Space Cowboy Posted February 2 Posted February 2 8 hours ago, Gaia said: This... doesn't excuse Blake falsely accusing a man of sexual assault as a career move. It's the same dumb argument as "xxx's lawyer represented xxx! See! Not a good person" That has 0 relevance to the actual case. You can dislike Candace Owens, not watch her videos on this lawsuit, etc. but she's not just giving opinions, she's actually bringing out cold hard receipts that are undeniable. A broken clock yada yada, unfortunately this is one of those times Candace is right. She might be right, but you can all choose NOT to engage with or bring into the discussion the content of that idiotic, racist, homophobic, transphobic, evil witch. And I say this as someone who can't stand Blake 4 1
soulsearcher Posted February 2 Posted February 2 So, Ronan Farrow doesn't write for NYT. He commented on someones post. So, what now Candace?https://www.instagram.com/deuxmoi/p/DFjQlefpDHb/?img_index=6 1
Acuminatus Posted February 2 Posted February 2 The good news is Klandace Owens is only regurgitating content she stole from other content creators, so she can be easily ignored. 1 1
Blumoon Posted February 2 Posted February 2 8 minutes ago, soulsearcher said: So, Ronan Farrow doesn't write for NYT. He commented on someones post. So, what now Candace?https://www.instagram.com/deuxmoi/p/DFjQlefpDHb/?img_index=6 Did Candace say that? She was pointing out he had a relationship with the writers that did and was the bridge for the connection.
GiselleBeyince Posted February 2 Posted February 2 (edited) 14 minutes ago, soulsearcher said: So, Ronan Farrow doesn't write for NYT. He commented on someones post. So, what now Candace?https://www.instagram.com/deuxmoi/p/DFjQlefpDHb/?img_index=6 His piece about Harvey Weinstein, the one he won the Pulitzer for was for the New York Times. He co-wrote it with Megan, the same lady that wrote the Justin Baldoni article for Blake Lively. People are just connecting the dots and drawing inferences from the close degrees of separation in this case .... Did anyone here see this section? The other sites are eating it up. Blake tells Justin, "...you'd have a sense of how flirty and yummy the ball busting would play. It's my love language. Spicy and playfully bold, never with teeth." Well Blake, at least we now know you know what a double entendre is. Question, how is that not considered sexual harassment? Now wonder Ryan got pissed after he went home during the strikes. He saw all these texts and got mad. The fact that Justin immediately mentioned his kids and family. Blake was playing a dangerous game here. Everything she accused Justin Baldoni of, she did herself to him. There must be some sort of consequence for the stunt she and her lying ass husband pulled. Edited February 2 by GiselleBeyince 2 1
Radical Pessimism Posted February 2 Posted February 2 People willingly watch/defend Candace Owen… and I see posts normalizing these ppl are the core reason why the USA are seizing passports from trans people! I might gone off topic because I'm not aware of this particular situation but I find it so weird that people using her as a source!!! 2 1
bjorn Posted February 2 Posted February 2 27 minutes ago, GiselleBeyince said: His piece about Harvey Weinstein, the one he won the Pulitzer for was for the New York Times. He co-wrote it with Megan, the same lady that wrote the Justin Baldoni article for Blake Lively. People are just connecting the dots and drawing inferences from the close degrees of separation in this case .... Did anyone here see this section? The other sites are eating it up. Blake tells Justin, "...you'd have a sense of how flirty and yummy the ball busting would play. It's my love language. Spicy and playfully bold, never with teeth." Well Blake, at least we now know you know what a double entendre is. Question, how is that not considered sexual harassment? Now wonder Ryan got pissed after he went home during the strikes. He saw all these texts and got mad. The fact that Justin immediately mentioned his kids and family. Blake was playing a dangerous game here. Everything she accused Justin Baldoni of, she did herself to him. There must be some sort of consequence for the stunt she and her lying ass husband pulled. Omg 1
bjorn Posted February 2 Posted February 2 7 minutes ago, Radical Pessimism said: People willingly watch/defend Candace Owen… and I see posts normalizing these ppl are the core reason why the USA are seizing passports from trans people! I might gone off topic because I'm not aware of this particular situation but I find it so weird that people using her as a source!!! I think most on here disagree strongly with her political views. Her coverage of the Blake/Baldoni is well put together and fact-based. I think people can differentiate the two and be nuanced. Doesn't change my opinion of her. I still disagree with her politically. 1
