discussion Does your perception of others fall in line with their reputation points?

[fememeist]

Does the ATRL reputation gauge fall in line with your perception of others on this forum too?  I noticed a katy perry stan getting -12 thumbs down on a beyonce thread and low and behold they have a negative reputation. Which makes sense because they have really shitty takes, but what do you think? 

[Illuminati]

No I think it's very easy to rack up positive reputation, I mean even my insufferable ass is in the positive. It doesn't reflect on whether or not someone has good takes.

 

The only ones in the negative are dedicated trolls that put in the WORK to get downvotes

[Loca]

No, it's the opposite for me. Controversial figures for the win. 

[commander]

No, but I already know what to expect based on who they stan 

 

[Selegend]

Not at all. There's 2 users here that probably have like +10k reputation that i find really annoying cuz u can tell that most of their takes is not even their true opinion, they just do it for the likes. 
"How can i write the most basic tired joke to get fast 15 likes?" 

[LustSpell]

No. I don't even know where you check someone's rep count

[Pikachoo]

well I had a clever response for this thread, with screenshots and all, but I got a timeout exception (as I always do on this site) and lost all my work, so all I can say is I if this site's host provider were a user I would downvote them to hell

 

 

[Digitalism]

No because if you attack people like katy, nicki or demi you'll get easily upvoted.

When you say something negative about Taylor or Gaga you get instantly downvoted and warned.

 

Edit: Also there are people that know this and only comment to get upvotes. Some of them even going from hating somebody to "staning". Not gonna name names. If you know you know. 

Edited 5 hours ago by Digitalism

[nostalgic]

There's stans on here that will downvote you for having even the most mild, reasonable critique of their fave so NO. Those numbers are easy to game and easy to lose if you step out of line

[getBusy]

I don't even pay attention to the usernames 💀 I read the comments only

[naval23]

no reputation points just reflect the masses 

 

some of the funniest users aren't even on the board with reputation points but way more memorable

[John Slayne]

people generally upvote a lot more so to have negative points you have to be either new (with a couple of controversial takes) or be a troll

[illia]

No. The reputation points are a useless metric to judge because there are some users with lots of positive reputation who are total dіcks

[Venice B]

Imagine caring for reputation points on atrl.net like  

[Da Vinci]

I don't even notice people's rep points nor do I care  All I know is that Kukai has the record for most negative points?

[qegqeg]

I guess. High reputation points usually just means the user posts a lot 

[Gladiator]

I don't really have perceptions of users here. I just come here to post when I am bored.

 

I also have no idea what the rep icons mean from just looking at them, so I have no idea how many points they have.

 

 

 

 

 

Edited 4 hours ago by Gladiator

[dumbsparce]

You can state literal facts like "No one cares about Gaga's parts in DWAS" and you're guaranteed 50 dislikes. The more angry faces the more truth has been spilled so 

[Pheromosa]

@Kukai theyre dragging you in here sis

[Bussea]

Nah. There's a user with a very high rep and they're borderline insufferable.

[Raphy23]

I don't look at that ****.