 3/3 this era

Posted

Wait at pitchfork stanning a bit :clap3:

  • Like 1
Posted

Something To Believe In is huge. I can’t get past it. 

  • Like 1
Posted

AOTYYYYYYYY IS HEREEEEEE

  • Like 1
Posted

I believe this is her best body of work; it is well-crafted in comparison.

  • Like 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, bearman said:

Something To Believe In is huge. I can’t get past it. 

Whewwww :jonny: my most anticipated song, just gotta wait 10 more hours 

  • Like 1
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.