Search the Community

Thoughts?

now deleted tweet: people can now stop saying she got implants

https://www.instagram.com/reel/CfjEhDVICH3/?igshid=NWRhNmQxMjQ=

Why Fans Think Kim Kardashian Stole $600 Million From Britney Spears Fans have believed for a few years that $600 million was stolen from Britney Spears. Now, they think the Kardashian family may be connected. BY GINA WURTZPUBLISHED 21 HOURS AGO Fans have an interesting theory that Kim Kardashian and her family from The Kardashians are connected to the $600 million that was stolen from pop star Britney Spears while she was in a conservatorship. After being launched into worldwide fame at just 16 years old, Britney was on top of the world in the early 2000s. However, by 2007, the star had a very public meltdown which landed her in a conservatorship. Luckily her millions of adoring fans started to notice something was off about her legal guardianship. While it took over a decade for them to free her, the conservatorship was officially terminated in November 2021. If the "Free Britney" movement revealed anything, it's that Britney's family does not have her best interest at heart and would do anything to scam the mother of two out of the money she spent her life working for. In 2018, Britney's younger sister, Jamie Lynn Spears, was named the trustee of Britney's SJB trust, and fans found this very suspicious. Their suspicions were correct as the star's sister started moving money around to the Stonebridge investment firm. Britney's former business manager Lou Taylor was once the Vice President at Stonebridge and spent years fighting to become a trustee on Britney's account. Fans believe, based on financial records, Jamie Lynn may have transferred $600 million of Britney's money to Taylor. However, fans believe this $600 million was soon moved to a company of the same name in Panama and is connected to the Panama Papers. While fans are after Britney's family and business manager, they also think the Kar-Jenner family could be involved with the missing money. It may sound strange that the famous reality TV family is involved in Britney's fight for financial freedom, but the popular Britney fan account, @BritneyHiatus on Twitter, has jaw-dropping evidence. The connections between The Kardashians and Britney's stolen money go back to the pop star's business manager. Britney is not her only client, as Taylor also manages Kim's money, which fans found out through documents from her divorce from Kanye West. Kim faced a lot of backlash for working with the controversial manager but not as much as she may face once the public hears the latest theory. In January, news broke that Kim had expanded her fortune not just by any number but by $600 million. The increase in her net worth was credited to her shapewear brand SKIMS, but Britney fans think this might be from money laundering. "If you're Lou Taylor and you need to hide $600 million, would Kim's estate be a logical place to try and hide it?" the fan account wondered. However, they're not putting all the blame on Kim as they also pointed out that her younger sister, Kylie Jenner, recently sold half of her makeup company Kylie Cosmetics, for a very familiar price. The fan account explained, "If you're following the conspiracy, that means the money could have went from Britney's trust to Stonebridge to Panama back into the U.S. through Kim's trust and over to Kylie Jenner." The account then called for the FBI to start an investigation. The Britney-Kardashian theory is a wild one like most fan theories are. However, if there's one thing to know about Hollywood, it's that corruption and lies are not out of the norm. The Britney fan account presented some convincing evidence, and with the reality TV family's history, it wouldn't be surprising if they were involved with the pop star's missing fortune. Even if the theory is completely inaccurate, Kim working with such a controversial figure who caused so much damage to Britney is certainly not making her look innocent. However, if the theory gets back to Kim, The Kardashians star will surely have a PR statement clearing her name faster than fans can say, "Free Britney." https://screenrant.com/fans-kim-kardashian-stole-600-million-britney-spears/amp/

https://www.instagram.com/tv/Cf4ydOOgXg3/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= https://www.instagram.com/tv/Cf5IfLigWV3/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= Lewis Vuitton How is her son allowing this?

