Jump to content

Beyoncé has six multiweeks number ones, why?


PrudenceHCharmed

Recommended Posts

• Crazy In Love (8 Weeks)

• Baby Boy (9 Weeks)

• Check On It (5 Weeks)

• Irreplaceable (10 Weeks)

• Single Ladies (4 Weeks)

• Perfect (5 Weeks)

 

Despite being a laughing stock on the Hot 100, the former Female of The Decade tally a total of 41 Weeks at #1, why? Particularly in 2008/9, the Hot 100 was packed with many releases and competition but the Queen B strived and lasted for 4 weeks at the top with Single Ladies. Nowadays, we have many singles spending a week at the top. So ATRL, why is Beyoncé doing something that is difficult to get, that not everybody can have?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

okay. so what now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perfect was sketchy though. The first week Beyonce deserved credit, but I remember people calculated some of her other credited weeks, and the remix didn’t actually have the most points, but she was credited anyway. Billboard hasn’t always been consistent when it’s come to how they credit remixes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The fact that she had 2 massive #1s from her debut era that took 17 weeks at the top alone is insane :jonnycat:

I'm still shook Baby Boy had a longer #1 run than Crazy In Love's run at #1 - DIL was sooo massive 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talent :clap3:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because she just does

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beyoncé is a great seller, the narrative she doesn't have hits after the IASF era comes from people who are too obsessed with raw numbers, they would be shocked some classics didn't even made into the Top 40.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh baby boy.. Now that's a nasty bop

 

 

I'm stepping in hotter this year
I'm stepping in hotter this year
So don't you fight it
So don't you fight it

 

AltruisticSingleLamprey-size_restricted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, gustavothehuman said:

Beyoncé is a great seller, the narrative she doesn't have hits after the IASF era comes from people who are too obsessed with raw numbers, they would be shocked some classics didn't even made into the Top 40.

this :clap3:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, naval23 said:

The fact that she had 2 massive #1s from her debut era that took 17 weeks at the top alone is insane :jonnycat:

I'm still shook Baby Boy had a longer #1 run than Crazy In Love's run at #1 - DIL was sooo massive 

Her record label paid for their airplay and the Hot 100 was entirely airplay fueled at the time. It’s not that insane.

 

Still, Baby Boy deserved a million weeks at #1 :clap3: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of them from 2 decades ago (w/ the exception of Perfect thanks to Ed) :deadbanana: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Eternium said:

Her record label paid for their airplay and the Hot 100 was entirely airplay fueled at the time. It’s not that insane.

 

Still, Baby Boy deserved a million weeks at #1 :clap3: 

This might be true but Crazy In Love went on to become one of the most well known classics with over 1M sold in the UK and over 2M in the US. Currently, CIL had over a billion streams combined on YT and Spotify! 

 

Baby Boy was doing moderate but it has almost 200M streams on Spotify. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you actually care about an answer, there it is:

 

Most of her hit were in the era when radio were 100% of the points toward the hot 100.

 

If you’ve ever looked at the radio chart, you’d know it works like peer pressure.

Once a song hit #1, every other radio start playing it to overkill.


Most radio #1s are multi week #1s.

 

Vs the 1980s or 2010s where sales and big release week allowed for more rotation on the charts and much shorter runs at #1.

 

SL was a mega hit as big as CIL & bigger than Irreplaceable in the US with with the change in chart method the run at #1 was still much shorter.

Edited by frenchyisback
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • ATRL Moderator
2 hours ago, PrudenceHCharmed said:

Nowadays, we have many singles spending a week at the top. So ATRL, why is Beyoncé doing something that is difficult to get

This seems a little disingenuous. Since last fall:

 

Easy On Me - 10 weeks

As It Was - 8 weeks

Stay - 7 weeks

We Don't Talk About Bruno - 5 weeks

First Class - 3 weeks

 

And of course Heat Waves broke the record for longest climb to #1, so it wasn't some cute little hit with no longevity.

 

Sure, we occasionally get one of those one-week #1s, but it's not like it's every week when there are a lot of songs claiming #1 for over a month (or two).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.