Jump to content

Gaga confirms Joker role


Recommended Posts

Posted
36 minutes ago, fauxtography said:

Weren't you perma'd? How did you weasel your way back here after accusing Gaga of stealing her dogs and shooting her dog walker?

 

araragi.thumb.gif.d322d3261cb612b6600829

 

 

 

 

I-

 

ohmygod-disgusted.gif

  • Replies 407
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Artur

    11

  • GraceRandolph

    10

  • iStanGaga

    9

  • Bojana

    9

Posted

Since ga ga is known as Jester of Pop, she’s actually perfect for this :clap3:

Posted

Yeah, this will definitely be critically-PANNED and won't reach the box office gross of the first film.

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

4 things:

 

1. I like Joaquin Phoenix and he should have won an Oscar for "HER," not "JOKER."

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

2. "JOKER" was an overhyped bore—the "folklore" of cinema.

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

3. I find it hypocritical that little monsters are praising this as a "win" for Gaga after little monsters (and this entire forum) called "JOKER" a "film for incels."

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

4. Not to state the obvious, but Gaga is a bad actor, so don't expect an acting nomination for her from The Academy for "JOKER 2." I will say that Gaga's agent is amazing, though. The way Gaga keeps booking high-profile roles with a very limited acting range is incredible— the millennial Gwyneth Paltrow.

 

...Vin

Posted
38 minutes ago, fauxtography said:

Weren't you perma'd? How did you weasel your way back here after accusing Gaga of stealing her dogs and shooting her dog walker?

 

araragi.thumb.gif.d322d3261cb612b6600829

 

 

 

 

:rip: 

 

She really should study OGH to prepare for this role

 

ezgif-2-c76e74ae6c.thumb.gif.08747ce1a8e

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, State of Grace. said:

:rip: 

 

She really should study OGH to prepare for this role

 

ezgif-2-c76e74ae6c.thumb.gif.08747ce1a8e

Jjoker 2: Folie a Deux 

Edited by GraceRandolph
Posted
1 minute ago, Vin said:

Yeah, this will definitely be critically-PANNED and won't reach the box office gross of the first film.

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

4 things:

 

1. I like Joaquin Phoenix and he should have won an Oscar for "HER," not "JOKER."

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

2. "JOKER" was an overhyped bore—the "folklore" of cinema.

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

3. I find it hypocritical that little monsters are praising this as a "win" for Gaga after little monsters (and this entire forum) called "JOKER" a "film for incels."

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

4. Not to state the obvious, but Gaga is a bad actor, so don't expect an acting nomination for her from The Academy for "JOKER 2." I will say that Gaga's agent is amazing, though. The way Gaga keeps booking high-profile roles with a very limited acting range is incredible— the millennial Gwyneth Paltrow.

 

...Vin

Michael Fassbender is a woman beater and a bad actor. No amount of meltdowns and essays will change that

 

...SOG

 

ezgif-2-c76e74ae6c.thumb.gif.08747ce1a8e

 

Just now, GraceRandolph said:

Jjoker 2: Folie a Deux 

:bibliahh:

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Vin said:

Yeah, this will definitely be critically-PANNED and won't reach the box office gross of the first film.

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

4 things:

 

1. I like Joaquin Phoenix and he should have won an Oscar for "HER," not "JOKER."

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

2. "JOKER" was an overhyped bore—the "folklore" of cinema.

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

3. I find it hypocritical that little monsters are praising this as a "win" for Gaga after little monsters (and this entire forum) called "JOKER" a "film for incels."

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

4. Not to state the obvious, but Gaga is a bad actor, so don't expect an acting nomination for her from The Academy for "JOKER 2." I will say that Gaga's agent is amazing, though. The way Gaga keeps booking high-profile roles with a very limited acting range is incredible— the millennial Gwyneth Paltrow.

