Jump to content

Gaga confirms Joker role


Recommended Posts

Posted

a musical?

  • Replies 407
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Artur

    11

  • GraceRandolph

    10

  • iStanGaga

    9

  • Bojana

    9

Posted

What is she doing she needs to play Amy winehouse 

 

:jonnycat:

Posted

She's living her dreams :weeps: :heart2:

Posted
5 hours ago, Vin said:

Yeah, this will definitely be critically-PANNED and won't reach the box office gross of the first film.

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

4 things:

 

1. I like Joaquin Phoenix and he should have won an Oscar for "HER," not "JOKER."

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

2. "JOKER" was an overhyped bore—the "folklore" of cinema.

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

3. I find it hypocritical that little monsters are praising this as a "win" for Gaga after little monsters (and this entire forum) called "JOKER" a "film for incels."

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

4. Not to state the obvious, but Gaga is a bad actor, so don't expect an acting nomination for her from The Academy for "JOKER 2." I will say that Gaga's agent is amazing, though. The way Gaga keeps booking high-profile roles with a very limited acting range is incredible— the millennial Gwyneth Paltrow.

 

...Vin

Michael Fassbander is a woman beater

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

Posted

Even if it isn't well received by critics, it's guaranteed to be a huge smash and continue to strengthen her position and legacy as an actress. She's curating herself an iconic lil' filmography.

 

The Snowman, Assassin's Creed, Dark Phoenix and Alien Covenant chanteuse can NOT relate. 

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

Posted
6 hours ago, Vin said:

Yeah, this will definitely be critically-PANNED and won't reach the box office gross of the first film.

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

4 things:

 

1. I like Joaquin Phoenix and he should have won an Oscar for "HER," not "JOKER."

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

2. "JOKER" was an overhyped bore—the "folklore" of cinema.

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

3. I find it hypocritical that little monsters are praising this as a "win" for Gaga after little monsters (and this entire forum) called "JOKER" a "film for incels."

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

4. Not to state the obvious, but Gaga is a bad actor, so don't expect an acting nomination for her from The Academy for "JOKER 2." I will say that Gaga's agent is amazing, though. The way Gaga keeps booking high-profile roles with a very limited acting range is incredible— the millennial Gwyneth Paltrow.

 

...Vin

My God, I have been seeing your posts on here for years and I really have to say something - your opinion is just that - YOURS. It's hilarious how you're always writing the comments as if it's something definitive and always passive aggressive. Can't wait until you're proven wrong yet again - as Gaga's acting wasn't panned, ever. Not in Gucci and definitely not in ASIB.

c

 

 

OT: I wonder if we'll be getting loads of filming pics again

 

Posted
45 minutes ago, DoctorIce said:

Even if it isn't well received by critics, it's guaranteed to be a huge smash and continue to strengthen her position and legacy as an actress. She's curating herself an iconic lil' filmography.

 

The Snowman, Assassin's Creed, Dark Phoenix and Alien Covenant chanteuse can NOT relate. 

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

This is already a cult classic on paper. A rocky horror picture tea.

Box office and acclaim are just a bonus at this point.

Posted

Also can we just remind ourselves, the first one was VERY polarising, you had amazing reviews and absolute horrific reviews hence the 59 on Metacritic and 68 RT (the audience and GP see through critics and obviously loved it!)

Posted (edited)

I wonder if shes going to write a letter herself again 

 

Other than that: Good for Gagz

 

But why the early teaser?

Edited by *-ChriZ-*
Posted

I can already see she's going to kill it. She's perfect for that role. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Vin said:

Yeah, this will definitely be critically-PANNED and won't reach the box office gross of the first film.

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

4 things:

 

1. I like Joaquin Phoenix and he should have won an Oscar for "HER," not "JOKER."

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

2. "JOKER" was an overhyped bore—the "folklore" of cinema.

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

3. I find it hypocritical that little monsters are praising this as a "win" for Gaga after little monsters (and this entire forum) called "JOKER" a "film for incels."

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

4. Not to state the obvious, but Gaga is a bad actor, so don't expect an acting nomination for her from The Academy for "JOKER 2." I will say that Gaga's agent is amazing, though. The way Gaga keeps booking high-profile roles with a very limited acting range is incredible— the millennial Gwyneth Paltrow.

 

...Vin

Who the f called Joker a movie for incels? You're such a weirdo, my god. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Junlin said:

Since ga ga is known as Jester of Pop, she’s actually perfect for this :clap3:

Omg yes she called herself a Devoted Jester almost 13 years ago :clap3:so impressed u catched that, loyal fan :clap3:

 

Posted

Hopefully this is better than the first film. That **** put me to sleep lol

Posted

she's actually perfect for this role, I am excited 

Posted

Between the obsessed k-pop stan with 20 posts in here and the 40 year old weirdo spamming gifs to make a nonexistent point… a nurse is NEEDED.

 

spacer.png

Posted

The theater showings for this will be split between incels and bottoms 

Posted

:ahh:

Her getting these huge LEAD roles based on her proven acting ability and not just because of her name.

The other girls are being handed crumbs via cameos and side characters while Gaga is snatching up LEADING LADY titles. :ahh:

The stans are mad because this is the thing that only Gaga is able to do. Her contemporaries have tried time and time again to land big leading roles and they can't because no movie studio trusts them with such a momentous task.

 

This is going to be huge for her continued legacy in film. Her box office gross as a leading lady could very well shoot past $1b with this (and she didn't have to hop on an animated film as a secondary character to do it).

Posted
15 minutes ago, Badgalbriel said:

Yes, general people said it was a movie for incels. He is saying that monsters are the ones who came up with it. 

I hate that I'm defending them but they didn't say that, they said this forum, including monsters, called the movie a film for incels. Which honestly is mostly true, but it irrelevant at this point. And again, that user sucks.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Hurem said:

He said Liddos (and ATRL) called it an incel movie :rip: 

...this is true though :gaycat6:

Posted
6 minutes ago, Headlock said:

...this is true though :gaycat6:

This is far from the truth. This is not the type of forum that would even pay attention to this movie before it being released to even say it is an incel movie. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, Headlock said:

...this is true though :gaycat6:

Why would you post bunch of media articles as proof of Liddos calling it an incel movie? :rip: I don’t remember us calling it that, but work.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.