Jump to content

Lili Reinhart drags Kim K. Calls her st*pid and harmful


Recommended Posts

Posted

Why does anyone care this much. Its her body & her choice to diet. We’re not calling out celebs that binge eat :michael:

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Archetype

    4

  • Gui Blackout

    3

  • oilheiress

    3

  • unclefloprry

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

She’s :clap3: right :clap3: and :clap3: she :clap3: should :clap3: say :clap3: it :clap3:

Posted

I mean she's right, nothing wrong said here.

Posted

:clap3:

Posted

She’s right. So many are already asking what her secret is so they can do it themselves. Everyone’s bodies are different, and should be treated as such with appropriate weight loss plans. 

 

Not to say Kim can’t do what she wants with her body, but there was no reason to put out the weight part to the world. 

Posted

I had to search her name :rip:

Posted
10 hours ago, Archetype said:

Unlike normal dresses, this one could not be altered as it is from an archive and part of history.  If she wanted to fit into it, she knew what needed to be done, and she succeeded.  She even said she was going to eat a bunch of donuts afterwards now that she won't need to wear it ever again.  It was entirely her choice.  I agree with Lili but let's not act like she doesn't diet or monitor her eating to fit into the outfits she wears to premiers and such.  How are you going to condemn one person for basically doing the same thing you do, except they weren't afraid to admit it?

:clap3:

Posted

Drag ha!

Posted

queen of riverdale snapped!

Posted
9 hours ago, dirrtydiana said:

Which begs the question, what business did Kim have wearing it?? :deadbanana:

It was two different replicas of the original dress. Also, Marilyn had to be sewn into her dress which was specifically made to fit her body. There’s no way Kim, with her vastly different body structure, would fit. She’s also clearly lying about the amount of weight she lost. 

MadonnasBoyfriend
Posted (edited)

She seems unsupportive of other women. Hope Kim drags her like the girl from will and grace 

Edited by MadonnasBoyfriend
Posted

I'm fine with dragging Kim, but I worry that placing too much emphasis on her as a person being bad or stupid misses the forest for the trees when it comes to beauty standards and body image issues. It's obviously an institutional issue that will continue long past the Kardashian empire's heydays. To be honest it's kind of sad that the woman that is viewed as one of the most beautiful currently alive felt she had to starve herself to fit into a dress from a thinner iconic beauty of the past (who was still seen as very curvy for her time), when she would have gotten plenty of attention if she had just worn another Balenciaga look form fit to her silhouette.

Posted

Is stupid considered an offensive word? Why is it censored? :skull:

Posted
8 hours ago, Archetype said:

Oh she had NONE.  Not only is the dress ugly, but the way she felt the need to wear a piece of history like that is just pointless.  She could have easily had a recreation made by Balenciaga or something perfectly tailored for her body and she wouldn’t have needed to lose a single pound, it probably would have at least matched her skin tone as well.

 

10 hours ago, dirrtydiana said:

Which begs the question, what business did Kim have wearing it?? :deadbanana:

Apparently the dress was too fragile to be worn so Kim only wore it for like 5 minutes for the photoshoot, but had a replica made tailored to her size to wear at the actual event.

--

Lili snapped :clap3: 

Posted (edited)

.

Edited by fagsturbation
Posted (edited)

this discourse is so 2011-2014 lmaoo tired aff. And not everybody suddenly being a Marilyn stan as if they wouldn't have dragged the sh*t out of her if they lived during her prime.. yall would've been the first in line calling her untalented, dumb, a bimbo and a terrible example for young girls :lakitu:

Edited by fagsturbation
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Archetype said:

So one woman admitting to choosing to lose weight for the MET Gala is suddenly worth shaming her for?  As if she was the only person there to make that decision, and that normal people also don't try to lose weight for various healthy reasons?  Are you implying that no one should speak about their personal weight loss journey out of fear of... triggering people?   :deadbanana4:

Ikr they want to denaturalize human interactions so bad and force everyone to be self conscious aff and ridiculously mindful of every word they utter like nah that's not what humans do, humans do be talking about wanting/trying to lose weight, they do use analogies like that, like this is literally how people talk irl, people are problematiC get the f over it. Encouraging everyone to do p*rn online and calling it activism is not harmful to kids but saying you had to lose a bit of weight to fit in a dress is? We have to LOL

Edited by fagsturbation
Posted
27 minutes ago, BGXKB said:

Is stupid considered an offensive word? Why is it censored? :skull:

In ATRL? We don’t know and I don’t want another warning point :-*

Posted
5 hours ago, Gui Blackout said:

Losing weight for health reasons is one thing, losing weight to fit into a dress for a party and talking about it like it was an accomplishment is another very different thing.

Do people not lose weight for a wedding? A quinceñera? A sweet 16? Etc to fit into a specific dress? I don’t see how this is any different. 

Posted
4 hours ago, brainmaniac said:

 

Kim lost the weight in an unhealthy manner though. Its one thing if Lilli reacted like this  if Kim lost the weight at a normal pace, but Kim lost 16 pounds in 3 weeks. Thats like 5 pounds a week. Losing 1-2 pounds a week is what’s recommended, so losing 5 pounds a week is considered way overboard 

Yes it sounds unhealthy, but I’m sure she got an entire team behind to make this happen 

 

But also if someone at this industry had changed the body standards is Kim Kardashian… remember when back in the 2000s it was cool to be super skinny, she & her family at least made curvy body cool

 

 

Also what happens when you get ask to loose weight for a Movie roll?? It happen to a lot of people… like a Christian Bale or Jared Letto 

Posted

ENOUGH with this bullshit ENOUGH UGH I HATE IT HERE. SHE CAN STARVE ALL SHE WANTS

Posted
6 hours ago, Protocol said:

At the end of the day it doesn’t matter because Kim Kardashian, and for that matter all of the Kardashians, have not produced a single item of culture that will last in time. Paris Hilton at least has stars are blind. Kim does not have a single, a movie, anything that in 100 years anyone would want to look at and enjoy. As a result, when the Kardashians stop being attractive, which is the source of their currency, and it will happen before long, they were completely fade out of the public and memory. If we even go one step further, Kim Kardashian doesn’t even have a truly iconic image associated with her that could be exhibited in a gallery or something. This literal Marilyn cosplay is yet another attempt to leech off of a star whose fame was rooted in artistic work, like her Grace Jones Paper magazine rip off cover. She is a vacuum, nothingness, a ghost. Her whole existence is a scam.

 

Marilyn is immortal because of her films. Kim and the rest of these vacuums of human creativity will be utterly forgotten. Obliterated. Mark my words.

whew :jonny:

Posted

What Kim said was horrible and the final product was not worth it 

a dressed that didn't fit the theme and look worse in her than on marilyn while kim promoted eating disorders. A MESS

Posted

well Lilly is totally right

2-E9-FD68-D-3430-423-F-93-A0-3-D55-D7-CD

Posted
2 hours ago, Kool_Aid_King said:

Apparently the dress was too fragile to be worn so Kim only wore it for like 5 minutes for the photoshoot, but had a replica made tailored to her size to wear at the actual event.

She had a replica made tailored for her body?  So she didn’t need to lose weight at all?  Omg  :deadbanana4:

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.