Jump to content

Jack Harlow's album panned by Pitchfork (2.9/10), exposes his chin implant


GentleDance

Recommended Posts

Mess.

 

I just know he's going to ruin the White Men Can't Jump reboot :gaycat6:.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • GentleDance

    8

  • Protocol

    4

  • Katamari

    3

  • Devin

    3

Facial hair can add a lot of weight to the bottom of the chin if used deliberately. I do the same with mine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I despise this guy, but how old is he exactly in those "before" pictures? He looks like he's in his teens. Puberty and being Hollywood-fied will obviously make you look different, especially considering the latter is pretty much necessary if you're an entertainer :rip:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "new chin" literally just being a styled beard :deadbanana4: The quote also doesn't allude to surgery

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Chimichanga said:

Lil Nas X would have gotten a 6.8 for an identical album :mandown:

It’s true. The album wasn’t great or anything but it wasn’t as bad as they’re making it out to be. 
 

As for the chin implant…it could just be weight loss but he definitely had something done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Breathe On Moi said:

If he really did get a chin implant the doctor should have done way more tbh 

Girl we don’t want him looking like the crimson chin 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Chimichanga said:

Lil Nas X would have gotten a 6.8 for an identical album :mandown:

Tea though :coffee2: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an implant

24 

 

It's facial hair

15

 

 

 

Team chin implant is winning :cm:

 

 

 

Edited by GentleDance
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think he just lost weight and looks better with age. Plus the bear too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chimichanga said:

Lil Nas X would have gotten a 6.8 for an identical album :mandown:

Yup, Pitchfork is notorious for picking and choosing which artists they want to consistently rally behind or tear down. That said, the album is still bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"one-trick pony without a discernible trick"

 

ahh they were in their qwerty BAG truly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s just facial hair.

 

But even if it isn’t, there’s nothing wrong with getting some work done if you can afford it.

 

Album is bad; but should of had a higher score.

Edited by Anomaly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chimichanga said:

Lil Nas X would have gotten a 6.8 for an identical album :mandown:

Or a 7.1. :mandown:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chimichanga said:

Lil Nas X would have gotten a 6.8 for an identical album :mandown:

And thank god he didn't and he actually released much better album than this :mandown:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

brings a whole new meaning to "i didn't peak in high school, i'm out here getting cuter"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah it’s an implant, i’m screaming at pitchfork mentioning this though :rip:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not a chin implant, that's facial hair... you low-test homos, I swear :bibliahh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, justinxx said:

brings a whole new meaning to "i didn't peak in high school, i'm out here getting cuter"

no wonder the rapidly-aging, pushing 30, over-the-hill twinks ITT are living for his bad reviews :thing:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm kind of obsessed with the new chin ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.