 

...Vin

You stan for Double Razzie winner (for her only movie) Britney Spears as well as Kesha (who, to quote Rolling Stone, was "allowed to exist because of Lady Gaga"). On top of that, Michael Fassbender is THE biggest box office poison of our generation, bar none. Know your place and spare us the pretentious, poorly-worded analysis.


ezgif-2-c76e74ae6c.thumb.gif.08747ce1a8e 

Edited by perfillusion
Posted (edited)

Delicious fumes already, and we're still 2 years away from the movie... :ahh:

 

ezgif-2-c76e74ae6c.thumb.gif.08747ce1a8eezgif-2-c76e74ae6c.thumb.gif.08747ce1a8eezgif-2-c76e74ae6c.thumb.gif.08747ce1a8eezgif-2-c76e74ae6c.thumb.gif.08747ce1a8eezgif-2-c76e74ae6c.thumb.gif.08747ce1a8e

Edited by Ethereaaal
Posted

Michael Fassbender? Haven’t heard of him since X-Men. I wonder what he’s up to these days 

 

OT: Gaga stays winning :clap3:

Posted
25 minutes ago, Vin said:

Yeah, this will definitely be critically-PANNED and won't reach the box office gross of the first film.

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

4 things:

 

1. I like Joaquin Phoenix and he should have won an Oscar for "HER," not "JOKER."

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

2. "JOKER" was an overhyped bore—the "folklore" of cinema.

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

3. I find it hypocritical that little monsters are praising this as a "win" for Gaga after little monsters (and this entire forum) called "JOKER" a "film for incels."

 

tumblr_o3k6q9NEPC1ruvpwjo2_400.gif

 

4. Not to state the obvious, but Gaga is a bad actor, so don't expect an acting nomination for her from The Academy for "JOKER 2." I will say that Gaga's agent is amazing, though. The way Gaga keeps booking high-profile roles with a very limited acting range is incredible— the millennial Gwyneth Paltrow.

 

...Vin

Before I laugh at your actual post, can I talk about the way you "signed" your post with your username like you're a big shot celebrity, that is hilarious:dies:

 

You clearly don't know how Oscars works.

Joker was never hyped in the beginning, it got less than 100 million opening but stayed there because of WOM, same for international markets.

Joker is a divisive film so there are different opinions about it in little monster community, your generalization is clearly bias.

She gets universal praise in every movie she is in.

Posted

not ppl saying Gaga was panned in House of Gucci when she was literally nominated for almost every relevant and major critic awards except for the Oscars :rip: 

Posted

Gaga was nominated for a SAG and BAFTA for House of Gucci, she was probably #6 for the Oscars. It's not as if she was panned and Razzie nominated. :rip: 

 

Also she already has a Lead Actress Oscar nomination, lest we forget.

 

Literally her first two leading lady roles in films have resulted in critical praise and a boatload of major nominations each. And both films were box office hits. She could not have asked for a better start to her acting career. Joker 2 will be a pop culture moment just like the first and this guarantees she will continue to be highly visible. There is no way to rationalize her acting career thus far as anything but a win. If there is any downside it's that it should've started sooner because she's too old for most ingenue roles now, but she will probably have a chokehold on the femme fatale esque roles from now on. Could easily see her starring in the next Tarantino film. Tom Cruise is also stanning her (as most homosexuals do) and it's not inconceivable he could try to make a star vehicle for both of them.

 

At any rate she will have scripts flying her way, because unlike Margot Robbie, Ana de Armas or Florence Pugh she can actually draw attention to a project with her name alone and put butts in seats. Audiences are over cookie cutter pretty people Hwood stars, just wait and see how hard Barbie, Don't Worry Darling and Blonde will bomb. People want real star power and mystique now and Gaga has both in spades despite not looking like your typical movie star. It also goes without saying that the upcoming Cleopatra movie with Gal Gadot will be a panned disaster because that woman could not act her way out of a paper bag and Gaga in the role would be infinitely more interesting and probably more successful at the box office. Considering it seems to be stuck in development hell maybe there's still a chance Gadot will Beanie Feldstein'd out of the role. Nobody wants to invest $200M into a film with a star who cannot act and whose only hit franchise has already dwindled into HBO Max irrelevancy.

