Jump to content

Kim Petras on Dr. Luke: "I have nothing to be ashamed of” + Kesha responds


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Ferret said:

Yes doja is Disgusting and should be called out with the same energy Kim is 

If ATRL truly cared about Dr. Luke being a "rapist" they would boycott ANYTHING he was involved in but they don't. Absolute clowns. :cm: 

Edited by FightForTanas

  • Replies 560
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Alfred

    31

  • TomTom

    29

  • Ferret

    25

  • CroNich

    24

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
2 minutes ago, cockatoo said:

Saweetie was actually asked about it in a couple of interviews and there was a fair amount of backlash afterwards considering she wasn't even signed to him. Latto got her fair share too. But the difference is it was literally only a couple of songs whereas Kim has had whole projects executive produced by this man, plus he's not the only problematic person she's worked with.

Wow you’ve really done your research haven’t you? It’s laughable how you say those artists got their “fair share” of backlash when you full well know that it lasted for 3 seconds. Kim has been unable to escape backlash. She can talk at a concert and be recorded against her consent and then it be posted online with a “Kim really is the worst” caption. She can literally never win. Her latest single isn’t even produced by Luke and guess what? The same ppl crucifying her for working with the man actually had the audacity to say “she needs luke again” All this just proves that the anti-Kim argument is clownery at its best. Ppl will hate this woman just for breathing. THAT is tea. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Ferret said:

This. Who cares if she sígned before or afterwards. She’s still making him rich. It’s like you WANT to live in a contradiction. Doja fans should be the first time Shut up.

You really wrote that and still don't understand why Kim got more backlash?

Posted
Just now, Alfred said:

She can literally never win. 

Finally we agree on something! :bird:

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, ZIVERT said:

It’s just that the argument is so hypocritical. “Don’t listen to Kim Petras, she’s trash and her music is unethically made” like the other Luke projects aren’t all unethically made too. The money is still going to the same place, whether the artist likes him or not - they’re still working with him.

They are all unethically made, girl. The thing is 1) I personally don't listen to anything he touches but 2) don't riot against Doja Cat because she's ultimately in the same ugly contract situation Kesha was in so yeah, the people that do listen to her are supporting Luke which I don't agree with but... I don't think Doja should be punished because she is unwillingly in this situation. Kim is not!

Edited by undermyskin
Posted
8 minutes ago, undermyskin said:

enough yall. in this same very thread that you came in and posted this message, several other users have posted receipts of other artists getting dragged for working with Luke. Kim is not the only one. Kim, however, is the only one that has publicly denounced Kesha's allegations time and time again

 

2 minutes ago, josesuxx said:

This is simply not true. The backlash is just more evident cause she's only known by LGBT audiences (= the only people that care about Dr Luke being a rapist), the rest of the artists that work with Dr Luke have a much broader or different audience and the criticism is clearly less noticeable.   

Well you both are entirely entitled to your opinion, but I personally believe that there is a disproportionate amount of backlash against Kim, especially considering she isn't even as mainstream as some of the other artists who are working with him. You can say other artists have had backlash too, but you'd be lying if you pretended that it was anywhere near the level that Kim gets. Some of the very same people in this thread who are criticising her are stans of artists that have worked with him in the past few years post-Kesha lawsuit. I'm not even defending that Kim works with Luke, but I just find it an interesting observation that people find it easy to make excuses for other artists, but the one trans artist he works with is the one who takes the majority of the heat. I just find it interesting that's all

Posted
2 hours ago, Psycho said:

Her meltdown on Twitter right now is beyond pathetic

She always is and the gays here eat it up 

Posted
Just now, DojaCat said:

You really wrote that and still don't understand why Kim got more backlash?

who cares when she was signed. if you truly cared about this you would boycott anything that makes him even a livable wage, which you dont do this User Doja Cat

Posted
2 minutes ago, FightForTanas said:

If ATRL truly cared about Dr. Luke being a "rapist" they would boycott ANYTHING he was involved in but they don't. Absolute clowns. :cm: 

And if ATRL really cared about trans representation and transphobia they would be able to name more than 1 trans artist.

Posted
1 minute ago, Miichael said:

 

Well you both are entirely entitled to your opinion, but I personally believe that there is a disproportionate amount of backlash against Kim, especially considering she isn't even as mainstream as some of the other artists who are working with him. You can say other artists have had backlash too, but you'd be lying if you pretended that it was anywhere near the level that Kim gets. Some of the very same people in this thread who are criticising her are stans of artists that have worked with him in the past few years post-Kesha lawsuit. I'm not even defending that Kim works with Luke, but I just find it an interesting observation that people find it easy to make excuses for other artists, but the one trans artist he works with is the one who takes the majority of the heat. I just find it interesting that's all

And this also needs to be called out!

Posted
51 minutes ago, Nickimeetsatrl said:

You guys are always more mad at the female that works with these men than the men or the actual predator. Such weird energy. 

