Space Cowboy Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Thoughts? In my opinion AI haters are so f*cking cringe. It's just a tool at the end of the day, and it's going to be an industry standard in the near future. I can't stand people who resist change and want stay stuck in the past. AI is the future. This whole outrage is so stupid 2
izebize Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Yeah, "just a tool" that makes global warming much worse and costs water to use. What's cringe is people getting so used to it they become lazy and dumb about things they could have done themselves. Can't think of a grimmer future than people outsourcing everything to AI and other people eating all that pig slop up. Not to mention many already lack the critical thinking skills to distinguish AI generated **** from reality and it will only excarberate the rise of fascism globally. But yeah, sure, "just a tool." 5
Mr. Blue_Shirt Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Timothée's award campaigner leaked the exposé so he can have a strong shot at winning the Oscar over Adrien Brody 1 6
illia Posted January 19 Posted January 19 That speech company also worked on Emilia Perez? I wonder what they "enhanced" 14 1
Princess Aurora Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Maybe AI should only be allowed for shizposting, medical research, and chores.
Antisocialites Posted January 19 Posted January 19 not them using AI to enhance accents, that's so f*cking lame. 8
Space Cowboy Posted January 19 Author Posted January 19 8 minutes ago, izebize said: Yeah, "just a tool" that makes global warming much worse and costs water to use. What's cringe is people getting so used to it they become lazy and dumb about things they could have done themselves. Can't think of a grimmer future than people outsourcing everything to AI and other people eating all that pig slop up. Not to mention many already lack the critical thinking skills to distinguish AI generated **** from reality and it will only excarberate the rise of fascism globally. But yeah, sure, "just a tool." The planet is already cooked, and it's not because of AI, it's capitalism. Just 100 companies are responsible for 70% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Criticizing AI for being 'bad for the environment' feels like selective outrage. By that logic, we should be coming as well for driving, the meat industry, or even the tech industry as a whole: servers, data centers, and smartphones all require massive energy consumption. Yet, none of these get the same level of scrutiny. The truth is, AI isn't the root of the problem. The problem is a much larger system of exploitation and greed. 2
izebize Posted January 19 Posted January 19 23 minutes ago, Space Cowboy said: The planet is already cooked, and it's not because of AI, it's capitalism. Just 100 companies are responsible for 70% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Criticizing AI for being 'bad for the environment' feels like selective outrage. By that logic, we should be coming as well for driving, the meat industry, or even the tech industry as a whole: servers, data centers, and smartphones all require massive energy consumption. Yet, none of these get the same level of scrutiny. The truth is, AI isn't the root of the problem. The problem is a much larger system of exploitation and greed. Sure, planet already cooked, but AI plays a huge part in making it happen faster. Driving, meat, the tech industry at large all have way more right to exist than AI Access to mobility, food, and technology should be human rights, and agreed they shouldn't be exclusive to driving and meat but a mixture of other methods and uses such as public transport (where applicable) and alternatives to meat. But I still feel those are more justified than AI. Agreed on greed and capitalism being the core of the problem, I never said it was all AI's fault. But when you look at it through that lens it's hard to not see how AI and everything surrounding it is an extension of it. It kills creativity. Also in this specific case why not find actors who are able to do a good Hungarian accent? Enhancing acting skills is one of the lamest use of AI I have heard of. How about hiring someone who can do the job instead? There's also no need to make up this historic figure and then AI generate his life's work. There have been actual architects whose work and life could have been told instead. Creativity does not equate AI-generating **** and then sifting through that to see what works. Incredibly sloppy and lazy, should not even qualify as actual art.
commander Posted January 19 Posted January 19 (edited) The use of AI in creative industries will be more common over time unfortunately. I even see some sort of "AI-free creation" certification or stamp happening in the future. Edited January 19 by commander 1
Cheers Posted January 19 Posted January 19 The AI was used on Emilia Perez? That explains… a LOT actually. The vulva line alone 1
chiaroscuro Posted January 19 Posted January 19 You'll care when your job is automated out of existence by it. Vapid *******...
Space Cowboy Posted January 19 Author Posted January 19 1 minute ago, perfect blue said: You'll care when your job is automated out of existence by it. Vapid *******... So? Should we completely stop progress just because some people might lose their jobs? If AI changes the job market, adapt or get left behind. 1
chiaroscuro Posted January 19 Posted January 19 7 minutes ago, Space Cowboy said: So? Should we completely stop progress just because some people might lose their jobs? If AI changes the job market, adapt or get left behind. Yes, until basic safety nets are up. You realize that when AI renders entire industries obsolete this will negatively impact every single labor market, right? Anyway what's with the callous "let them eat cake" vibe? From a peasant, no less.
Space Cowboy Posted January 19 Author Posted January 19 8 minutes ago, perfect blue said: Yes, until basic safety nets are up. You realize that when AI renders entire industries obsolete this will negatively impact every single labor market, right? Anyway what's with the callous "let them eat cake" vibe? From a peasant, no less. Progress has always disrupted industries, that's how society evolves. The Industrial Revolution didn't care for people's "basic safety nets" and neither will AI. People adapted then and they'll adapt now. AI will keep evolving and becoming bigger part of our daily lives whether you like it or not. You can either keep complaining uselessly or figure out how to adapt.
sunbathinganimal Posted January 19 Posted January 19 Quote If Adrien Brody wins with his AI ENHANCED Hungarian accent I will kill myself in front of the Academy 1
WildAmerican Posted January 19 Posted January 19 All movies are now using AI in their productions in someway. Whatever your favorite movie of 2024 is, it probably was used for something. Are we going to have an outrage cycle each time something like this is revealed or actually have a conversation about how to implement it effectively without taking jobs from people?
Antisocialites Posted January 19 Posted January 19 (edited) 1 hour ago, Space Cowboy said: So? Should we completely stop progress just because some people might lose their jobs? If AI changes the job market, adapt or get left behind. aren't you saying that capitalism is the bigger problem? why are you mad at the working class for being afraid of losing their only way of income because the system (as in capitalism and big companies) is using AI as another tool to weak them and make their lives even more miserable? Edited January 19 by Antisocialites
Uncatena Posted January 20 Posted January 20 using GenAI should disqualify a movie from any award ceremony. absolutely abhorrent and anti-art. 1
Uncatena Posted January 20 Posted January 20 15 hours ago, Space Cowboy said: By that logic, we should be coming as well for driving, the meat industry, or even the tech industry as a whole: servers, data centers, and smartphones all require massive energy consumption. Yet, none of these get the same level of scrutiny. well, I am coming for those as well and they absolutely should get the same level of scrutiny. saying "hey, these things are just as bad" is not the tug for AI you think it is. 11 hours ago, Space Cowboy said: AI will keep evolving and becoming bigger part of our daily lives whether you like it or not. that should terrify you, btw. 1
Recommended Posts