mercurialworld Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 (edited) https://www.insider.com/meta-bans-influencer-andrew-tate-facebook-instagram-2022-8 paws up monsters everyone betta be jumping yw for not embedding a pic of him Edited August 19, 2022 by mercurialworld Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyclone Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 This is disturbing and sets a precedent, we shouldn't allow big tech to have total control over silencing people like this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BOOMBAYAH Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 Mixed feelings about this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Virgos Groove Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KatyPrismSpirit Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 big tech is... silencing those with opposing views. i hate him and whatever he says is gibberish but come on. this goes too far and happends too much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cockatoo Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 Just now, cyclone said: This is disturbing and sets a precedent me watching andrew tate's videos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krustysalt Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 2 minutes ago, cyclone said: This is disturbing and sets a precedent, we shouldn't allow big tech to have total control over silencing people like this. Are you ******* serious? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James_Dean Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 4 minutes ago, cyclone said: This is disturbing and sets a precedent, we shouldn't allow big tech to have total control over silencing people like this. Imagine defending that garbage excuse of a being Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cockatoo Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 bIg tEcH SiLeNcInG vIeWs the views in question being a human trafficker who was indoctrinating young boys into misogyny and normalising grooming and sexual assault Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CandleGuy Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 4 minutes ago, cyclone said: This is disturbing and sets a precedent, we shouldn't allow big tech to have total control over silencing people like this. 2 minutes ago, KatyPrismSpirit said: big tech is... silencing those with opposing views. i hate him and whatever he says is gibberish but come on. this goes too far and happends too much And? These are private companies. They have the choice to allow and not allow content on their private platforms. Do you want the US government to step in and disallow Meta from doing this? How would that even work with a Chinese company like Tik Tok? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krustysalt Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 4 minutes ago, KatyPrismSpirit said: big tech is... silencing those with opposing views. i hate him and whatever he says is gibberish but come on. this goes too far and happends too much mocking victims of sexual violence is literally against Facebook's rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KatyPrismSpirit Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 Just now, CandleGuy said: And? These are private companies. They have the choice to allow and not allow content on their private platforms. Do you want the US government to step in and disallow Meta from doing this? How would that even work with a Chinese company like Tik Tok? I mean you need to look at what they allow. They allow false propaganda on Meta all the time and do nothing about it. They literally allow videos of black people getting murdered or decapitated on Facebook and countless footage of dead Palestinian children and people being bombed to death can be seen on Instagram with that stupid warning / but remove some right wing social media troll because of complaints? Its about the priorities i guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorNation Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 (edited) 6 minutes ago, cockatoo said: bIg tEcH SiLeNcInG vIeWs the views in question being a human trafficker who was indoctrinating young boys into misogyny and normalising grooming and sexual assault exactly this. free speech is great and all but that doesn’t literally mean you can say whatever the **** you want with no consequences, especially on a platform full of dumdumbs that will believe what you say is true look at France and the US for example. both are free speech countries, but one has laws and protections in place to make sure minorities, LGBTs, people of all races, religion, etc are protected. I’ll let you guess which one it is. Edited August 19, 2022 by TaylorNation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KatyPrismSpirit Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 1 minute ago, krustysalt said: mocking victims of sexual violence is literally against Facebook's rules i know his mocking is against rules. He said a lot of Islamophobic stuff too. Saying ISIS fighters are 'actual muslims' and stuff. To me its an obvious troll spewing lies about himself to sell whatever product. Im happy with his ban in a way but i dont know if deleting someone from the biggest technological innovation of the century is the right way to do it. Why not just remove the content that is against the rules? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wehan6 Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 libs of tik tok next Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krustysalt Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 1 minute ago, KatyPrismSpirit said: i know his mocking is against rules. He said a lot of Islamophobic stuff too. Saying ISIS fighters are 'actual muslims' and stuff. To me its an obvious troll spewing lies about himself to sell whatever product. Im happy with his ban in a way but i dont know if deleting someone from the biggest technological innovation of the century is the right way to do it. Why not just remove the content that is against the rules? De-platforming them is the right way to do especially for someone who's done it multiple times and influencing people. He's not just an everyday Facebook or tiktok user who made a single comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XAMJ Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 1 minute ago, wehan6 said: libs of tik tok next oh my god, PLEASE they are scum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shelter Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 Good. His views are just not good to be spreading, dumb teens looking up to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teen Idle Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 I've never heard of this man before in my life and I think that's probably a good thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contessa Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 Who Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryoncé Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 16 minutes ago, KatyPrismSpirit said: i know his mocking is against rules. He said a lot of Islamophobic stuff too. Saying ISIS fighters are 'actual muslims' and stuff. To me its an obvious troll spewing lies about himself to sell whatever product. Im happy with his ban in a way but i dont know if deleting someone from the biggest technological innovation of the century is the right way to do it. Why not just remove the content that is against the rules? Having a platform or social media account is a privilege, not a right and not something anyone is entitled to. The silencing of his repulsive, disgusting man is not something we should feel any sympathy towards or frustration about. If you are concerned about anything, it should be those harmed by the inflammatory rhetoric he has spread that has helped lead people to acting out real violence and hate crimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryoncé Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 30 minutes ago, cyclone said: This is disturbing and sets a precedent, we shouldn't allow big tech to have total control over silencing people like this. @cyclone is this you officially saying you are a supporter of his homophobic, racist, vile human and believe he deserves a platform to spread these dangerous ideals. If so, I think it's best you leave ATRL because there is no place for vulgar ideals like the ones Andrew Tate shares on this site. Absolutely disgusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McNulty Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raver Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 30 minutes ago, wehan6 said: libs of tik tok next Libs of TikTok having atrl PRESSED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
getBusy Posted August 19, 2022 Share Posted August 19, 2022 44 minutes ago, KatyPrismSpirit said: big tech is... silencing those with opposing views. "opposing views" LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts