Jump to content

K-Pop Thread: 2023 Archive


Recommended Posts

Posted

I never come into this thread but sheesh the mess in here :skull: Might need to stop by more often. :gaycat1:

 

p.s. NewJeans > all other K-Pop groups

  • Replies 132.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Save-Me-Oprah

    8662

  • Pluto6

    4626

  • Witnessed ET

    3693

  • illia

    3617

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
6 minutes ago, lgaga1fan said:

  

The notion that people over the age of 30 don't know who any of these people are so ******* funny sorry you're being quite delulu. Who do you think is listening to the radio stations that play these artists same songs constantly? its OLDER generations :ahh:

Yeah the days of our grandparents being aware of the current pop stars are long gone but at least our parents still know who Olivia, Billie and Doja are.

Posted

[Half of essay deleted due to irrelevance]

 

34 minutes ago, Century said:

When you're alleging misconduct and even slavery, pointing out that these contracts are actually progressive is relevant information, you just don't like that it pokes a hole in your fantasy world.

So progressive that they've provoked multiple lawsuits from idols contracted under them...

 

34 minutes ago, Century said:

The contract length is the specific reason Tao sued for. The contract lengths were scrutinized in court and were held up. Don't blame me for the Korean legal system not aligning with your story. I'm not the one being factually incorrect here. If SM was doing something illegal they wouldn't openly discuss it in press releases.

The contract length was upheld because SM uses a loophole, which is what I was saying in the first place. The argument you are making is cyclical and redundant. Tao (and Luhan and Kr*s) also sued for exploitation, issues with profits/pay (an issue that has arisen again this year) and discrimination.

 

34 minutes ago, Century said:

Your own fav leaving SM in 2015? These mental gymnastics are getting so severe you're forgetting the person you decided to start going qanon over. :ahh:Where's your example of an SM idol saying "I wanted to leave at the 7 year mark but SM Entertainment wouldn't let me". Even if Jessica didn't exist I wouldn't be the one with the burden of proof here, you're the one making serious allegations.

Jessica was a debuted idol of SM between August 2007- August 2015, that's not 7 years :rip:

 

34 minutes ago, Century said:

Amber was mad that the company didn't support her and her group more, she has NEVER said she was forced to stay there. She also had the opportunity to just do nothing after f(x) went on hiatus but continued working. You keep on making leaps in logic because you started with a conclusion that was spoon-fed to you in a work of FICTION and have been working backwards from it.

34 minutes ago, Century said:

This I was wrong about. They renewed without a public statement. I thought I remembered a press release about it though.

There was no press release. 

 

34 minutes ago, Century said:

Still waiting on ANY proof of an over 10 year contract btw. Not even TVXQ alleged that, that one was a Zack original. 

You'll have to update yourself on the allegations made by EXO-CBX or the latest reports about NCT's contract time, all of which were discussed at length in this thread.

 

At the end of the day, you have launched into this excessive rant in defense of a company that has documented evidence in its past of shady practises against its idols. In the process, you've levied misogynistic attacks against Jessica and claimed that I've made the whole thing up, in pursuit of some strange purist SM company stanning agenda. Unfortunately, everything you have written thus far in your interjections have been riddled with inaccuracies. 

 

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, ANTIclimatic said:

I mean I wouldn’t say that. 
 

sabrina-brier-sabrina-brier-tiktok.gif

As someone who is gen z with all my siblings and friends also being gen z this is very much a stretch. Even though they’re more successful I would truly say that someone like Bebe rexha is way more known then them at least to my demographic.

 

sabrina-brier-sabrina-brier-tiktok.gif

Like I said, this just becomes an anecdote battle and those are truly useless. I have the exact opposite stories of you where people who dont give any fucks about kpop have asked me if "the pink haired one is jimin" after their SNL performance in 2019 (they knew I was a kpop fan). At the end of the day data is the only thing that we can really trust, and there are no surveys that have asked the American GP about BTS (that I know of)

 

sabrina-brier-sabrina-brier-tiktok.gif

Edited by armink
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Zack said:

[Half of essay deleted due to irrelevance]

 

So progressive that they've provoked multiple lawsuits from idols contracted under them...

 

The contract length was upheld because SM uses a loophole, which is what I was saying in the first place. The argument you are making is cyclical and redundant. Tao (and Luhan and Kr*s) also sued for exploitation, issues with profits/pay (an issue that has arisen again this year) and discrimination.

 

Jessica was a debuted idol of SM between August 2007- August 2015, that's not 7 years :rip:

 

There was no press release. 

 

You'll have to update yourself on the allegations made by EXO-CBX or the latest reports about NCT's contract time, all of which were discussed at length in this thread.

 

At the end of the day, you have launched into this excessive rant in defense of a company that has documented evidence in its past of shady practises against its idols. In the process, you've levied misogynistic attacks against Jessica and claimed that I've made the whole thing up, in pursuit of some strange purist SM company stanning agenda. Unfortunately, everything you have written thus far in your interjections have been riddled with inaccuracies. 