soulsearcher Posted February 2 Posted February 2 42 minutes ago, GiselleBeyince said: His piece about Harvey Weinstein, the one he won the Pulitzer for was for the New York Times. He co-wrote it with Megan, the same lady that wrote the Justin Baldoni article for Blake Lively. People are just connecting the dots and drawing inferences from the close degrees of separation in this case .... Did anyone here see this section? The other sites are eating it up. Blake tells Justin, "...you'd have a sense of how flirty and yummy the ball busting would play. It's my love language. Spicy and playfully bold, never with teeth." Well Blake, at least we now know you know what a double entendre is. Question, how is that not considered sexual harassment? Now wonder Ryan got pissed after he went home during the strikes. He saw all these texts and got mad. The fact that Justin immediately mentioned his kids and family. Blake was playing a dangerous game here. Everything she accused Justin Baldoni of, she did herself to him. There must be some sort of consequence for the stunt she and her lying ass husband pulled. I knew that. What I meant was the whole "Taylor worked with him on this article" sentiment. Anyway, it's a mess at this point.
Lovett Posted February 2 Posted February 2 13 minutes ago, bjorn said: I think most on here disagree strongly with her political views. Her coverage of the Blake/Baldoni is well put together and fact-based. I think people can differentiate the two and be nuanced. Doesn't change my opinion of her. I still disagree with her politically. She's not the only one covering this, with the exact same takes and information though. There's absolutely no need to be platforming such a toxic and bigoted person on here. None whatsoever. 5 1
May Posted February 2 Posted February 2 so Blake sent Justin a drafted statement to release publicly taking all blame for the messiness of production and saying that Blake was nothing short of professional and cordial this woman is actually DERANGED. 6
bjorn Posted February 2 Posted February 2 Blake and Ryans statement they wanted Baldoni to release sick individuals 3 7
Dante Silva Posted February 2 Posted February 2 1 hour ago, bjorn said: I think most on here disagree strongly with her political views. Her coverage of the Blake/Baldoni is well put together and fact-based. I think people can differentiate the two and be nuanced. Doesn't change my opinion of her. I still disagree with her politically. Exactly this, nobody gave her clicks, she was featured in a video by left-field content creator Dave Neal.
Marla Singer Posted February 2 Posted February 2 15 hours ago, leonbotstein said: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1293_ZZ7WxCSNu8vDrUNzWjBur-96gYsO/view Spread it far and wide. This is well worth reading if you have any interest in this case. There's so much that just isn't included in the main headlines and articles about it. I'm not even halfway through this but it's just shocking how much of a monster she is, and all of the concrete evidence that's there to back it all up. I knew she was a "mean girl" but I didn't realize just how twisted she really is and how much of a nightmare it must be to work with her, and Ryan too. Anyone who even just reads 10-20 pages of this at random with the accompanying evidence would not want to work with either of them, they are dangerous. It's also sad that Justin, at many stages, was clearly trying to keep the peace because Blake was pissing the people off, and making things difficult for everyone and putting the schedule and budget for the filming at risk, but he also tried as best he could to accommodate some of her demands, without giving her too much. Any more famous director than him would've told her, Ryan and Taylor to **** off and would've had Blake replaced. And yet she still tries to destroy his career and his life just because he wouldn't give her complete control of his film. 1 12
Blumoon Posted February 2 Posted February 2 2 hours ago, bjorn said: Blake and Ryans statement they wanted Baldoni to release sick individuals Something is really wrong with them. 3
Jay07 Posted February 2 Posted February 2 (edited) Ryan Reynolds always seemed like a piece of **** and so did his forced and fake nice guy act. I am not the least bit surprised their entire circle is power and money obssessed sociopaths. Edited February 2 by Jay07 10
