Jump to content

Blake Lively vs Justin Baldoni Megathread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • MattieB

    173

  • bjorn

    79

  • Hey Babes

    60

  • Vermillion

    55

Posted

It's even sadder to learn that Justin invited a woman with cancer to the premiere and tried his best to make her feel special even though they were forced in to the basement, she sadly died soon after.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 4
Posted (edited)
On 2/1/2025 at 10:17 AM, Riot said:

 

She is literally using these pop culture chats and Wendy Williams'd videos to try and take her hyperconservative-Catholic views into the mainstream.

She said in one of her most recent videos that she calls her sons "gay" used as an insult when they do something that is not "manly" enough. She has associated multiple times gay people to pedophiles. She literally supports Trump and what he is doing to trans people.

 

How can you even defend her? :skull:

Too bad you were in such a rush to vent that you failed to correctly identify the correct post and author who linked to her in the first place 💀

 

On 2/1/2025 at 12:41 AM, americanlife said:

Quite eye opening

 

 

 

Edited by Dante Silva
Posted

 

:ryan3:

  • Haha 4
Posted


Not a failed gag order attempt 

 

spacer.png

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 5
Posted
On 2/2/2025 at 6:21 AM, bjorn said:

Blake and Ryans statement they wanted Baldoni to release 

 

spacer.png

 

sick individuals :ahh:

This **** is so stupid I genuinely believe they wrote it themselves lol 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Posted

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-14354989/Justin-Baldoni-Blake-Lively-court-400M-defamation-case.html
 

:coffee2:
 

Quote

Blake Lively intends to hit Justin Baldoni with fresh allegations in her sexual harassment case, her lawyer has revealed.

And the actress' lawyer Michael Gottlieb said in court on Monday that protecting the couple's celebrity friends was going to be 'very important'. 

Gottlieb told the court during the hearing that they intend to add 'both claims and parties' to a revised complaint which will be filed by Valentine's Day.

 

Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, bjorn said:

Why would new allegations be added on top of the already filed ones? I would assume those would be in the first one, unless there's another woman coming forward? 
 

Everything is possible, they will probably try to dig anything. 

Edited by IVY
Posted

I believe Justin's re-filing would have initially come as a shock to Blake's legal team, and Blake's team wants to counter that move as an act of posturing to send a false flag message that they also have something new—purely to be perceived as the team with the edge, simply through being the most recent legal team to do so. In reality, they have found something technical to use as a vehicle to suggest they have some kind of smoking gun.

 

What we do know is that Blake and Ryan never anticipated any fight from Justin at all.

 

It seems to me that when Blake and Ryan's team constructed her 17-point set of rules - that Blake required Wayfarer to sign off on, before she would return to set after the break in filming - the rule about Wayfarer agreeing not to file any legal action against Blake, was intended to leave Justin a sitting duck.

 

Already, by that point, Ryan privately had his lawyers conduct a scrupulous analysis of Wayfarer's contract with Colleen Hoover pertaining to the screenplay rights so that Ryan could find something in those rights that could be activated for the purpose of terminating Wayfarer's rights to the screenplay, allowing those rights to revert back to Colleen, who by that point had been 'buttered up' by Ryan and was only too happy to sell them (a second time) - this time to Ryan, who realized the potential for Colleen's novels to catapult Blake into the "A" List.

 

Through his lawyers analysis of that contract, Ryan discovered that Wayfarer would lose the rights to the screenplay if a representative of Wayfarer (Justin), were to be convicted of charges relating to SA.

 

Before Ryan and Blake enacted their plan, they essentially attempted to bury the one point—out of the 17—which asked Wayfarer to randomly agree not to file any legal action against Blake. This was done without Wayfarer knowing at that point why there was anticipation on the part of Ryan and Blake regarding why Wayfarer would even want to agree to such a clause.

 

It appears that Ryan and Blake privately knew they had a future intention to file a legal motion pertaining to a SA complaint against Wayfarer (Justin) and wanted to ensure that Justin was legally bound from defending himself by having already agreed not to file any future motion against Blake, all before Justin had any clue that Blake's first court filing against him was coming.

 

Ryan and Blake were always focused on the clause in Colleen Hoover's original contract regarding the screenplay, particularly the one related to triggering a loss of contractual rights - if the owner of those rights were to later be accused of SA.

 

By getting Justin to blindly sign a legal agreement (in advance of any legal motion against him), that stipulated he would not file any legal motion against Blake in the future - Blake and Ryan believed that their accusation of sexual assault would leave Justin indefensible.
 