 

The single inaccuracy in my post was about Red Velvet's 2021 renewal vs every word of your initial post being wrong and backed by a personal agenda. You're projecting. I'll take the erasing my main point as an admission of some kind since thats the best anybody will ever get out of you. :fish:

Edited by Century
Posted

blackpink can be considered technically disbanded atp. there's no active contract for the group :michael:

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Century said:

The single inaccuracy in my post was about Red Velvet's 2021 renewal vs every word of your initial post being wrong and backed by a personal agenda. You're projecting. I'll take the erasing my main point as an admission of some kind since thats the best anybody will ever get out of you. :fish:

You mean aside from the repetitive rants against Jessica, the insistence that the SM idols discussed have had the option to leave after 7 years (with zero proof of this), the incorrect information regarding contract lengths of EXO, f(x), Jessica and others, plus the incorrect information about Red Velvet. 

 

It's the mark of someone who has run out of logical and viable arguments when you are forced to pivot to claiming I'm wrong and lying with zero evidence to support it. 

 

I snipped out the first part of your post because it was excessive and I just don't care to read attacks about Jessica which have no place in this particular topic. I also felt bad for others in this thread getting confronted by walls of text from you which I then have to dissect due to the inaccuracies and spurious claims being made about me and what I have said. There is no admission to be taken from that. 

 

Edited by Zack
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, Zack said:

You mean aside from the repetitive rants against Jessica, the insistence that the SM idols discussed have had the option to leave after 7 years (with zero proof of this), the incorrect information regarding contract lengths of EXO, f(x) and others, plus the incorrect information about Red Velvet. 

 

It's the mark of someone who has run out of logical and viable arguments when you are forced to pivot to claiming I'm wrong and lying with zero evidence to support it. 

 

I snipped out the first part of your post because it was excessive and I just don't care to read attacks about Jessica which have no place in this particular topic. I also felt bad for others in this thread getting confronted by walls of text from you which I then have to dissect due to the inaccuracies and spurious claims being made about me and what I have said. There is no admission to be taken from that. 

 

Again your own fav left SM before the 10 year mark with 0 retribution. You're the one who needs to back up their claims and came with nothing but hand waving and skirting around the topic. There is no over 10 year slave contract for anybody. There is no proof for a 10 year contract for any GGs. The repeated attempts to delete these facts from your responses and to change the topic didn't make me forget.

 

Characterizing me as a company stan purist when I am a known NCT anti and spent my summer complaining about Red Velvet vanishing and joking about terrorism against the company is a choice. But your posts on this topic are full of chosing to ignore facts and invent a new reality.

Edited by Century
Posted
1 minute ago, Century said:

Again your own fav left SM before the 10 year mark with 0 retribution. You're the one who needs to back up their claims and came with nothing but hand waving and skirting around the topic. There is no over 10 year slave contract for anybody. There is no proof for a 10 year contract for any GGs.

 

Characterizing me as a company stan purist when I am a known NCT anti and spend almost every day this summer complaining about Red Velvet vanishing is a choice. But your posts on this topic are full of chosing to ignore facts and invent a new reality.

We were discussing 7 year mark, not 10 year mark. I only ever said that SM has been using a loophole to extend the contracts of their idols beyond the legal maximum 7 year term. 

 

It was at that point, that you jumped in claiming that it was a myth, that I was lying and that it was all a construct of my imagination based off of a book. :rip:

 

When in reality, it has already been known for some time now, that no SM idol has been able to leave at the 7 year mark for at least the past decade, that there has been evidence of this through the contract end dates of idols, evidence submitted in lawsuits and statements showing that SM contracts go beyond 7 years and that several idols have been unhappy with the length and the restrictive terms. None of this is fiction. It's out there and documented and evidenced by the actions of the people involved.

 

You decided to make an attempt to try and discredit me for being a Jessica stan (as evidenced by all your responses to me containing excessive levels of ranting about her, when she is of no major relevance to this topic...maybe my avi just triggers you, who knows!) and utterly failed in the arguments you were making. 

Posted

These essays… ladies, it’s just kpop. :swan:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

Now let me move on to an album that really IS worthy of essays :clap3:

 

 

Edited by Zack
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, Zack said:

We were discussing 7 year mark, not 10 year mark. I only ever said that SM has been using a loophole to extend the contracts of their idols beyond the legal maximum 7 year term. 

Not a loophole, Tao sued specifically for that and case law is where legal loopholes get closed. The contracts are perfectly legal.

