Jump to content

Grace Randolph


Recommended Posts

Posted
32 minutes ago, Arcadius said:

Girl enough :deadbanana2:

 

 

This ***** :ahh: 

  • Replies 8.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Assassin

    980

  • orange22

    435

  • D_Man3379

    381

  • WildAmerican

    376

Posted
35 minutes ago, Arcadius said:

Girl enough :deadbanana2:

 

 

The Bird squawks again 

Posted

Her starting the Black Panther trailer with talking about how there are too many women on the poster :deadbanana4:

not even 30 seconds in and she is wilding about pleasing male viewers.  :hoetenks:

Posted

Omg grace nooo stop. 
:deadbanana2:

Posted

She really needs to drop this “too many women” narrative. :deadbanana2: It’s already old and she keeps pushing it on every single video. 

Posted
6 hours ago, Arcadius said:

Girl enough :deadbanana2:

 

 

Her complaints that the movie is “too female centric” sound very dumb since Namor (a HUGE character) has been heavily featured in almost every piece of promo material that I’ve seen for the movie. 
 

Namor’s inclusion should keep the “Marvel is getting rid of male heroes” fanboys at bay. Shut up, Grace. 

Posted
9 hours ago, GivingCher said:

She just said in today’s live stream that her favorite Taylor songs are The Man and YNTCD… that makes so much sense for her 

:dies:

Posted

The way Birds of Prey sent her off on this path ? but she has a point BP2 Will underperform and The Woman King already did it a few weeks ago.

Posted
9 hours ago, Dark Phoenix said:

The way Birds of Prey sent her off on this path ? but she has a point BP2 Will underperform and The Woman King already did it a few weeks ago.

She’s been on this **** since way before Birds of Prey. 

Posted

Wakanda forever isn’t gonna underperform. Everyone i know has been talking about it non-stop. Don’t be suprise if the opening weekend starts to break records. 

Posted

Yeah If you watch her old videos, she always had this way of thinking when it comes to women in the media/entertainment industry.

Posted

 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, GraceRandolph said:

 

I'm not ready to wacth this. :emofish:

 

"Does the LGBT community deserve more movies? Yes, but take the women out. Where's the testosterone or the easter eggs?" :thing:

Edited by Blade Runner
Posted

 

14 minutes ago, GraceRandolph said:

 

MM is way too late, I’m already past interest in last weeks box office discussion. 

Posted

@Reverse Warholian change the title to Grace Randolph Roasts Billy Eichner's 40 YO White Male Entitlement

Posted

Well, the video was better than expected. Whew... 

Posted
8 minutes ago, D_Man3379 said:

 

 

MM is way too late, I’m already past interest in last weeks box office discussion. 

I don’t care if it’s late… I can read the numbers on my own.. I just like listening to her take on it. Especially for Bros. 

Posted

She really filleted Eichner. I hate to admit it, but her point about critics being afraid to be honest about Bros is pretty on point. I was already feeling a rose-tinted view of Love, Simon from critics as well. It just makes gays look bad.

Posted

Ms Grace said nothing but the truth on this weeks MM

Posted

I’m 12 minutes in and she still hasn’t taken her foot off Billy’s neck :rip:

Posted

She hit the nail on the head about these famous writers in Hollywood who feel as if they should be the star of their own work. It simply does not work for everyone and I can't believe Billy Eichner thought he was popular enough to lead a big theatrical rom-com in 2022. 

Posted (edited)

But wasn't it Grace that said Love, Simon was a box office flop? Wasn't it Grace that said that flop was due to lack of interest in LGBT projects? Didn't she say the same thing about Moonlight and Call Me By Your Name? Why is she backtracking now? 

 

Supporting LGBT characters are much different than LGBT leads. The supporting characters is not who the show is based on. Often times, it is a subplot people can skip over if they want to and it takes nothing from the show. That is completely different from having a straight up and down LGBT show that is predominately LGBT and not having LGBT characters thrown in an otherwise straight world. How many shows and movies like that are actually successful? And then when they are, there are straight actors playing the lead like Heartstoppers, which she quoted. The most important thing of all is, just because a show like Euphoria gets 20 million views with its LGBT themes doesn't mean that 20 million people would show up to the BO opening night if it was a major motion picture. That was the point Billy was trying to make. It doesn't matter who was in the role, most people weren't going to turn up to see it beyond a 15m projection. And I wish people would stop glossing over that and trying to be PC about it. Homophobia is alive and well and has been seeing an uptick due to conservative values slowly but surely coming back. 

 

 

Edited by Cloy
Posted
4 minutes ago, Cloy said:

But wasn't it Grace that said Love, Simon was a box office flop? Wasn't it Grace that said that flop was due to lack of interest in LGBT projects? Didn't she say the same thing about Moonlight and Call Me By Your Name? Why is she backtracking now? 

 

Supporting LGBT characters are much different than LGBT leads. The supporting characters is not who the show is based on. Often times, it is a subplot people can skip over if they want to and it takes nothing from the show. That is completely different from having a straight up and down LGBT show that is predominately LGBT and not having LGBT characters thrown in an otherwise straight world. How many shows and movies like that are actually successful. And then when they are, there are straight actors playing the lead like Heartstoppers, which she quoted. The most important thing of all is, just because a show like Euphoria gets 20 million views with its LGBT themes doesn't mean that 20 million people would show up to the BO opening night if it was a major motion picture. That was the point Billy was trying to make. 

 

 

Homophobia definitely played a role in the flop, but moreso the lack of star power, poor marketing, and romcoms being a streaming genre. It's totally fair for Grace to say that LGBT leads aren't groundbreaking anymore. They just aren't, especially in comedies. The marketing never should've emphasized the groundbreaking nature of Bros, it clearly misfired.

Posted

She was dragging Miss Eichner left and right :psyduck: his Jessica Chastain moment 

 

 

Posted
11 minutes ago, GraceRandolph said:

Homophobia definitely played a role in the flop, but moreso the lack of star power, poor marketing, and romcoms being a streaming genre. It's totally fair for Grace to say that LGBT leads aren't groundbreaking anymore. They just aren't, especially in comedies. The marketing never should've emphasized the groundbreaking nature of Bros, it clearly misfired.

I wrote something and the error got me.

 

Long story short: What LGBT film that wasn't about a specific person opened big at the box office with or without a A-list lead LGBT or not?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.