Posted
1 hour ago, perfillusion said:

You stan for Double Razzie winner (for her only movie) Britney Spears as well as Kesha (who, to quote Rolling Stone, was "allowed to exist because of Lady Gaga"). On top of that, Michael Fassbender is THE biggest box office poison of our generation, bar none. Know your place and spare us the pretentious, poorly-worded analysis.


ezgif-2-c76e74ae6c.thumb.gif.08747ce1a8e 

i  -

 

ezgif-2-c76e74ae6c.thumb.gif.08747ce1a8e

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Digitalism said:

HOG all over again

Years of the monsters talking about just to be panned 

Years of you being pressed af we love to see it :bibliahh:

OT: Yes Gaga Yes acclaimed blockbuster :clownny:

Posted

yes actressGa is back again not the fumes and saying HOG was panned like...she was nominated in every award even the GP was surprised she wasnt nominated at the oscars . anyway can't wait

Posted

Not J:FAD being the acronym :rip: the jokes write themselves :bibliahh:

 

anyway, I'm perched!

Posted
2 hours ago, Digitalism said:

HOG all over again

Years of the monsters talking about just to be panned 

Maybe if you say it enough it will happen! :duca:

Posted

I hope we are still all alive then coz chile, we don't know what's gonna happen to this planet in 2 years. :biblio:

 

Congrats, Queen. Well deserved! :clap3:

Posted
1 hour ago, GipJo said:

Before I laugh at your actual post, can I talk about the way you "signed" your post with your username like you're a big shot celebrity, that is hilarious:dies:

I was cringing so hard reading that, anyway I'm intrigued by this movie. Gaga is turning into a real movie star. 

Posted

OGHs never learn. :biblio:

 

Y'all said ASIB was going to be a panned bombed mess yet it did the opposite and now you are saying the same thing to JFAD. :bibliahh:

Posted
42 minutes ago, Witnessuss said:

Not J:FAD being the acronym :rip: the jokes write themselves :bibliahh:

 

anyway, I'm perched!

She’s never beating the allegations.

Posted

This ****ing thread :skull: Anyway, VERY excited for this!!!

Posted

Although I didn’t really like her acting in the Gucci movie Im excited about this one. Come through Gaga

 

Posted

I hate musicals but i love gaga

Posted
2 hours ago, Protocol said:

Gaga was nominated for a SAG and BAFTA for House of Gucci, she was probably #6 for the Oscars. It's not as if she was panned and Razzie nominated. :rip: 

 

Also she already has a Lead Actress Oscar nomination, lest we forget.

 

Literally her first two leading lady roles in films have resulted in critical praise and a boatload of major nominations each. And both films were box office hits. She could not have asked for a better start to her acting career. Joker 2 will be a pop culture moment just like the first and this guarantees she will continue to be highly visible. There is no way to rationalize her acting career thus far as anything but a win. If there is any downside it's that it should've started sooner because she's too old for most ingenue roles now, but she will probably have a chokehold on the femme fatale esque roles from now on. Could easily see her starring in the next Tarantino film. Tom Cruise is also stanning her (as most homosexuals do) and it's not inconceivable he could try to make a star vehicle for both of them.

 

At any rate she will have scripts flying her way, because unlike Margot Robbie, Ana de Armas or Florence Pugh she can actually draw attention to a project with her name alone and put butts in seats. Audiences are over cookie cutter pretty people Hwood stars, just wait and see how hard Barbie, Don't Worry Darling and Blonde will bomb. People want real star power and mystique now and Gaga has both in spades despite not looking like your typical movie star. It also goes without saying that the upcoming Cleopatra movie with Gal Gadot will be a panned disaster because that woman could not act her way out of a paper bag and Gaga in the role would be infinitely more interesting and probably more successful at the box office. Considering it seems to be stuck in development hell maybe there's still a chance Gadot will Beanie Feldstein'd out of the role. Nobody wants to invest $200M into a film with a star who cannot act and whose only hit franchise has already dwindled into HBO Max irrelevancy.

Now sis... :toofunny3:

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.