Because in this case it's the women that are keeping this man's career in the industry alive. It would be the same if, for example, Nickelodeon got Dan Schneider to produce another one of their shows. We would be mad at Nickelodeon because they're the ones supporting him.

Posted
1 minute ago, DojaCat said:

And if ATRL really cared about trans representation and transphobia they would be able to name more than 1 trans artist.

The funny thing is there's so many better trans artists, and the same Petras Stans that scream "transphobia" don't listen to them because they're not thin, white, Eurocentric women. :rip:

Posted
1 minute ago, KatyPrismSpirit said:

who cares when she was signed. if you truly cared about this you would boycott anything that makes him even a livable wage, which you dont do this User Doja Cat

I personally don't stream anything he produced user KatyPrismSpirit

Posted
3 minutes ago, DojaCat said:

And if ATRL really cared about trans representation and transphobia they would be able to name more than 1 trans artist.

Lmao the deflection?? Help :rip:

Posted

Not hacked :bibliahh:

Posted
1 minute ago, Miichael said:

 

Well you both are entirely entitled to your opinion, but I personally believe that there is a disproportionate amount of backlash against Kim, especially considering she isn't even as mainstream as some of the other artists who are working with him. You can say other artists have had backlash too, but you'd be lying if you pretended that it was anywhere near the level that Kim gets. Some of the very same people in this thread who are criticising her are stans of artists that have worked with him in the past few years post-Kesha lawsuit. I'm not even defending that Kim works with Luke, but I just find it an interesting observation that people find it easy to make excuses for other artists, but the one trans artist he works with is the one who takes the majority of the heat. I just find it interesting that's all

Well then they're hypocrites and I personally despise every artist that works with than man equally, but y'all point out that she seems to get more backlash than the rest like it changes the fact that she's not ashamed of willingly working with Dr Luke? Like somehow people giving "a disproportionate amount of backlash against Kim" are worse than her or something :skull:

 

She ain't a victim here. Maybe if she hadn't chosen to work with a rapist she wouldn't get hate, she got the short end of the stick but it's solely her fault. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Alfred said:

Lmao the deflection?? Help :rip:

You're still here? One would think seeing your fave at the top would inspire you to get a job and do something in life,but guess not, how's the food stamps?

Posted

The Ritaprint already 

Posted (edited)

her team is lying saying shes hacked now? Kim sweetie theres only sm i can do :rip:

Edited by KatyPrismSpirit
Posted
5 minutes ago, DojaCat said:

I personally don't stream anything he produced user KatyPrismSpirit

These users clap backs are sending me :bibliahh:

Posted

I am so tired of this argument. It's been the same thing for the last 6 years of her career: "stop working with a r*****", when half the music industry also works with him too.

 

Just leave her alone. She's got nothing to do with the argument between Kesha & Luke. She's a client working with a talented producer.

Posted
6 minutes ago, gettsleazy said:

The funny thing is there's so many better trans artists, and the same Petras Stans that scream "transphobia" don't listen to them because they're not thin, white, Eurocentric women. :rip:

:coffee:

 

Posted
2 hours ago, ZIVERT said:

She’s right, she’s not the only one that works with him, she’s just the only one that gets attacked by bored Kesha stans 

Bloop :turkey:

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Ferret said:

Doja is helping dr Luke getting richer million times more than Kim. Dont be delusional 

Doja cat doesn’t have a choice though. She signed with him in 2013, one whole year before any allegations were made public against him. She barely works with him, he just attaches his name onto her work so he can collect a pay check. 
 

Kim on the other hand made a CHOICE (and continues to choose) to work with/sign with him after the allegations were made public. She openly defended him saying she doesn’t believe the allegations are true. Can yall please point out where the other girls have done the same? Y’all are pulling out the transphobic card because either you know her behaviour is deplorable and there’s no way to redeem it so it’s all your tiny pea sized brains can pull together as a defence for Kim, or y’all are even dumber than that and genuinely don’t understand the severity and impact to women’s rights and freedoms defending an abuser and alleged rapist and calling a female victim a liar and can only comprehend this as some kind of transphobic attack, because ‘there couldn’t possibly be any thing else to criticise about a person other than their gender identity’.

 

I bet the gays calling out us being transphobic probably know nothing about the history of trans people in our society and trans rights. If you did you probably wouldn’t be so quick to defend a rapist apologiser. Just saying.

 

 

Edited by CroNich
Posted
1 minute ago, josesuxx said:

Well then they're hypocrites and I personally despise every artist that works with than man equally, but y'all point out that she seems to get more backlash than the rest like it changes the fact that she's not ashamed of willingly working with Dr Luke? Like somehow people giving "a disproportionate amount of backlash against Kim" are worse than her or something :skull:

 

She ain't a victim here. Maybe if she hadn't chosen to work with a rapist she wouldn't get hate, she got the short end of the stick but it's solely her fault. 

Please don't put words in my mouth. Nowhere have I said that anyone is worse than anyone, and nowhere have I defended her working with Dr Luke. I am merely pointing out some of the hypocrisy I have noticed in the reaction among the stan community which at times can be pretty blatant.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.