discussion Do you believe in the Clinton Body Count?

[Gorgeous]

At first it seemed like a paranoid conspiracy theory from the Qs, but then evidence started showing up... do you believe in it? 

 

 

 

Edit: 

 

Quote

The Clinton Body Count is a conspiracy theory asserting that former U.S. President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary Clinton have had people assassinated, totaling as many as 50 or more.

 

Such accusations have been around at least since the 1990s, when a film called The Clinton Chronicles, produced by Larry Nicholsand promoted by Rev. Jerry Falwell, accused Bill Clinton of multiple crimes including murder.

 

Edited August 7, 2022 by Gorgeous

[Miss Show Business]

Please share what "evidence" "showed up"?

 

The idea that the Clinton's can kill their adversaries quietly... When Bill couldn't get a BJ in the oval without the entire world knowing... Is pure ridiculousness.

[Sesame]

Idk you didn’t post what it is so 

[americanlife]

I came for the other kind of body count.

 

[blueberries]

is she a h0 ?

[Luckitty]

not the sl*t shaming 

[Gorgeous]

5 minutes ago, Miss Show Business said:

Please share what "evidence" "showed up"?

 

The idea that the Clinton's can kill their adversaries quietly... When Bill couldn't get a BJ in the oval without the entire world knowing... Is pure ridiculousness.

do you really believe Epstein hanged himself on suicide watch? 

 

3 minutes ago, blueberries said:

is she a h0 ?

LAMFAOO 

[Miss Show Business]

1 minute ago, Gorgeous said:

do you really believe Epstein hanged himself on suicide watch? 

And what does this have to do with the topic you created? 

[Beyonnaise]

Vince Foster's death is fishy but it makes me uncomfy how that conspiracy is touted by the same people who believe in QAnon

[stjosephprey4us]

I came here expecting to see how many ppl Bill has had sex w 

[Smarticle]

How many people did she have sex with?

[Jotham]

Some of y'all need to take a break from the Internet.

[mercurialworld]

4 minutes ago, stjosephprey4us said:

I came here expecting to see how many ppl Bill has had sex w 

 

same

[ryoncé]

if your gonna post this, at least explain what you mean....

 

does that tweet have to do something with bill's sex life or

[Аshanti]

19 minutes ago, stjosephprey4us said:

I came here expecting to see how many ppl Bill has had sex w 

Underaged or not?

[Gorgeous]

Just now, Аshanti said:

Underaged or not?

 

 

 

[Breathe On Moi]

she’s a top on grindr confirmed 

[Moloko Plus]

https://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/THE CLINTON BODY COUNT.pdf

 

[EtherealCat]

yes to the murders and the being sluts 

[Moloko Plus]

51 minutes ago, Miss Show Business said:

Please share what "evidence" "showed up"?

 

The idea that the Clinton's can kill their adversaries quietly... When Bill couldn't get a BJ in the oval without the entire world knowing... Is pure ridiculousness.

Evidence has been linked! Get into it!

 

[Miss Show Business]

7 minutes ago, Moloko Plus said:

Evidence has been linked! Get into it!

 

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/clinton-body-bags/

 

Unfortunately, facts trump conspiracy theories.

Spoiler

“Body count” lists are not a new phenomenon. Lists documenting all the allegedly “suspicious” deaths of persons connected with the assassination of John F. Kennedy have been circulating for decades, and the same techniques used to create and spread the JFK lists have been employed in the Clinton version:

 

• List every dead person with even the most tenuous of connections to your subject. It doesn’t matter how these people died, or how tangential they were to your subject’s life. The longer the list, the more impressive it looks and the less likely anyone will be to challenge it. By the time readers get to the bottom of the list, they’ll be too weary to wonder what could possibly be relevant about the death of people such as Bill Clinton’s mother’s chiropractor.