It appears they thought he would be found guilty of sexual assault, thus triggering the clause in Colleen Hoover's original screenplay contract with Wayfarer, which meant the screenplay rights would revert back to Colleen, allowing her to regain those rights shortly before re-selling them to Ryan.

 

That is what this entire mess has been about from the start.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 7
Posted

Blake Taylor and Ryan are all control freaks :deadbanana:

Posted

Blake is actually despicable.

Ryan is little *****. 

I'm so sorry Justin had to put up with these people but I'm glad he fights back.

  • Like 1
Posted

1. Whichever Blake fan reported me. F U 

 

2. Don't allow the Blake Crusaders to turn this discussion into a Candace thread, its a distraction. these are the same people who kiki to Azealia banks on the daily. save the virtue-signaling

 

3. Hurray the judge denied the gag order

  • Like 7
Posted
On 2/2/2025 at 9:59 AM, Lovett said:

She's not the only one covering this, with the exact same takes and information though. There's absolutely no need to be platforming such a toxic and bigoted person on here. None whatsoever.

I actually find it interesting this is your focus after being mia from this thread after Justin's lawsuit

  • Thanks 1
Posted

That video of Candace Owens claiming Taylor put pressure in the NY Times for the hit piece is INSANE.

 

And she posted some facts, I can't stand the woman but she has been bringing a lot of tea on this.

 

If Taylor really did that she's sick in the head, and she will get dragged to hell

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, MattieB said:

I actually find it interesting this is your focus after being mia from this thread after Justin's lawsuit

I've been choosing to read the thread, listen to the evidence as it unfolds and follow along without saying "SHE'S THE DEVIL!!!!11" every 20 mins like other people in this thread. Me not chiming in is not me being mia. If you bothered to look at the 'Recently Browsing' you'd find me in there often.

 

If you take issue with me calling out the sharing of an extremely toxic, bigoted and hateful person in this thread, then that's on you.

  • Like 3
Posted

@BryanFreedman said 

 

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Lovett said:

I've been choosing to read the thread, listen to the evidence as it unfolds and follow along without saying "SHE'S THE DEVIL!!!!11" every 20 mins like other people in this thread. Me not chiming in is not me being mia. If you bothered to look at the 'Recently Browsing' you'd find me in there often.

 

If you take issue with me calling out the sharing of an extremely toxic, bigoted and hateful person in this thread, then that's on you.

Yet, strangely the post that features a direct link to one of her videos on page 40, bizarrely does not have a single dislike.

Posted
15 hours ago, bjorn said:

Why would new allegations be added on top of the already filed ones? I would assume those would be in the first one, unless there's another woman coming forward? 
 

The messed up part is I wouldn't put it past team Lively to pay a woman to say the same happened to her to back up her claims, at this point it's looking so bad for her, Reynolds and Swift that they'd just about do anything to make her look good. 
 

 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Dante Silva said:

Yet, strangely the post that features a direct link to one of her videos on page 40, bizarrely does not have a single dislike.

Not sure what you're expecting me to do with that information.

Posted

It appears Ryan's street autograph session was staged:

 

 

 

 

  • Haha 3
Posted
On 2/3/2025 at 1:35 AM, Dante Silva said:

It's even sadder to learn that Justin invited a woman with cancer to the premiere and tried his best to make her feel special even though they were forced in to the basement, she sadly died soon after.

This had me stuck for a few days ngl. That was truly vile of her.

Posted
9 hours ago, Dante Silva said:

It appears Ryan's street autograph session was staged:

 

 

 

 

Of course it was lmao, he's going by the old Hollywood PR playbook. Alot of these celebs forget we're in the age of the internet.

 

sidebar, that reporter is MILKING this situation, all her videos do well over 100k

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
15 hours ago, Lovett said:

I've been choosing to read the thread, listen to the evidence as it unfolds and follow along without saying "SHE'S THE DEVIL!!!!11" every 20 mins like other people in this thread. Me not chiming in is not me being mia. If you bothered to look at the 'Recently Browsing' you'd find me in there often.

 

If you take issue with me calling out the sharing of an extremely toxic, bigoted and hateful person in this thread, then that's on you.

This is EXACTLY what you did to Justin after Blake accused him of SA, please save the virtue signaling, you didn't give him a chance to defend himself. Yall pounced on him just because she was a woman and he was a man. Remember when you called me a misogynist for saying the same thing you said?

  • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.