 

Since you seem to have a memory issue let me refresh you on what you actually said:

 

If you are writing essays and so unable to stand by what you said that you have to change the story and hope nobody notices it's safe to say I'm not the one who utterly failed here. You alleged over 10 year contract terms and kept doubling down until you decided it was "irrelevant" and changed the story. You've also backed down from "slavery" to "mistreatment". You lied. 🤥

10 minutes ago, Zack said:

 

You decided to make an attempt to try and discredit me for being a Jessica stan (as evidenced by all your responses to me containing excessive levels of ranting about her, when she is of no major relevance to this topic...maybe my avi just triggers you, who knows!) and utterly failed in the arguments you were making. 

Your post discredited itself by being full of lies motivated by your Jessica victim complex.

Edited by Century
Posted
7 minutes ago, Save-Me-Oprah said:

These essays… ladies, it’s just kpop. :swan:

It's not my fault that their idol is a lying grifter and it inspired them.

Posted
1 minute ago, Century said:

Not a loophole, Tao sued specifically for that and case law is where legal loopholes get closed. The contracts are perfectly legal.

 

Since you seem to have a memory issue let me refresh you on what you actually said:

 

If you are writing essays and so unable to stand by what you said that you have to change the story and hope nobody notices it's safe to say I'm not the one who utterly failed here.

Your post discredited itself by being full of lies motivated by your Jessica victim complex.

I've written considerably less than you, and I'm well aware of what I wrote. 

 

If you're referring to my comments on NCT, there is no contradiction with anything I've said. SM has stated their contracts are "longer than usual" and will not expire until the end of 2024 at the earliest (which would be over 10 years since some members such as Taeyong began activities). Ten also told fans in a live/online fanmeeting in 2021 that The 7th Sense members have at least 5 years left of contract time (at that time), which also supports this. 

 

But never mind the facts (since they don't appear to matter to you), this whole exercise for you has been about attacking Jessica, that much is clear. Hopefully one day you'll get over whatever issues you have with her that cause such excessive reactions. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Century said:

It's not my fault that their idol is a lying grifter and it inspired them.

All 9 members of SNSD are angels and SM will burn in hell one day (next to YG and JYP) for what he did to undermine the greatest girl group ever for his greed. Can we at least celebrate that? :celestial:

  • Like 4
Posted

These Essays are longer then a SM contract🤭 Yall ever thought of Appling for an Intership program 

spacer.png

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Eternium said:

All 9 members of SNSD are angels and SM will burn in hell one day (next to YG and JYP) for what he did to undermine the greatest girl group ever for his greed. Can we at least celebrate that? :celestial:

SNSD has 8 members but other than that spill. :gaycat:

Posted
8 minutes ago, Zack said:

I've written considerably less than you, and I'm well aware of what I wrote. 

 

If you're referring to my comments on NCT, there is no contradiction with anything I've said. SM has stated their contracts are "longer than usual" and will not expire until the end of 2024 at the earliest (which would be over 10 years since some members such as Taeyong began activities). Ten also told fans in a live/online fanmeeting in 2021 that The 7th Sense members have at least 5 years left of contract time (at that time), which also supports this. 

 

But never mind the facts (since they don't appear to matter to you), this whole exercise for you has been about attacking Jessica, that much is clear. Hopefully one day you'll get over whatever issues you have with her that cause such excessive reactions. 

That would not be longer than 10 years. You still have no evidence for 10 year GG contracts either. Just take the L sis. You got caught.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Gorjesspazze9 said:

These Essays are longer then a SM contract🤭 Yall ever thought of Appling for an Intership program 

spacer.png

I'm at work rn :biblio:

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Century said:

That would not be longer than 10 years. You still have no evidence for 10 year GG contracts either. Just take the L sis. You got caught.

We've already been through all of this. Still waiting for your evidence that SM idols have been able to freely leave at the 7 year point though! 

 

You tried and failed to get a gotcha moment, so the only L to take belongs to you. But whatever helps you sleep at night! 

 

oxvu4S6.gif

 

Edited by Zack
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Zack said:

We've already been through all of this. Still waiting for your evidence that SM idols can leave at the 7 year point though! 

 

You tried and failed to get a gotcha moment, so the only L to take belongs to you. But whatever helps you sleep at night! 

 

oxvu4S6.gif

 

The evidence is in the gif. You really gave up for the first time huh :ahh:

  • Confused 1
Posted

 

 

seeing idols interact warms my heart :heart:

giselle is gorgeous btw

 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Century said:

I'm at work rn :biblio:

me too:dancehall: don’t tell my boss I snuck into his office to use this computer to download SNSD gifs. I think I left a computer virus on it💀

spacer.png

 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, Aniston's Boobs said:

 

 

seeing idols interact warms my heart :heart:

giselle is gorgeous btw

 

I like Giselle and Somi's friendship, it seems really genuine and cute. They did a vlog together a while back as well:clap3:

 

Giselle being confused about whether to speak Japanese or Korean to XG was cute too 

Posted

Sooyoung & Yuri having back to back solo international fanmeets this week:clap3:

sone Fandom still showing up 15 years later. 

  • Like 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.