 

• Play word games. Make sure every death is presented as “mysterious.” All accidental deaths are to be labelled “suspicious,” even though by definition accidents occur when something unexpected goes wrong. Every self-inflicted death discussed must include the phrase “ruled a suicide” to imply just the opposite. When an autopsy contradicts a “mysterious death” theory, dispute it; when none was performed because none was needed, claim that “no autopsy was allowed.” Make liberal use of words such as ‘allegedly’ and ‘supposedly’ to dismiss facts you can’t support or contradict with hard evidence.

 

• Make sure every inconsistency or unexplained detail you can dredge up is offered as evidence of a conspiracy, no matter how insignificant or pointless it may be. If an obvious suicide is discovered wearing only one shoe, ignore the physical evidence of self-inflicted death and dwell on the missing shoe. You don’t have to establish an alternate theory of the death; just keep harping that the missing shoe “can’t be explained.”

 

• If the data doesn’t fit your conclusion, ignore it. You don’t have to explain why the people who claimed to have the most damaging goods on Bill Clinton (e.g., Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Linda Tripp, Monica Lewinsky, Kenneth Starr), walked around unscathed while dozens of bit players were supposedly bumped off. It’s inconvenient for you, so don’t mention it.

Most important, don’t let facts and details stand in your way! If you can pass off a death by pneumonia as a “suicide,” do it! If a cause of death contradicts your conspiracy theory, claim it was “never determined.” If your chronology of events is impossible, who cares? It’s not like anybody is going to check up on this stuff …

 

[Mr.Link]

It is precisely for **** like this why Trump was elected and will be elected again soon. 

[Moloko Plus]

16 minutes ago, Miss Show Business said:

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/clinton-body-bags/

 

Unfortunately, facts trump conspiracy theories.

  Reveal hidden contents

“Body count” lists are not a new phenomenon. Lists documenting all the allegedly “suspicious” deaths of persons connected with the assassination of John F. Kennedy have been circulating for decades, and the same techniques used to create and spread the JFK lists have been employed in the Clinton version:

 

• List every dead person with even the most tenuous of connections to your subject. It doesn’t matter how these people died, or how tangential they were to your subject’s life. The longer the list, the more impressive it looks and the less likely anyone will be to challenge it. By the time readers get to the bottom of the list, they’ll be too weary to wonder what could possibly be relevant about the death of people such as Bill Clinton’s mother’s chiropractor.

 

• Play word games. Make sure every death is presented as “mysterious.” All accidental deaths are to be labelled “suspicious,” even though by definition accidents occur when something unexpected goes wrong. Every self-inflicted death discussed must include the phrase “ruled a suicide” to imply just the opposite. When an autopsy contradicts a “mysterious death” theory, dispute it; when none was performed because none was needed, claim that “no autopsy was allowed.” Make liberal use of words such as ‘allegedly’ and ‘supposedly’ to dismiss facts you can’t support or contradict with hard evidence.

 

• Make sure every inconsistency or unexplained detail you can dredge up is offered as evidence of a conspiracy, no matter how insignificant or pointless it may be. If an obvious suicide is discovered wearing only one shoe, ignore the physical evidence of self-inflicted death and dwell on the missing shoe. You don’t have to establish an alternate theory of the death; just keep harping that the missing shoe “can’t be explained.”

 

• If the data doesn’t fit your conclusion, ignore it. You don’t have to explain why the people who claimed to have the most damaging goods on Bill Clinton (e.g., Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Linda Tripp, Monica Lewinsky, Kenneth Starr), walked around unscathed while dozens of bit players were supposedly bumped off. It’s inconvenient for you, so don’t mention it.

Most important, don’t let facts and details stand in your way! If you can pass off a death by pneumonia as a “suicide,” do it! If a cause of death contradicts your conspiracy theory, claim it was “never determined.” If your chronology of events is impossible, who cares? It’s not like anybody is going to check up on this stuff …

 

Not Snopes lmao

[Taylena]

House of Cards is a documentary about Bill and Hillary Clinton. 

[Miss Show Business]

11 minutes ago, Moloko Plus said:

Not Snopes lmao

Snopes has been debunking myths, urban legends, and conspiracy theories since the 1990s. They're certainly more reliable than any of your "sources"