Vermillion Posted February 2 Posted February 2 The twists and turns! Chile. Thank you everyone for the explainers to avoid the chaos of Reddit and Lipstick Alley. 3
bjorn Posted February 2 Posted February 2 24 minutes ago, Vermillion said: The twists and turns! Chile. Thank you everyone for the explainers to avoid the chaos of Reddit and Lipstick Alley. What are they saying over there? 2
May Posted February 2 Posted February 2 2 hours ago, bjorn said: What are they saying over there? Fauxmoi subreddit is somehow very heavily siding with Blake. Their arguments are "Justin's trying so hard to prove himself innocent that he must be guilty" 💀💀 Worms for brains 1 7
Bookmark99 Posted February 2 Posted February 2 Just finished reading the whole thing. Blake, Ryan, and that Jones PR publicist woman are clear power hungry sociopaths. Also I'm dying at Blake trying to take over the script after admitting she never read the book 2 7
Magickarp Posted February 2 Posted February 2 So Blake never read the book, but managed to get the writer of the book on her side anyway? 4
Hey Babes Posted February 2 Posted February 2 10 hours ago, GiselleBeyince said: His piece about Harvey Weinstein, the one he won the Pulitzer for was for the New York Times. He co-wrote it with Megan, the same lady that wrote the Justin Baldoni article for Blake Lively. People are just connecting the dots and drawing inferences from the close degrees of separation in this case .... Did anyone here see this section? The other sites are eating it up. Blake tells Justin, "...you'd have a sense of how flirty and yummy the ball busting would play. It's my love language. Spicy and playfully bold, never with teeth." Well Blake, at least we now know you know what a double entendre is. Question, how is that not considered sexual harassment? Now wonder Ryan got pissed after he went home during the strikes. He saw all these texts and got mad. The fact that Justin immediately mentioned his kids and family. Blake was playing a dangerous game here. Everything she accused Justin Baldoni of, she did herself to him. There must be some sort of consequence for the stunt she and her lying ass husband pulled. I am loss for words… was she offering a free blowjob? 1
IVY Posted February 2 Posted February 2 (edited) Omg I became very furious while reading all the texts with the exact timelines and all I can think of is how it must've been very exhausting for Justin to watch every word he says because doesn't know which side of twisted Blake he's going to get. And what made me more angry is how Sony let her do it simply because she is the bigger celebrity, that wasn't professional at all on their part. And then they have the audacity to publicly support her claims even though they knew what really happened and knew about her manipulation & twisted games. What was supposed to be a wonderful experience for Justin making this film turned into a living nightmare because of Blake & Ryan. I applaud Justin for being a gentleman and trying his best to remain calm & respectful with Blake despite everything. Edited February 4 by IVY 3
IVY Posted February 2 Posted February 2 (edited) On 2/2/2025 at 1:12 AM, GiselleBeyince said: His piece about Harvey Weinstein, the one he won the Pulitzer for was for the New York Times. He co-wrote it with Megan, the same lady that wrote the Justin Baldoni article for Blake Lively. People are just connecting the dots and drawing inferences from the close degrees of separation in this case .... Did anyone here see this section? The other sites are eating it up. Blake tells Justin, "...you'd have a sense of how flirty and yummy the ball busting would play. It's my love language. Spicy and playfully bold, never with teeth." Well Blake, at least we now know you know what a double entendre is. Question, how is that not considered sexual harassment? Now wonder Ryan got pissed after he went home during the strikes. He saw all these texts and got mad. The fact that Justin immediately mentioned his kids and family. Blake was playing a dangerous game here. Everything she accused Justin Baldoni of, she did herself to him. There must be some sort of consequence for the stunt she and her lying ass husband pulled. Now imagine it it was Justin who sent this to Blake, the outrage would have been huge but people are giving her excuses saying she's talking about her film's character. Her supporters want us to believe that Justin was sexually harassing her when he was acting out an intimate scene with full crew around them and with the camera rolling. Edited February 4 by IVY 2
Recommended Posts