alestevens Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, peterstyles13 said: This. Also, HDD not mentionning the 2M figure comes from Taylor's label, NOT Billboard. I wonder why huh . Their hatred for Billboard is pathetic You can tell they didnt even read the article because in it Billboard says they share this same prediction HDD mentioned. The blatant agenda-pushing is just funny at this point
umich Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 Just now, Reza said: Why is questioning gimmicky tactics being pressed? Because her label predicted 2 million. Not BB. They literally broke their heels to read that BB reputation article and automatically assumed that they made the prediction. So yes, their bias against BB (for whatever reason it may be) shows that they are mad and pressed.
muddysquirrel Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 20 minutes ago, alestevens said: HDD: "Taylor is aiming for 3.5M like Adele" Also HDD: "LOL the bible is delusional how is she going to sell 2M? They know nothing lololol"
simmnfierzig Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 4 minutes ago, umich said: Because her label predicted 2 million. Not BB. They literally broke their heels to read that BB reputation article and automatically assumed that they made the prediction. So yes, their bias against BB (for whatever reason it may be) shows that they are mad and pressed. They are biased against Billboard because they would like to be Billboard themselves
Reza Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 5 minutes ago, umich said: Because her label predicted 2 million. Not BB. They literally broke their heels to read that BB reputation article and automatically assumed that they made the prediction. So yes, their bias against BB (for whatever reason it may be) shows that they are mad and pressed. So now everyone loves BB? I thought atrl hated BB.
peterstyles13 Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 7 minutes ago, Reza said: Why is questioning gimmicky tactics being pressed? You didn't read the article, did you? Where are they questioning ''gimmicky tactics''? They're just dragging Billboard, who didn't even predict the 2M number they are talking about to begin with.
Squall Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 (edited) The label didn't make it clear whether their expectations are US-only or WW though. Edited November 8, 2017 by Squall
yamiyuuuu Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 21 minutes ago, alestevens said: HDD: "Taylor is aiming for 3.5M like Adele" Also HDD: "LOL the bible is delusional how is she going to sell 2M? They know nothing lololol" This lmao
Squall Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 And not HDD trying to act like 2M is way too far-fetched when they said she could beat Adele's record, the nerve
UnusualBoy Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 They have a lot of nerve considering they were saying she was gonna pull Adele numbers and ****, sit HDD.
Newt Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 Someone at HDD didnt fact check this article. Where did BB say 2 million for swift? They said 1.4, which lines up what they and everyone else is saying. They usually post high quality writing, so this is disappointing
brainmaniac Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 2 hours ago, Hector said: Billboard’s John Amato makes another huge rule change for her in exchange for a meet-and-greet with the staff of a Del Taco in Bensonhurst. That’s entirely plausible, given Amato’s general spinelessness and the Bible’s propensity for changing rules like they’re light bulbs (witness the recent YouTube chart debacle) They are so pressed!
beautiful player Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 I mean... they really didn't tell a lie
Temporal Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 2 hours ago, Marvin said: omg the fumes Right omg but i agree with them here tbh
Chemical X. Posted November 8, 2017 Posted November 8, 2017 (edited) Why are they acting like Billboard changes the rules frequently? Especially when they tend to follow the lead of the RIAA, who has always been the ones to adjust for different types of consumption? It’s just untrue. They may fib certain things for big artists but the actual rules don’t change that often. Edited November 8, 2017 by Chemical X.
lipes Posted November 9, 2017 Posted November 9, 2017 3 hours ago, peterstyles13 said: This. Also, HDD not mentionning the 2M figure comes from Taylor's label, NOT Billboard. I wonder why huh . Their hatred for Billboard is pathetic
castle13 Posted November 9, 2017 Posted November 9, 2017 3 hours ago, alestevens said: HDD: "Taylor is aiming for 3.5M like Adele" Also HDD: "LOL the bible is delusional how is she going to sell 2M? They know nothing lololol" mess
MANUELF Posted November 9, 2017 Posted November 9, 2017 They broke a heel by rushing to write this Billboard bashing piece
brianc33710 Posted November 9, 2017 Posted November 9, 2017 Interesting, considering HDD was hyping Swift so much just a couple of months ago saying she could challenge Adele's 25 record setting opening (3.5 M) .....
Recommended Posts