I love her

his face looks so weird now, serving uncanny valley don’t go any further king

the way they just sit there and eat their food

Elon Musk’s lusty dad, Errol, has finally revealed he sired a secret second love child with his glamorous stepdaughter, Jana Bezuidenhout. The Musk patriarch, 76, welcomed the baby girl with Jana, 35, back in 2019 — but only confirmed the news on Wednesday, bragging to the Sun: “The only thing we are on Earth for is to reproduce.” The two already share a 5-year-old boy, Elliot Rush, born in 2017. Errol’s other children were also “shocked” and uncomfortable about the surprise pregnancy. “They still don’t like it,” Errol admitted in his new interview with the Sun. “They still feel a bit creepy about it, because she’s their sister. Their half-sister.” Despite the fact they are no longer a couple, Errol said Jana and their two young children have come to stay at his home in Pretoria, South Africa. “They spent a few days here about six months ago. And the kids were starting to get on my nerves,” he candidly stated. “Then I miss them as soon as they have gone.” Errol admitted that he hadn’t asked Jana for a paternity test to make sure he was the father of their now-3-year-old, saying: “I haven’t checked her DNA. But she looks just like my other daughters … So it’s pretty obvious, you know.” However, the wealthy businessman stated that there are other women claiming that he has also fathered their children. Meanwhile, the elderly patriarch says he hasn’t ruled out the possibility of having more children in the future: “If I could have another child, I would. I can’t see any reason not to.”

Twitter reacts to her official TikTok (now has been deleted) Doja continues on IG live about finally saying it: Context:

Adele is said to be working on an "intimate documentary" that will explore her career and life, including how she deals with being one of the best-selling artists in the world. The singer-songwriter, 34, has made headlines over the last year with her fourth album, the postponing of her Las Vegas residency and her relationship with Rich Paul, 40. It's been reported such topics will be featured in a new documentary about the Grammy Award winner - which is said to offer a glimpse at Adele's life beyond the stage. https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/adele-planning-tell-documentary-las-27487717

I feel like they do this every album Link: https://twitter.com/justcatchmedemi/status/1547966610429788163?s=21&t=s-46Y3xqbgfMe1KbzUnDBQ

Yesterday, J.Lo's Netflix documentary premiered at Tribeca Film Festival in New York. Amanda Micheli's film charts the megastar’s ascendance from the streets of the Bronx to the Super Bowl stage in Miami. It will start streaming next week, June 14, on Netflix and revealed some parts about the Super Bowl Halftime preparations. Both Shakira and the NFL wanted to scrap the political statement made during Born In The U.S.A (timestamped in video below): The "Born In The U.S.A." performance featured J.Lo's 11-year-old daughter Emme and other Latinx children singing from illuminated cages and singing the words "Let's Get Loud", while the lighting behind them appeared to reflect a wired fence. It was a political statement protesting the American government treatment of immigrants and Puerto Rico. The Trump administration's 'zero tolerance' immigration policy at the US-Mexico border wall has led to hundreds of children being separated from their parents; Jennifer was born in NYC to Puerto Rican parents NFL also wanted to scrap that part according to Entertainment Weekly: Benny Medina, J.Lo's manager: "The NFL had a real concern about making a political statement about immigration. They looked at the plans, and the message was absolute. They did not want those cages in the show. That had come down from the highest authority." Lopez says she ultimately felt a responsibility to carry on with the show, which was ultimately hailed as a "frank and necessary political moment for a league that has been criticized for sorely lacking both," EW's Alex Suskind wrote at the time. "For me, this isn't about politics. This is about human rights. I'm facing the biggest crossroads of my life, to be able to perform on the world's biggest stage, but to take out the cages and sacrifice what I believe in would be like never being there at all," she says. "There was a part of me that just got very zen and I was just like, 'Benny I don't care what you have to do, we're not changing the show. The Super Bowl is tomorrow and we're not changing anything.'" She got her way, cause it ended up in the final show. Entertainment Weekly also shares the documentary touches on disappointment that both stars have to co-headline the SB HT show and have to share time. "Typically, you have one headliner at a Super Bowl. That headliner constructs a show, and, should they choose to have other guests, that's their choice," Medina says. "It was an insult to say you needed two Latinas to do the job that one artist historically has done." In comparison, prior performers like Lady Gaga and Madonna performed solo shows at the Super Bowl for about 14 minutes and 15 minutes, respectively. Earlier in Halftime, Lopez is shown having a preliminary discussion with Shakira regarding the performance and how much time they will each take up during the set. "I know that the Super Bowl people want us to be weaved throughout the show. I haven't had a confirmation about how many minutes I'm going to have," Shakira tells Lopez, who responds: "Let me address that really quick. They said 12 minutes. I got kind of a good confirmation that we could have an extra minute or two, so now we're at, like, 13, 14 minutes. I think, Shakira, what we should have is you should have half the time and I should [have half]." "If it was going to be a double-headliner, they should have given us 20 minutes," Lopez finishes. "That's what they should've f---ing done." https://ew.com/movies/jennifer-lopez-halftime-documentary-nfl-double-headline-show-worst-idea/