Jump to content

Are these types of gay adult movies recreating pedophilia?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Lately I have been encountering videos that disturb me so much. I'm talking about stuff like mormon boys and step-son themed movies. There's literally categories of gay adult movies labeled after the 'teen' tag or 'young twink', where usually the submissive actor resembles a pre-pubescent boy. I'm not kidding when I say that you couldn't tell if the kid was taken straight from a high school hall or not. I'm sure they must be over 18+, but the set up and physical traits of the actors are obviously amplified to look -18 (low calorie, kids clothing, high pitch voice, fully shaved, etc.). Why does the gay community feel okay with these stuff on adult sites? Most videos have hundreds of thousands plays... 

 

*I'm not saying that straight adult movies don't also do this*** 

 

 

08d4384826624b3d4806ac59e85b553e.3.jpg 

23b299ca3d2c23ba312c193d99e6cd50.9.jpg 

a0a36f1a8ac4f792011346657b270f1d6.mp4-fu 

[spoiler/]

 

 

Also I'm posting this in the lounge since this is not supposed to be hornee talk 

Edited by Gorgeous

Posted

I am even more disturbed with also the straight ones, son and siblings or parents, literally they celebrate incest, sex with the underage and teachers with students. Porn is the pits in itself. So no surprise on what both straight and gay porn content is made. 

Posted

It’s even worse with straights. :deadvision:

Posted

This is not only a thing in gay adult videos though? Youth has always been fetishized. I think calling these pedo fuel is harsh though, most of the actors are clearly of age, and many people have kinks around power dynamics (doctor & patient, father & son, or enjoy size comparisons between a small guy and a larger guy) without having any interest in underage guys. 

Posted

straight porn has this as well. girls are dressed up in mini skirts and pigtails, and their eyes widen when they see their "first big c**k!" its so dumb.

Posted

As long as they are all 18+ I don't see any problem with it. An 18 yr old can f*ck anyone from 18 to 99

Posted

Yes, gay adult movies can be disturbing and disgusting, but let's not pretend straight porn movies don't do the same thing :mazen:

Posted
2 minutes ago, GraceRandolph said:

This is not only a thing in gay adult videos though? Youth has always been fetishized. I think calling these pedo fuel is harsh though, most of the actors are clearly of age, and many people have kinks around power dynamics (doctor & patient, father & son, or enjoy size comparisons between a small guy and a larger guy) without having any interest in underage guys. 

This. Not to mention that pedophilia is attraction to prepubescent children, not fully developed adults. It's the power dynamic that gets people.

Posted
1 minute ago, Mohit said:

As long as they are all 18+ I don't see any problem with it. An 18 yr old can f*ck anyone from 18 to 99

Honestly, there is some internalized homophobia in this thread. How is it pedophilia to be turned on by 18-21 year old guys? For a lot of us we are in that age range, and many guys are turned on by twink body types. Tbh, it’s okay that different body types are celebrated. 

 

Just now, The Next Day said:

This. Not to mention that pedophilia is attraction to prepubescent children, not fully developed adults. It's the power dynamic that gets people.

Yep, although that guy in the first pic does look very young, but some guys just have a youthful appearance even into their late twenties. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Mohit said:

As long as they are all 18+ I don't see any problem with it. An 18 yr old can f*ck anyone from 18 to 99

but the +18yo have been basically disguised to look 14-16, not many 18 look small and pre-pubescent as these 

Posted

str8 porn is worse especially studios like PureTaboo 

Posted

Straight porn has been doing the same thing for a much longer time, but it's true that the whole industry has pivoted to incest-adjacent scenarios in the last decade or so. Supply and demand, I guess.

Posted

Yes, but it doesn't matter, Legrand Wolf and Bishop Angus can get it :gaycat2:

Posted

these people look over 25 

23b299ca3d2c23ba312c193d99e6cd50.9.jpg

a0a36f1a8ac4f792011346657b270f1d6.mp4-fu

 

Posted

What is pedophilia: an attraction to children

 

What is not pedophilia: an attraction to young adults.

 

hope this could clear that up!

Posted

That Legrand Wolf guy.

 

:rip:

 

Jeez.

Posted

Straight porn is worse. They literally have girls talk as baby girls do...

Posted

Some people would not really consider this "pedophilia" but when you have the "bottom" that actually looks like they're literally going through puberty, then it kinda like's eh.....

 

It also doesn't help when the scenery is also designed to make it seem that way with things such as teddy bears, pajamas, and basically the whole scene looks kinda pedo ish.

Posted

As someone who tends to be very social-justice-y on this site, I actually don't have a problem with these videos, and let me tell you why: 

 

1. As you pointed out, these actors are 18+. As far as I'm aware, all actors/staff involved consented to the production of these videos. 

 

2. The word "pedo" gets thrown out way too much on this site. Pedophilia is obviously disgusting and the predator should absolutely face jail time and be put on a sex offender list, but if two consenting adults are involved in porn that both adults consented to, that's not pedophilia. It's not promoting pedophilia, because it's not pedophilia. 

 

3. When I was in my younger years, I definitely slept with "daddies," and I got off on that. I don't regret those sexual experiences, nor was I traumatized by them, because I consented, and it was what I wanted at the time. I also had the common sense to know these sexual experiences would not lead to something more substantial, nor did I want them to. And no, I didn't have daddy issues, and I still don't. I have a great relationship with my dad.

 

4. Everyone has kinks, and not everyone's kinks are going to make you comfortable, and that's perfectly acceptable. As long as someone's kink does not involve minors, violence (not talking BDSM, I'm talking about someone getting physically hurt during sex), or lack of consent, who are we to really judge? 

 

I get being uncomfortable by certain kinks, and I'm sorry you genuinely felt uncomfortable by this content. At least you now know which content to avoid, so you can consume content that is more suitable for your entertainment. 

Posted
25 minutes ago, Mohit said:

As long as they are all 18+ I don't see any problem with it. An 18 yr old can f*ck anyone from 18 to 99

The problem is the people who watch them. They're internalizing a fetish towards prepubescent boys which with time literally just turns into pedophelia.

Posted (edited)

stop watching corn. its damaging your brain even more than atrl

Edited by KatyPrismSpirit
Posted

Straight p0rn is way worse PLUS these descriptions don't fit the definition of pedophilia which is the sexual desire of 13 year old and younger. This is Ephebophilia (between 15 and 19)

 

Still weird for grown ass men to be into teenies imo.

Posted
19 minutes ago, zasderfght said:

As you pointed out, these actors are 18+

yes but they are suggesting that they are younger, some of them even wear little kids underwear... 

 

 

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, zasderfght said:

 

4. Everyone has kinks

 

if your kink is pegging someone who portrays themselves as a literal child during s*x**l practices you are literally on your way to distinct pedophilia and need help....

Edited by KatyPrismSpirit
Posted
2 minutes ago, Gorgeous said:

yes but they are suggesting that they are younger, some of them even wear little kids underwear... 

 

 

Do you think that pup play will lead people to develop a desire for bestiality? This is not how this works. 

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.