Jump to content

Billboard: Love Story 10K 1st day, 6.13M copies total


Hector

Recommended Posts

The Sales 'Story' … The new re-recording, which was released on Feb. 12, sold 10,000 downloads in the U.S. that day, according to initial reports to MRC Data.

 

As for the original version of "Love Story," it sold about 200 downloads in the U.S. on Feb. 12. In the week leading up to the release of the re-recording’s release, the original version had been selling a negligible amount on a daily basis. Through Feb. 4, the original "Love Story" had sold 6.13 million downloads in the U.S.

 

And Now, The Radio 'Story' … As for radio airplay in its first day, "Love Story (Taylor's Version)" — which is not being actively promoted to radio stations — drew 144 plays on Feb. 12 on 89 stations that report to Billboard's all-genre, audience-based Radio Songs chart, a sum that translates to 777,000 audience impressions. Leading the way among those 144 plays, 83 were on reporters to the Pop Airplay chart, 34 were on Adult Pop Airplay reporters and 12 were on Country Airplay panelists.

 

 

The new take drew more than twice as many plays as the original on Feb. 12, which logged 67 plays yesterday on Radio Songs reporters. Adult Contemporary chart reporters accounted for 25 of those spins, followed by Country Airplay panelists contributing 12.

While the new version attracted 777,000 in audience impressions on Feb. 12, the original drew 227,000.

 

https://www.billboard.com/articles/business/chart-beat/9526014/taylor-swift-love-story-re-recording-sales-first-day/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10k from downloads alone :clap3::clap3:

 

Now please release it on her website. I don't want to have to buy merch just to buy the song :noparty:

Edited by Meev
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are they gonna count this version together with the OG version or separate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Likingstars said:

Are they gonna count this version together with the OG version or separate?

Re-recordings of older songs or albums are treated separately from their originals, with independent chart histories for each version. Thus, Fearless (Taylor's Version) and "Love Story (Taylor's Version)" will chart separately from Swift's original 2008 recordings of the album and song, respectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Likingstars said:

Are they gonna count this version together with the OG version or separate?

The re-recordings will chart separately to the originals. Unfortunately this means that sales and streams of the originals would not count, and this would disrupt the chart runs of the originals like 1989 and puta

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Hector said:

Re-recordings of older songs or albums are treated separately from their originals, with independent chart histories for each version. Thus, Fearless (Taylor's Version) and "Love Story (Taylor's Version)" will chart separately from Swift's original 2008 recordings of the album and song, respectively.

this makes no sense at all. they are pretty much identical. but they group wildly different remix versions together. make it make sense plz  :deadbanana4:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Badgalbriel said:

I really really hope they count both songs as one song. 

It says right in the article, from Billboard itself.. They’re separate entries :deadbanana:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A #4 peaking song selling 6.13 million copies :clap3: 

I don’t see why they aren’t combining them. They sound identical. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Reputation6754 said:

A #4 peaking song selling 6.13 million copies :clap3: 

I don’t see why they aren’t combining them. They sound identical. 

It's weird because artists have remixed their own song (mariah) and they count as the same do they not? otherwise why would she do thqt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They combine versions on the HOT 100 and just the biggest one is counted, why would they do different this time around? Also remixes are always counted as total sales.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So 1989's chart run is gonna be so butchered :rip: the original will stop charting and it will stop racking in weeks. what a mess :deadbanana4: red and 1989 need to be combined bc those are the only ones that regularly chart, so their chart runs are gonna be split :dancehall2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TheCheetahwings said:

It's weird because artists have remixed their own song (mariah) and they count as the same do they not? otherwise why would she do thqt

Billboard just nit picks what they want. They give featured credits when they want. They aren’t even reliable. 
hopefully she doesn’t re-release 1989 soon. It’ll stop charting since they can’t be combined 

Edited by Reputation6754
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Meev said:

The re-recordings will chart separately to the originals. Unfortunately this means that sales and streams of the originals would not count, and this would disrupt the chart runs of the originals like 1989 and puta

puta had no chance anyways. Poor miss Fearless, RED and 1989. On the bright side this means Taylor could earn up to 13 #1 albums in the next 2 years if she plays her cards right. I know Babs is shaking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ms. Togekiss said:

So 1989's chart run is gonna be so butchered :rip: the original will stop charting and it will stop racking in weeks. what a mess :deadbanana4: red and 1989 need to be combined bc those are the only ones that regularly chart, so their chart runs are gonna be split :dancehall2:

I think they will continue to chart normally. The dumb locals and the fans that prefer the ogs are gonna continue to stream them. Especially if they dont switch them out on curated playlists. 1989 might have 2 versions chart simultaneously forever :emofish:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be better for them to count them as the same version as otherwise she will have an abnormally large ammount of chart entries in the next few years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10k? On the first day? Wtf :deadbanana2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Reputation6754 said:

Billboard just nit picks what they want. They give featured credits when they want. They aren’t even reliable. 
hopefully she doesn’t re-release 1989 soon. It’ll stop charting since they can’t be combined 

 

1 hour ago, Hector said:

Re-recordings of older songs or albums are treated separately from their originals, with independent chart histories for each version. Thus, Fearless (Taylor's Version) and "Love Story (Taylor's Version)" will chart separately from Swift's original 2008 recordings of the album and song, respectively.

boo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So she is gonna collect like 150 new hot100 entries in the next year or so?? 

 

Thats insane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, fridayteenage said:

 

boo.

Billboard can count them separately, but I think Nielson might combine the pure sales together. Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Brando said:

this makes no sense at all. they are pretty much identical. but they group wildly different remix versions together. make it make sense plz  :deadbanana4:

 

4 hours ago, Reputation6754 said:

A #4 peaking song selling 6.13 million copies :clap3: 

I don’t see why they aren’t combining them. They sound identical. 

 

4 hours ago, TheCheetahwings said:

It's weird because artists have remixed their own song (mariah) and they count as the same do they not? otherwise why would she do thqt

 

4 hours ago, BeingRicardo said:

They combine versions on the HOT 100 and just the biggest one is counted, why would they do different this time around? Also remixes are always counted as total sales.

 

3 hours ago, Reputation6754 said:

Billboard just nit picks what they want. They give featured credits when they want. They aren’t even reliable. 
hopefully she doesn’t re-release 1989 soon. It’ll stop charting since they can’t be combined 

 

3 hours ago, Near said:

It would be better for them to count them as the same version as otherwise she will have an abnormally large ammount of chart entries in the next few years

Candle in the wind 1997 was counted as a separate version than the original one from 1988 on Billboard.
Unchained Melody was re recorded and charted separately too. 
So no they aren’t nit picking they have done this before. 

I think it has to do with all 3 songs in this case being actually re recorded in their entirety and re released. 
Remixes aren’t rerecordings. 
But yeah her Hot 100 entries about to blast 

Edited by Cockney Cupcake
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Brando said:

this makes no sense at all. they are pretty much identical. but they group wildly different remix versions together. make it make sense plz  :deadbanana4:

MTE. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.